Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/21/2015 3:09:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

A paper worth looking up. Thx!


2 posted on 03/21/2015 3:12:25 PM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Very true, but remember that you are trying to change the minds of “fence posts”.


3 posted on 03/21/2015 3:14:11 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (We're depending on a dept. to negotiate a nuclear arms treaty that can't even run a email system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The science is SETTLED. No further inquiry into the subject is needed or desired.


4 posted on 03/21/2015 3:17:33 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExSoldier

Ping.


5 posted on 03/21/2015 3:23:24 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

[[New Climate Paper Gives Global Warming Alarmists ‘One Helluva Beating’]]

NO it hasn’t- climate change LIARS are hell bent on perpetrating the lie of MAN-CAUSED climate change, and no little paper is going to hinder their efforts to scam the world- they will either simply ignore it OR attack the people who wrote it and the public will believe the people who wrote it ‘aren’t really credible scientists’ after the left gets done tearing them apart

Marc Morano’s site climatedepot is chockerblock full of devastating scientific research that SHOULD give global warming alarmists one ‘helluva beating’ yet they simply ignore that site- and attack marc morano- and no one is the wiser


6 posted on 03/21/2015 3:24:12 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

These hard core believers in CC are just another branch of Scientology. They are converting the next generation to their faith.


7 posted on 03/21/2015 3:25:46 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

DENIERS!
8 posted on 03/21/2015 3:37:13 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The science is SETTLED, Global Warming is TOTAL BS.


9 posted on 03/21/2015 3:38:28 PM PDT by EXCH54FE (Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Obama Warns About Sea Level Rise From Global Warming … Buys Beachfront Mansion In Hawaii

...Obama has long warned that sea level rises caused by man-made global warming will make storm surges and flooding worse for coastal communities. In his 2015 State of the Union speech, Obama said “we’ll continue to see rising oceans, longer, hotter heat waves, dangerous droughts and floods

13 posted on 03/21/2015 4:14:31 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
"Model parameters, randomly drawn to represent uncertainty in understanding, demonstrates that a forcing more negative than −1.0 W m−2 is implausible, as it implies that none of the approximately 0.3 K temperature rise between 1850 and 1950 can be attributed to northern-hemispheric forcing."

*scratching head*…So since it had little effect back then, it shouldn't be assumed to now?

14 posted on 03/21/2015 4:29:43 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

17 posted on 03/21/2015 5:19:14 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason ("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

It won’t make one damn bit of difference to Congress or lawmakers because they have created one hell of a money making scheme that can be milked 90 ways to nothing. All they have to do is convince one half of the population that its real to keep the money conveyor belt rolling so they keep fleecing the other half that has to pay for it in higher taxes. Unfortunately its the one half knee-jerk reactionists that are afraid the sky is falling that have no common sense that votes to keep them in power.


18 posted on 03/21/2015 6:13:18 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
...– finds that the effects of aerosols on climate are much smaller than those in almost all the computer models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

A new paper but not the first paper to debunk radiative forcing.

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide - Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts? By Timothy Ball

No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)

The missing hotspot (JoNova)

Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.

Sky-high hole blown in AGW theory?

"Forbes reports on a peer-reviewed study that uses NASA data to show that the effects of carbon-based warming have been significantly exaggerated. In fact, much of the heat goes out into space rather than stay trapped in the atmosphere, an outcome that started long before AGW alarmists predicted:"

That article explains why no Hot Spot has been found.

The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'

It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming

Simple Chemistry and the Real Greenhouse Effect.

Those five articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.

19 posted on 03/21/2015 6:28:00 PM PDT by TigersEye (STONE COLD ZOMBIE SCOURGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Based upon Climate Change fanaticism, how much ppms of CO2 would have to be in the atmosphere to raise the Earth’s temperature to the levels it was at when the Vikings farmed Greenland? What is the difference between 400 ppm of CO2, and the levels of CO2 needed to optimize the atmosphere for plant growth? Greenhouses use 1500 ppm.

How many climate scientists does it take to get a prediction right?

What is the global warming scam really about? Scams, especially one as extensive and obsequious as global warming, have to have an end game.


20 posted on 03/21/2015 6:36:17 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

While I have not read the report yet, I do remember that ‘aerosols’ are a natural result of burning hydrocarbons. In other words, it’s frickin’ natural! It’s a part of the whole. This also reminds me of the old scare mongering about eggs and cholesterol. Too many eggs raises one’s cholesterol and leads to death. Later, some other brainiac determined that lecithin cuts cholesterol, and.....guess what!?!? A major source of dietary lecithin is found in......yes.....you guessed it......eggs! Once again, nature balances itself.


21 posted on 03/21/2015 11:16:23 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson