Posted on 02/27/2015 7:13:20 AM PST by WhiskeyX
So God is a criminal? Is that a new DNC talking point?
Glad I've gotten a lot of reloading components...
I know you're parroting them and making fun, but that stuff makes my blood boil. They are PURPOSELY LYING and impugning our motives. This crap is going to lead to a civil war!
According to the NRA article this ban would reach far beyond the intended green tipped armor piercing bullets by reinterpreting the regulations to include any non-lead centerfire bullet that can be interpreted to have the capability of penetrating some form of armored vest. The NRA article concludes this reinterpretation would encompass most of the centerfire non-lead ammunition, while another action would ban the lead ammunition.
*The “problem” with the AR-15 is that it is a very effective tyranny deterrent.*
And its very popular a lot of Citizens own them.
By the way, you are no competent judge, of what I do or do not need in bullets. Same arguement from Cuomo, *you dont need more than 7 bullets in a magazine to hunt* The school bus was blown up by a person.
Stay out of my house and my life!
Truth be told .223 cal. is child’s play. I wise man once told me anything less than 30.06 is for the lesser man.
100 Heads Life and Casualty Company.
Google it. Spread it around.
I don’t think that is the point. I think they are pushing a narrative. The narrative isn’t “ban all guns” but “unrestricted gun rights is dangerous and the people who support it are crazy people who deserve ridicule”. If they can get that narrative to spin up, they can use it to bully the center into silence while they pass “common sense” gun laws. If you are a “moderate”, you don’t want to be associated with the “nuts” who become the subject of derision on the popular shows.
This has been a strategy of the Left on Global Warming, Same Sex Marriage, Obama, etc.
the only thing that is ever going to stop this BS is to hold the responsible individuals CRIMINALLY liable. As it is, they do whatever the hell they want and the citizenry has to spend millions on lawyers.. for BOTH sides since we fund the a-holes. there is no incentive to tread lightly, all they do is "resign" with a full pension and offer of a higher paying job somewhere else when they get busted. they are paid scapegoats and lose nothing when they pull this sh$#@%.
The facts are M855 is the only one being reclassified. Everything else is just conjecture.
This is just a diversion from something else.
Well aware of the context. Glad to hear from others who are as well. “I’ve got a little list...”
I AM the lesser man, but I can still kill a tyrant's stooge come to kill me with my AR-15. I don't shoot .308 rifles well, because I don't have the upper body strength. But I can shoot the AR-15 very accurately, ringing steel on every round in a magazine at 100 yards.
There are guns for everyone. One size does not fit all.
I wise man once told me anything less than 30.06 is for the lesser man.
I AM the lesser man, but with my AR-15, I can still kill a tyrant's stooge come to kill me. I don't shoot .308 rifles well, because I don't have the upper body strength. But I can shoot the AR-15 very accurately, ringing steel on every round in a magazine at 100 yards.
There are guns for everyone. One size does not fit all.
I don’t like it but this being called the “End of the AR15” is unwarranted.
I’m talking about calibers not guns. Point being if the .223 ammo is regulated, regardless of the platform, it would be reasonable to expect “them” to come after everything bigger.
You have not been paying attention to California, which is where they often try new stuff out. CA has a partial and probably soon to be total ban on lead cored bullets on an environmental basis. The plan appears to be:
1. Ban steel-core ammo as ‘armor piercing.’
2. Ban lead core ammo as ‘an environmental pollitant.’
3. ‘You can have your AR-15s, but it will bankrupt you to shoot them’ because the only option left is bismuth and that’s expensive.
Of course they are doing that.
I saw someone shoot one of these bullets and it went back in time and killed a Pharaoh. Why would anyone need a time traveling Pharaoh killing bullet?
It sounds absurd but that’s the hook. If you can get people to accept your premise, you can lead them by the nose to your conclusion.
It’s like this conversation I had with someone:
Them: Why do you need an assault weapon? They are solely made to kill lots of people.(faulty premise)
Me: The police have them. Do they need to kill lots of us?
If I can get you to agree with me that citizens don’t need a specific type of bullet that can pierce a vest, I can get you to ban all bullets that I can prove will pierce a vest?
>>So God is a criminal? Is that a new DNC talking point?
“There is no god but the Czar!”
https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#hl=en&q=There+is+no+god+but+the+Tzar
Meet the new Boss, Same as the old Ba’al
—The Who?
“..I don’t like it but this being called the “End of the AR15” is unwarranted...”
True.
But right NOW, it’s 62 grain.
Next, it’ll be 55 grain.
Then the 77gr if you can find it.
Then it’ll be 7.62 NATO, the 7.62x63 (.30-06), and so on and so on.
He has a little less than two years to do as much damage as he can. And he means to do it.
Thanks...and I didn't even have to provide a definition for you. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.