Senator Settelmeyer’s Nevada Legislative Firearms update
SB141 Revises provisions governing certain dangerous or deadly weapons.
Senator Gustavson’s bill allows for the possession of switchblade knives and removes dirks, daggers, and machetes from the list of prohibited items that can be carried concealed. It has been sent to Senate Judiciary and has a hearing scheduled for February 27h at 1:00 pm
SB143 Revises provisions governing concealed firearms.
Senator Gustavson’s Constitutional Carry bill has bent sent to the Senate Judiciary committee and is not yet scheduled for a meeting.
SB171 Revises provisions governing the issuance of permits to carry concealed firearms.
Senator Settelmeyer’s bill creates reciprocity for anyone who is 21 years old and has a CCW from another jurisdiction. Additionally it eliminates Clark County’s gun registration program. It has been sent to Senate Judiciary and has a hearing scheduled for February 25th at 1:00 pm
SB175 Makes various changes relating to public safety.
Senator Roberson’s bill is a domestic violence gun bill. It prevents individuals convicted of domestic violence from purchasing a firearm. It extends the Castle Doctrine to automobiles. It creates reciprocity for anyone who is 21 years old and has a CCW from another jurisdiction, and eliminates Clark County’s gun registration program. It has been sent to Senate Judiciary and has a hearing scheduled for February 25th at 1:00 pm
SB176 Revises provisions governing certain dangerous or deadly weapons.
Senator Settelmeyer’s bill allows for the possession of switchblade knives, authorizes belt buckle knives, and preempts counties or municipalities from passing knife laws. It has been sent to Senate Judiciary and has a hearing scheduled February 27th at 1:00 pm
AB100 Requires the Attorney General to bring an action to protect and secure certain constitutional rights of residents of this State under certain circumstances.
Assemblyman Ellison’s bill seeks to have the Attorney General’s office protect Second amendment rights. It has been sent to Assembly Government Affairs and is not yet scheduled for a meeting.
AB127 Provides for the uniform regulation of firearms in the State of Nevada.
Speaker Hambrick’s bill eliminates the gun registration requirement in Clark County, has been sent to Assembly Government Affairs, and is not yet scheduled for a meeting.
AB139 Revises provisions governing the issuance of permits to carry concealed firearms.
Assemblyman Wheeler’s bill allows for reciprocity with other state CCW permits. It has been sent the Assembly Judiciary committee and has a hearing scheduled on February 25th at 8:00 am
AB148 Revises provisions governing concealed firearms. (BDR 20-242)
Assemblywoman Fiore’s bill allows a law enforcement department to give information about courses on handgun safety, and also allows for the carrying of a firearm with a permit on university property, or other areas. The bill has bent sent to the Assembly Judiciary committee and is not yet scheduled for a meeting.
Assemblywoman Dickman has a bill draft request to revise provisions governing firearms; details are not yet released.
Assemblyman Ellison has a bill draft request to revise provisions relating to permits to carry concealed firearms; details are not yet released.
Sadly or politically, there's nothing yet proposed that would counter the 2016 ballot initiative for universal background checks that will stop all criminals from ever, ever getting a gun and put an immediate stop to all domestic violence cases. Well, at least that's what nannie bloomers and the mommies of intervention claim.
But they do stop rapists.
Define “don’t”
I fail to see why this should prevent female campus students from deciding such things for themselves.
If she has one, aims and pulls the trigger it will.
I guess we can only have this discussion when women aren't being raped? The owner of this quote is sick in his opportunism.
Women do not want "redress of grievance" as is the norm for our Constitutional mechanics; they prefer to construct a legal environment where they never have to face a grievance in the first place.
Of course, to do this everyones freedoms must be curtailed.
If a woman does not have the intestinal fortitude to shoot her rapist, it is not disprove the effectiveness of a gun to prevent rape.
--I am wondering and am going to suggest to my reps that, since the petition measure has to go to a vote or be acted on , can it be enacted with no penalties of any kind for a "violation"--
It’s all in the aim.
The gun does not stop the attempted rape; it ENDS the intended rape with a 9mm/.40 S&W/.45 ACP myocardial infarction or a late life castration.
Guns don’t stop rape?
They do if the intended victim shoots the attacker’s privates off. I promise.