Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman
--"Sadly or politically, there's nothing yet proposed that would counter the 2016 ballot initiative for universal background checks that will stop all criminals from ever, ever getting a gun and put an immediate stop to all domestic violence cases. Well, at least that's what nannie bloomers and the mommies of intervention claim. "

--I am wondering and am going to suggest to my reps that, since the petition measure has to go to a vote or be acted on , can it be enacted with no penalties of any kind for a "violation"--

12 posted on 02/22/2015 9:14:30 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rellimpank

I posed a question to senator Settelmeyer about any possible action that this session could take to circumvent the proposal that will appear on the ‘16 ballot. He told me that the legislature had the option to enact it as written or ignore it and if ignored it goes on the ballot as written for the IPOS/SPOS to vote on. One can almost hear the trucks from out of state warming up to bring in the tons of cash that bloomers and the mommies and the margabby kelly-giffords puppet show will be “donating” to such a fine cause. I’ve also read that I-594 in Washington is causing all sorts of issues that nobody foresaw(and the anti’s don’t care as long as there is an impediment to our rights in place). But it’s the law for now.


13 posted on 02/22/2015 9:32:13 AM PST by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson