Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After West Virginia Oil Train Derailment, Sign Keystone Bill
Investor's Business Daily ^ | February 19, 2015 | IBD EDITORIALS

Posted on 02/19/2015 11:08:19 AM PST by raptor22

Energy: Three million gallons of Bakken crude burning in rural West Virginia after an oil train derails in a snowstorm ought to underscore the environmental safety of replacing rail cars with the Keystone XL pipeline.

One of the reasons President Obama says he'll veto the Keystone pipeline bill that, as a result of last November's GOP electoral gusher, has found its way to his desk is that it will only carry Canadian crude to foreign markets and is not worth jeopardizing the environment.

Two things are wrong with that argument.

The first is that Keystone XL will also bring Bakken crude to the American market, accelerating the oil boom from fracking in the shale formation centered on North Dakota. This will make North America energy independent and the rest of the world less dependent on Middle Eastern oil, a matter of no small significance.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: North Dakota; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: bakken; crudeoil; derailment; energy; ibd; keystone; keystonepipeline; keystonexl; kxl; lynchburg; oil; oiltrain; opec; rail; shale; train; westvirginia; yeskxl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2015 11:08:19 AM PST by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Go for it; build a 3XL pipeline.....


2 posted on 02/19/2015 11:14:48 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Warren Buffett owns a good piece of them thar railroads and that beast has to be fed.


3 posted on 02/19/2015 11:14:50 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Obama doesn’t get the fact that we are “refiners”....


4 posted on 02/19/2015 11:17:52 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

And Buffett already gave Obama a BJ....


5 posted on 02/19/2015 11:18:01 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

No, no, you don’t understand - pollution from a leak in a pipeline is SO much worse than the equal amount lost in a train derailment.

Especially when the persons with an interest in rail transport of crude oil contribute more in political payoffs than the persons who have an interest in pipelines.


6 posted on 02/19/2015 11:18:53 AM PST by alloysteel (It isn't science, it's law. Rational thought does not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Stop pandering to special interests, and sign it! Finish the pipeline!


7 posted on 02/19/2015 11:23:00 AM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
The tree huggers are such an odd group. They love eagles unless they're killed by windmills; then it's collateral damage. They're all for trains as the environmental way to transport agricultural products and passengers unless they're being used to transport oil. When they explode, it's collateral damage to save us from pipelines.

If the DC crowd were serious about passing Keystone, they'd be doing it today. Any politician voting against it would be voting for massive deadly polluted ground transportation of oil.

8 posted on 02/19/2015 11:33:21 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Three million gallons of Bakken crude burning in rural West Virginia

1. I wonder what oil from North Dakota was doing in West Virginia.

2.The Keystine XL pipeline is is supposed to go from Alberta to Nebraska, where it will connect on to pipelines that go to Illinois and Texas. How is this going to help West Virginia?

9 posted on 02/19/2015 11:56:49 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

KEYSTONE PIPELINE PING


10 posted on 02/19/2015 11:57:13 AM PST by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken or facebook.com/danielsobieski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Think of all the carbon that was released by the burning oil.

It must have sped up global warming by a few years ///puke


11 posted on 02/19/2015 11:58:39 AM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Yea, I think I’ll sit on the beach tomorrow. /s


12 posted on 02/19/2015 12:17:53 PM PST by deweyfrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

The oil was on the train because it was being transported to a refinery, possible destinations include South Jersey, and refineries in the SE. Moving that oil to Texas will allow it to be put on ships there and floated to refineries on the US east coast.

I await correction from those more knowledgeable.


13 posted on 02/19/2015 12:53:57 PM PST by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Our country is criss crossed by thousands of miles of pipelines, many decades old. How many pipeline disasters do we have compared to rail accidents? The XL Pipeline will cross mainly farmland and rural areas while rail lines inevitably travel through populated areas. The environmental concerns about the pipeline are overblown


14 posted on 02/19/2015 1:23:49 PM PST by The Great RJ (Pants up...Don't loot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

(a) The derailment in West Virginia is an EXAMPLE (get it?) of the dangers of rail transport.
(B) If we don’t build Keystone XL, North Dakota oil will have to be shipped by dangerous rail.
(C) Therefore, it might be a good idea to build Keystone AND as many other pipelines as we need, even to carry oil to West Virginia.

Now, there, that’s not too many dots to connect, is it?


15 posted on 02/19/2015 2:05:49 PM PST by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken or facebook.com/danielsobieski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; granite; GreenFreeper; grjr21; I got the rope; IchBinEinBerliner; jaredt112; JayB; ...

KEYSTONE PIPELINE PING


16 posted on 02/19/2015 2:07:04 PM PST by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken or facebook.com/danielsobieski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

The same Greenies who would derail a train to prove how dangerous it is to ship oil by rail would not hesitate to blow up a pipeline to prove how dangerous it is to pipe oil.


17 posted on 02/19/2015 2:09:26 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Three million gallons of Bakken crude burning in rural West Virginia after an oil train derails in a snowstorm ought to underscore the environmental safety of replacing rail cars with the Keystone XL pipeline.

Utter nonsense, of course. The Keystone Pipeline won't go anywhere near Virginia, which is where the crude oil was headed.

What it does underscore is the apparent problem keeping railcars on the tracks.

At least it wasn't Hydroflouric acid, or anhydrous ammonia, or any one of a number of far nastier substances shipped by rail.

There is currently a trend shifting toward more durable railcars, or modified ones which can better resist the effects of wrecking the train, but the bottom line is that the cargo isn't a problem if the train just stays on the tracks.

One last thing--cleanup will be easier after the crude burns off than it would be if the fire was put out (and less dangerous, too).

18 posted on 02/19/2015 3:26:21 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
I don't know how much Buffett holds of CSX (the rail line that had the derailment). Was that them who had the one near Danville, VA last year?

Buffett holds a chunk of BNSF.

19 posted on 02/19/2015 3:28:36 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
1. I wonder what oil from North Dakota was doing in West Virginia.

Going to a refinery in Virginia. Just passing through.

20 posted on 02/19/2015 3:30:16 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson