Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/19/2015 11:08:19 AM PST by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: raptor22

Go for it; build a 3XL pipeline.....


2 posted on 02/19/2015 11:14:48 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Warren Buffett owns a good piece of them thar railroads and that beast has to be fed.


3 posted on 02/19/2015 11:14:50 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Obama doesn’t get the fact that we are “refiners”....


4 posted on 02/19/2015 11:17:52 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

No, no, you don’t understand - pollution from a leak in a pipeline is SO much worse than the equal amount lost in a train derailment.

Especially when the persons with an interest in rail transport of crude oil contribute more in political payoffs than the persons who have an interest in pipelines.


6 posted on 02/19/2015 11:18:53 AM PST by alloysteel (It isn't science, it's law. Rational thought does not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Stop pandering to special interests, and sign it! Finish the pipeline!


7 posted on 02/19/2015 11:23:00 AM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
Three million gallons of Bakken crude burning in rural West Virginia

1. I wonder what oil from North Dakota was doing in West Virginia.

2.The Keystine XL pipeline is is supposed to go from Alberta to Nebraska, where it will connect on to pipelines that go to Illinois and Texas. How is this going to help West Virginia?

9 posted on 02/19/2015 11:56:49 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

KEYSTONE PIPELINE PING


10 posted on 02/19/2015 11:57:13 AM PST by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken or facebook.com/danielsobieski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Think of all the carbon that was released by the burning oil.

It must have sped up global warming by a few years ///puke


11 posted on 02/19/2015 11:58:39 AM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Our country is criss crossed by thousands of miles of pipelines, many decades old. How many pipeline disasters do we have compared to rail accidents? The XL Pipeline will cross mainly farmland and rural areas while rail lines inevitably travel through populated areas. The environmental concerns about the pipeline are overblown


14 posted on 02/19/2015 1:23:49 PM PST by The Great RJ (Pants up...Don't loot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave; granite; GreenFreeper; grjr21; I got the rope; IchBinEinBerliner; jaredt112; JayB; ...

KEYSTONE PIPELINE PING


16 posted on 02/19/2015 2:07:04 PM PST by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken or facebook.com/danielsobieski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

The same Greenies who would derail a train to prove how dangerous it is to ship oil by rail would not hesitate to blow up a pipeline to prove how dangerous it is to pipe oil.


17 posted on 02/19/2015 2:09:26 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
Three million gallons of Bakken crude burning in rural West Virginia after an oil train derails in a snowstorm ought to underscore the environmental safety of replacing rail cars with the Keystone XL pipeline.

Utter nonsense, of course. The Keystone Pipeline won't go anywhere near Virginia, which is where the crude oil was headed.

What it does underscore is the apparent problem keeping railcars on the tracks.

At least it wasn't Hydroflouric acid, or anhydrous ammonia, or any one of a number of far nastier substances shipped by rail.

There is currently a trend shifting toward more durable railcars, or modified ones which can better resist the effects of wrecking the train, but the bottom line is that the cargo isn't a problem if the train just stays on the tracks.

One last thing--cleanup will be easier after the crude burns off than it would be if the fire was put out (and less dangerous, too).

18 posted on 02/19/2015 3:26:21 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking; StopGlobalWhining; Straight Vermonter; Tampa Caver; TChris; ...

KEYSTONE PIPELINE PING


21 posted on 02/19/2015 3:37:11 PM PST by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken or facebook.com/danielsobieski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson