Posted on 02/14/2015 9:02:53 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine
Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man's stewardship of the environment. But we know that's not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this. At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...
I cant get link to work.
I knew this ten years ago. I must be a genius.
Hmmm...works for me!
You might go ogle the title and see if you can have it work for you.
Actually the pinhead is wrong.
The Bolshevik party tried to change the world economic model 100 years ago.
The ruins of their experiment can be seen all across Russia.
Surprise, surprise - not.
Just follow the $$
Bookmark
This has been obvious to anyone with a functioning brain.
“Just follow the $$”
************
Absolutely true!
Who financed the Bolsheviks and other collectivists in other countries to impose collectivism on the world during the 19th and 20th centuries?
The elites! They are the biggest proponents of it and are using AGW/climate change as another way to scam people into accepting collectivism.
There are more reasons why “global warming” MUST be “settled science.” Environmental “scientists” have to keep those grants flowing, and the shadowy money people who have invested billions in various “global warming” products and schemes must make their expected profits. Or they will be very unhappy.
what the alarmists don’t tell us is that man is only responsible for 0.0037% of the CO2 in the atmosphere (we are responsible for only 3.4% of the total atmospheric CO2 which is only 0.04% of the total atmosphere- so 3.4% divided by 0.04% = 0.0037% of TOTAL AMOSPHERIC CO2- This means that nature is responsible for the rest 99.9963%- so can someone please explain to me how our contribution of just 0.0037% makes us, in the words of the alarmists “Almost 100% responsible for global climate change”?
Folks- our atmosphere has only 0.04% CO2 in it- NOWHERE near enough CO2 to be trapping ANY significant amount of heat and ‘back radiating’ it to earth to ‘warm the global climates’
0.04% simply is NOT enough to affect the climate one iota- MOST of the esaping heat from earth goes right on out into space- because only a tiny fraction of our atmosphere has any CO2 in it- not even 1% of the atmosphere has CO2 in it-
It is a myth that there is a ‘big thick blanket of CO2 surrounding our planet trapping all the heat, and back radiating it to earth-
We knew that all along. But the low-information lemmings don't know, and I daresay they wouldn't care at any rate. Such is the awesome power of human stupidity.
[[You might go ogle the title and see if you can have it work for you.]]
I tried ogling the title but to no avail - it slapped me
“... the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.”.
Where do those asshats think their own money comes from, perhaps leaves falling from a tree? If it were not FOR capitalist, where would they be?
If CO2 is sooooo good at reflecting heat why don’t the manufacturers of double and triple-pane windows use it instead of argon to fill the gaps in between the panes?
See if you can get onto IBD’s front page.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.