Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why 3 Supreme Court Justices Didn’t Attend the State of the Union
MSN ^ | 20 JAN 2015 | Tessa Berenson

Posted on 01/21/2015 7:48:57 AM PST by South40

The wording in the Constitution is simple and straightforward: the President “shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union.” There's nothing in there about the Supreme Court justices and, accordingly, there's nothing simple and straightforward about their attendance.

This year, six justices were in attendance, while three of the most conservative members of the court, Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito were noticeably absent. In the modern era, custom has held that the justices would show up in their official robes and sit impassively. But in recent years, they've become more resistant to the tradition.

Justice Antonin Scalia’s absence is no surprise. It was the 19th State of the Union in a row that he’s skipped since he considers the speech a “childish spectacle.”

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 114th; alito; bhoscotus; bhosotu; obama2015sotu; scalia; scotus; snub; sotu; thomas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 01/21/2015 7:48:57 AM PST by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: South40

It was their night to wash the cat ?


2 posted on 01/21/2015 7:50:55 AM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

Interesting that the Chief Justice traitor DID attend, isn’t it.


3 posted on 01/21/2015 7:51:02 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

childish spectacle.” “dittos”


4 posted on 01/21/2015 7:51:13 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

5 posted on 01/21/2015 7:51:43 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

If the framers wanted the president to brief the Judicial Branch, they used words very carefully, they would have written instead: “shall from time to time give to the Judiciary Information of the State of the Union”


6 posted on 01/21/2015 7:51:45 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Or, if they intended it, it would be written: “shall from time to time give jointly to the Congress and Judiciary, Information of the State of the Union”


7 posted on 01/21/2015 7:52:40 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: South40

The GOP should have followed their lead. What a waste of time listening to that tripe for an hour. They could have been drinking. :-)


8 posted on 01/21/2015 7:53:14 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

They were fresh out of barf bags.


9 posted on 01/21/2015 7:53:32 AM PST by defconw (If not now, WHEN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209; South40

” It was their night to wash the cat ? “

One had to go to the foot dentist to get his big toe filled......


10 posted on 01/21/2015 7:53:55 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: South40
Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito were noticeably absent.

Thanks for the info; interesting about Thomas and Alito but not surprised about Scalia. I joined them and left my TV off.
11 posted on 01/21/2015 7:54:08 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40
Justice Antonin Scalia... considers the speech a “childish spectacle.”

Amen Justice Scalia. You da man!

12 posted on 01/21/2015 7:55:14 AM PST by upchuck (Entrenched incumbency is the disease. Fresh blood is the cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Never heard the expression. Better than “I had to make soup.”


13 posted on 01/21/2015 7:55:50 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: South40
FROM TIME MAGAZINE:

Justice Antonin Scalia’s absence is no surprise. It was the 19th State of the Union in a row that he’s skipped since he considers the speech a “childish spectacle.”

Justice Clarence Thomas’s empty seat was also unsurprising. In 2012, Thomas said he doesn’t attend the annual event because “it has become so partisan and it’s very uncomfortable for a judge to sit there.”

Thomas’s remark gets to the heart of why the State of the Union has become a painful event for the justices: the address has become a “political pep rally

14 posted on 01/21/2015 7:56:29 AM PST by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Look at the frown on Robert face. He looks worried that maybe someone took compromising pictures of him when he was in college and Obama has them.


15 posted on 01/21/2015 7:59:09 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

He should be sick...he personally has relegated the working men and women of this country to a regimen of health care that won’t provide health, won’t provide care, but will provide more dollars for the entitlement system Tsar Obama wants to implement. His mother and father should be ashamed of him.


16 posted on 01/21/2015 8:01:06 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: South40

Was Chief Justice Roberts smiling on proudly?


17 posted on 01/21/2015 8:01:45 AM PST by uncitizen (When's the last time you heard: "It's a free country"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

SCOTUS.


18 posted on 01/21/2015 8:04:54 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
They could have been drinking. :-)

In this case, I would've even cut them some slack for toking on weed. We skipped the spectacle altogether and watched Hogan's Heros reruns.

Far more entertainment value and probably more realistic as well.

19 posted on 01/21/2015 8:05:57 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Well it took 3 martini’s to get me through it. Then I almost had to pour another one to get through the GOP rebuttal. All in all sad night for the Republic.


20 posted on 01/21/2015 8:09:17 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson