I’m pretty strict in my views on this. Voter fraud once gets you hard labor for a few months. Twice gets you a bullet.
Interesting. This is EXACTLY what a certain individual here at FR has been saying ad-nauseum in recent days and on many threads.
I wonder if he'll show up on this one...
More people are now living in empty lots in this country than are living in actual homes. Barry’s “fundamentally transformed” America.
Tell you lib friends that every fraudulent vote is VOTER SURPRESSION...
Maybe that will wake them up???
Voter fraud votes for Democrats. Why waste a good thing according to them.
The foundation of our republic is free and fair elections.
The penalty for voter fraud must be death.
This is a joke right?
They couldn’t actually win any other way because their record is crap and they are dead wrong on ALL the issues
The check's in the mail! I won't.......
A win's a win, in that very byword of the Left, "by any means necessary." If your most basic civil right is violated, well, too bad, your class (whatever that might be) has been violating somebody else's civil rights for a long time, so this is justified.
Clausewitz once stated that war is a continuation of politics by other means. For the Left, politics is a continuation of war by other means, and anything goes.
I Florida you cannot question someone who wants to vote in any way.
Wait, that “Tea Party” thing with the IRS, wasn’t that just a couple of rogue agents in Ohio? Not a smidgen of corruption.
Seems to me that one of the most abused people in that disgusting abuse of power was Catherine Engelbrecht of “True the Vote”. Maybe she had a good handle on things back in 2009 or so.
How many other "forgetful" Rat voters did NOT get caught?
Or to paraphrase our president, there is no voter fraud, period.
Unfortunately, voter fraud, more properly termed government fraud, is much more pernicious than this article suggests. As Lenin explained over eighty years ago, “It only matters who counts the votes.”(sic) States have the responsibility for administering elections, and George Soros invested in picking state’s attorney’s general over ten years ago.
Think about it. Once a vote is cast, whether by mail, by marking a ballot, or touching a screen it is no longer traceable. Once we had paper ballots that could be recounted. Yes, boxes of ballots could be and were lost, but each local precinct counted those ballots before they went home, and before the ballots were sent, under guard, to a bonded warehouse. Today, with electronic voting, there is no precinct oversight.
If the NSA can monitor every packet sent over the internet, they can access voting data, if it even exists, using mechanisms most engineers can explain. The bottom line is that unlike Germany, which returned to paper ballots, Israel, and a few other honest governments, our governments, with the some big crony friends like Google, is well along with a completely Internet-based voting systems. This permits absolutely no audit trail, and insures that there can be no trust that any election has validity.
It is sport in many university departments of electrical engineering to hack voting machines. No machines used in the U.S. have not been penetrated - easily. In a recent election a large number of the machines deployed were manufactured by a Venezuelan company. U.S. Federal courts have determined that the software deployed on computer-based machines could not be examined because it is protected intellectual property. The problem of how to protect the integrity of voting is an open problem. Only paper ballots, as agreed by the Germans, provide for an audit trail. Paper isn’t perfect, but depending upon the ethics of a bit on digital media is preying on the naivety of most citizens. Altering stored numbers, if those controlling the votes even bother, is trivial to a freshman computer science student.
Look at the many states reporting votes from 110% of eligible voters. Look at the fiasco of Alan West’s recent election, where the recounts changed, by large percentages, with every recount, and West was not allowed access even to the precinct results, presumably machine-generated. There are thousands of reported examples, dating from before the excellent book “Votescam”, which documented and federal involvement in fixing an election in Broward County, where voting machines were fixed and the count reported before several precincts had even reported.
We are not a representative republic any longer. Both major political parties are complicit in eliminating that inconvenience of public preferences.
Anyone heard of voter fraud going in the other direction - voting DemoRat and having it changed to Republican? Anyone?
No voter fraud on the Left....?
Hahahahahahahahaha!
Oh, thanks - I needed a good laugh.
The left defends the most liberal voter policies possible as if their lives depended on it. When every other rational argument has been applied, and yet they still defend the indefensible, you know the only thing left is that they depend on cheating to win.
The one that always gets me is when they say “there’s no evidence voter impersonation occurs”. When you don’t look for it, and there’s no method, system or document to check, OF COURSE there’s no evidence it’s happening.
Imagine Barney Fife asleep at the station as the sole deputy on-duty for the graveyard shift, while cars and trucks drive un-checked on the 4-lane highway that passes thru town. According to liberal logic, clearly none are speeding because none have been caught, and no tickets have been issued.
RIDICULOUS!
re: “can’t the computer systems find these issues?” After the Bush-Gore election, Sen Chris Dodd pushed through HAVA - Help America Vote Act. This spends hundreds of millions...maybe billions.. on voter hardware and software. You may be surprised to learn that Dodd’s Conneticut friend Jerry Long of PCC said “It’s as if it were written specifically for me.”
Move-on.org lashed out at the Diebold hardware it funded... until Move-on discovered that is was engineered precisely for the automated vote-switching by Dodd’s friends.
PCC does the software. Its contracts say the software will be developed in the US. But one wonders why the Indian team-leads in CT are always going to India. How many dying relatives can they possibly have? And while there, it sure seems like they are in closer direct supervision of the developers than when they are in the US.
The software is a mess. The result is that elections are a mess. Nobody knows who is registered and who isn’t. In that ambiguity a person can always claim “The computer lost my registration” ... And you know what, it might be true.
A Republican official in an effort to be bi-partisan and work with the Democrats in control of election software took the HAVA money as FREE MONEY he didn’t have to beg the legislature for. So he took the 30 pieces of silver. (Did the staff person who convinced him to take the 30 pieces get more than 30 for himself when he left the Republican staff for a juicy position at PCC?”)
When the civil rights groups scream “racism” they are not aware that it is a setup their own side has arranged... and a trap the Republican has fallen into.