Posted on 10/10/2014 1:57:19 PM PDT by NYer
Archaeologists have uncovered one of the earliest-known images of Jesus in the town of Cástulo in Andalusia, Spain. The image, engraved on a glass plate known as a paten, shows a beardless, short-haired Jesus.
The archaeologists estimate the 8.6-inch paten is from the fourth century C.E., and they suspect it was used to hold Eucharistic bread. The image shows Jesus in a philosopher's toga, along with two other — also beardless — male figures, whom researchers suspect are Peter and Paul, two of Jesus' apostles. All three of the men are depicted with halos. "The scene takes place in the celestial orb, framed between two palm trees, which in Christian iconography represent immortality, the afterlife, and heaven, among other things," the archaeologists said in a statement.
The paten is the earliest depiction that has been found in Spain, Discovery News reports, and it is "in an excellent state of preservation," with 81 percent of its original contents restored. The paten is now on display at the Archaeological Museum of Linares. --Meghan DeMaria
Early Image of Beardless Jesus Found: http://t.co/j5K0t20NFc pic.twitter.com/oTOH1GkgzS — Discovery News (@DNews) October 5, 2014
Now there's an answer I didn't expect.
Latin in AD no biggie. Doesn’t matter one way or other. I just see it more in liberal stuff than any other sources ...
Don't quit the day job.
If I were to draw a picture today of John Rolfe marrying Pocohantas in Jamestown — never having laid eyes on either of them — how accurate do you think the image would be?
Same for the 4th century whiskers, or lack thereof.
Evidence of an attempt to dislodge BC and AD from the English vernacular.
I think we won’t have to bother with shaving in heaven.
I always tell them the Constitution mentions the little baby Jesus.
10 yard penalty for roughing the apostrophe.
Turkey says the Armenian Death March is a myth. Modern day Nazis say the Holocaust is a myth. And now Catholics say the Holocaust is now a myth. Ya right
Thanks to both of you.
I am not saying He didn’t have a beard.
I was looking for something more explicit from the NT.
But I think the prophetic verse you cited is all there is.
The archaeologists estimate the 8.6-inch paten is from the fourth century C.E...Yes, I do make my own fun.
No, I think he meant only Catholics paint Halo's, but I have to imagine other faiths are involved in the artistry... :0)
I remember years ago seeing a pendant around the neck of our friendly neighbourhood grandma. It was a gold rectangle, about 2” x 1” and it had the face of Christ emboldened on it.
I told her that this was the first depiction of Jesus that I have ever seen that was believable, that actually struck me as being the real Jesus.
Grandma told me that the imprint was replicated from the shroud. That’s when, in my simple way, I decided it was authentic.
And they sure had some snappy choreography... :0)
This is not surprising. Many of the early depictions of Our Lord showed Him looking rather Roman, including beardless. In the East, at least, the preference for the familiar bearded depiction came from two sources — the Palestinian school of iconography, and the Icon-not-made-by-hands, which according to Holy Tradition Jesus made by pressing a cloth to His face in response to a request from King Abgar of Edessa, where the relic was preserved.
I agree. Beard or no beard it is the same as Toe-mae-toe / Toe-ma-toe. Does it really matter? How does His facial hair, or lack thereof, impact or affect His message of salvation?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.