Posted on 09/04/2014 9:53:06 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
The Guardian reported last week that British extremists were among the most vicious and vociferous fighters in the ranks of Isis. But this we knew. For UK Muslims, the fact that James Foleys executioner spoke with a London accent was a public relations disaster. It wasnt great for Britain, either, which is now routinely accused by Americans of harbouring an enemy within.
Then came Rotherham. Its no secret that Asian grooming gangs have been targeting white girls on sink estates but until last month social workers and the police conspired to keep the full truth from us. They protected Pakistani elders who turned a blind eye to organised rape. Why?
The press blame political correctness, but there is a more specific explanation. The authorities were terrified that grooming would be seized upon by racists playing the Muslim card. Their fears werent unfounded. In 2004 the British National Party won a council seat in Keighley West with 51 per cent of the vote by exploiting local outrage over a grooming scandal. Its tactics were crafty. In BNP leaflets, the adjective Pakistani was replaced by Muslim. Nick Griffin praised Sikh and Hindu activists who had tried to draw attention to the Muslim sex gangs.
The BNP has since imploded, but not before popularising the idea that the sexual appetites of Pakistani thugs were fuelled by Islam. American conservatives picked over the Koran looking for parallels between the violence of gang rape and the violence of jihad. Islamic scholars dismissed this as a violation of their scriptures. Inconveniently for them, however, Muslim street gangs in Europe and America started playing the same game, arguing that the Koran permitted any assault against the kuffar (non-believers).
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.co.uk ...
I doubt it.
As i recall, in the UK scolding a muslim is illegal, as is griping about UK immigration policy.
1 out of 4 children under 4 is Muslim and their birthrates are significantly larger than the rest of the country. It’s only a matter of time.
What a stupid article.
The author is actually more concerned about how “tolerance” and “diversity” will suffer because of the horrific crimes of Muslims, rather than the effects of the crimes on the victims themselves.
This is where liberals’ priorities lie.
Not so in Europe.
They don’t have a Constitution and could turn feral against muzzies in no time.
Watch volunteers from all over the world joining at Europe’s side.
Don’t, people here will think you are telling the truth.
Winnie was right.
Huh? They are 4.4% of the population in Britain.
It’s, as always, unbearable reading the British right wing as it is reading the British left wing. They are very different from our right wing and I hope most Americans know that.
"We are a Religion of Peace, and we'll kill you if you disagree!"
Islam is a gutter "religion".
What woke them up?
There are muslims in Britain? Who knew?!
Hardening the heart is step one, followed by sharpening swords, arming bombs, and locking onto each and every muslim.
Each and every Muslim.
Each and every Muslim.
Engage.
Pakistani and Asian in UK don't (mostly) refer to immigrants from those countries. It refers to racial/ethnic groups, most of the members of which were born in UK.
That picture is from the Madrid train bombings of 2004.
I'm not following your comment.
Regardless, I'm certain these victims would derive great comfort from John Kerry's recent words about islam's peaceful nature.
For now. Look at the birth rates.
Them too...
:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.