Posted on 07/16/2014 8:13:04 AM PDT by mandaladon
David Simas, director of the White House Office of Political Strategy and Outreach, will not comply with the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reforms subpoena for him to testify, White House Counsel Neil Eggleston said in a letter Tuesday to panel Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.).
The committees effort to compel Mr. Simass testimony threatens longstanding interests of the executive branch in preserving the presidents independence and autonomy, as well as his ability to obtain candidate advice and counsel to aid him in the discharge of his constitutional duties, Eggleston wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
I had know idea these subpoenas have no real legal authority. So, they are really just requests?
know = no
:-P
>> This is going to be interesting...
It might indeed be interesting if a gutsy, effective leader were in charge of the investigation.
But given Darryl Issa’s track record of non-accomplishment, it’ll probably be a big nothingburger. Like all the others so far.
For your edification:
It is complicated and ........... political
http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34097.pdf
The EXEMPT have a choice.
Continued Kabuki in the face of Obama’s declared
CW2 against the People, the Flag and Constitution
that the Dear One hates,
or
Live up to their Oaths to Defend the Constitution,
the Border, the Laws, and the People.
When will you guys understand? Laws are for the little people, not for the ruling class.
It just gets ever more blatant.
The jail in the capitol building has been closed since the bankruptcy of 1933.
Post of the year!
++++
Well we now know that the Politico spellchecker works. But we're not surprised that their editors don't actually read the copy they publish.
This article did not, but I saw an article where the White House Counsel said there was precedent going back to Nixon, etc. Pretty interesting they would use that reference..
Keep chiseling away Issa. Let’s get them to claiming “Executive Privilege.” Even low info voters know Executive Privilege is code for guilty.
“immune from congressional compulsion to testify on matters relating to his official duties
Issa wants to compel Simas to testify about violations of the Hatch Act. Eggleston’s claim of immunity is an admission of guilt, since it means the White House defines criminal violations of the Hatch Act as “official duties”. I didn’t realize Simas had actually been advising the President about how to violate the Hatch Act as part of his job. The White House will do almost anything to avoid another public spectacle of their minions plead the Fifth.
“The jail in the capitol building has been closed since the bankruptcy of 1933. “
Then Issa should, very publicly, send in crews to fix it up and get it ready for some “visitors.” Just a little threat, ya know?
Didn’t the colonists hang more than a few tyrannical “agents of the crown” in the process of Revolution?
Just read a summary of the Hatch Act.
The democrat party is just one big violation of the Hatch Act.
It’s their entire election strategy.
Think Oliver North.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.