Posted on 06/30/2014 12:22:51 PM PDT by PoloSec
(VIDEO)FULL TITLE: White House Press Secretary: The constitutional lawyer in the Oval Office disagrees with Supreme Court on Hobby Lobby (VIDEO)////
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said on Monday that the “constitutional lawyer in the Oval Office” disagrees with the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in favor of Hobby Lobby.
“There are now a group of women of an indeterminate size who no longer have access to free contraceptive coverage simply because of some religious views that are held not by them, necessarily, but by their bosses.
“We disagree and the constitutional lawyer in the Oval Office disagrees with that conclusion from the Supreme Court, primarily because he’s concerned about the impact that it could have on the health of those women,” Earnest said.
caugh of laugh at 22 in video
“....a group of women of an indeterminate size....”
English, the forgotten language.
Maybe he is taking Michelle as his starting point.
sorry...cough or laugh at 22 sec into tape.
notice josh is trying to keep a straight face as well.
In EVERY case, there’s always ONE lawyer who disagrees with the ruling.................
“There are now a group of women of an indeterminate size”
This screams for it’s own thread... with photos.
“constitutional lawyer”?????????? The bum was (at best) a sometime lecturer. Didn’t he turn-in his license to avoid further problems with the bar (as did his beard, moochelle)? But, hey...who really knows???? This anti-Free-America creep’s history is sealed.
No wonder lawyers have such self regard! When I was in college we addressed Professor as Professor. We addressed Doctors as Doctors and other teachers as Mr. or Mrs. No one got away with addressing a non-Professor as Professor!
If he had said that there IS now instead of there ARE now. LOL
Just about everything the Left loves can ultimately be traced back to their moronic belief in overpopulation, and disbelief in God’s command to be fruitful and multiply, therefore calling God a liar.
That’s why birth control and baby murder are so important to them. That’s why homosexuality is so important to them. Both eliminate human beings from the population prematurely, a desired goal. Additionally, murdered babies can’t produce offspring, nor can homosexuals, so they’re both VERY desired behaviors, as far as their sick minds are concerned.
This is also why they’ll inevitably support incest (since the offspring will likely die young), bestiality (since there will be no offspring), and child molesting (since young children can’t get pregnant.)
If someone wants to dance and I’m not invited, let them pay the Piper! :^}
“There are now a group of women of an indeterminate size...”
Is that like “binders of women”?
Is Obama even licensed?
Plan B and Ella are pretty expensive when you use them as your only method of birth control, month after month.
The truth is men and women like having procreative sex, it is how we are designed, these drugs allow risky sex behavior with the promise of a pill to “fix” things after the deed.
Can someone show me the FDA studies proving no long term ill effects of using either of these two drugs as a primary birth control method?
“but by their bosses”
#getanotherjob
Getting lucky on 1 of 16 rulings doesn’t place his opinion in high regard.
Could the “Constitutional Lawyer” in the Oval Office please present ONE brief he has submitted to the Supreme Court? He was a lecturer at U Chicago, that’s it. It’s the lowest level on the academic totem pole, requiring no special expertise, just a friend who can get a job for you.
The Marxist, Mooslim, Kenyan, Steaming Pant Load disagrees with the Constitution.....
The bongo playing menthol smoker in the white hut disagrees?
I think this is another English error. Shouldn't it be "There IS now a group...", even if we don't know whether the women are size 18 or size 4.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.