Posted on 06/26/2014 8:35:33 PM PDT by Kevin in California
Chris McDaniel was on Hannity tonight and said they’ve already found over 1,000 votes that were cast by people who voted both in the Democratic primary and in the runoff last Tuesday.
We’re looking into the issue of whether or not people who participated in the June 3rd Democratic primary crossed over into the Republican primary this Tuesday night, and we’ve already found more than 1,000 examples of that in one county alone.
Cleveland is never in play in presidential elections. The only question is how many tens of thousands of votes the margin will be. You must be thinking of Philadelphia or somewhere else.
Another Freeper on this thread said he doubted any judge would order another election.
Right. Now I see what you’re saying. The 35,000 or so dems who voted in the runoff weren’t all apathetic voters who were stirred up to vote; some of them are politically attuned, voted in the dem primary, and were thus ineligible to vote but voted anyway because they are politically-interested - and are being found out by McDaniel.
personally I think most of those 30k DEM votes are mostly fake votes. Stolen identity and someone voted in their stead
That makes sense, unfortunately.
Court would have to toss out the votes entirely but there’s no way showing which candidate they voted for.
+++++++++
This may or may not be true. I have seen it disputed on other threads. In any case you have certainly pointed out the key issue in this case. It would be nice if someone could resolve it with certainty.
I doubt he even knows what planet he’s on..didn’t he say a few weeks ago as a child he had sex with animals?
I think most of he 35k dem votes are illegal . I like to check if they’re American citizen, not registered in multiple places, actually living in the state, not dead person votes etc
Thanks.
Drudge’s website isn’t working tonight for me to link anything. Anyone else having a problem?
Foot-dragging? Get a court injunction, extending the deadline. Die fighting.
That’s the word, shark, despicable! I can hardly breathe all my contempt for the Establishment R’s AND their voter enablers.
6700
“I don’t believe you can exclude any voters who are legitimate voters, no matter if they didn’t vote last time.”
**********************************************************************
We’re getting ahead of ourselves but, if the JUNE 24th RUN-OFF ELECTION has been found fraudulent, a good judge trying to do the equitable thing (of redoing the 6/24 runoff except for removing the votes of anyone who illegally voted) to “correct” the 6/24 run off, that good judge could exclude new voters .
Allowing NEW voters (who had not voted in the 6/24 runoff) would simply give new chances for the corrupticrat GOPe and DemocRATS to induce more Dims to enter the voting booth.
Leni
If this develops legs, you can count on Jesse Jackass, Rev. Al, and the ACLU to be on planes for Mississippi by early next week.
Thanks for the info.
I could see the GOP-e not endorsing or giving money (and that’s bad enough), but supporting the democrat?.....we would have another new low.
100% of precincts reporting
Cochran 191,508
McDaniel 184,815
Difference 6,693
“it’s gonna get a lot uglier real fast. No one there is gonna take that.”
No, it isn’t, and yes, they WILL take that...
The Sheeple only show up in the streets when the TV tells them to, (Or SEIU/ACORN pay them to), and there is no Dem agenda to be helped by urging that here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.