Posted on 06/24/2014 2:15:24 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
“Not wanting to side with the Moose, but this is silly.”
Yes, it is.
don’t have to be grasping at straws to find legit problems with the “O’s” - I would hope our side wouldn’t use such small potatoes stuff - sounds like a DU...and denigrates what we say when it IS legit.
This just plays into their hands.
Just about any “criticism” of these criminal degenerates is “legit”. They should be in prison, then exiled.
:: Next, shell say Hillary, that honky. ::
Not really. Hillary comes from Illinoios and Arkansas; she’s a “cracker”.
I bet she usually refers to Hitlery as “that -itch”.
There were movies made that used the ‘N’ word too - doesn’t make it acceptable.
Do you have a cite for this? My understanding is that Native Americans had no concept of property rights due to the collectivist nature of their cultures.
Give me a break. This article is simply stupid.
It is true. An Indian giver refers to a white man who repeatedly cheated Indians by giving them something by way of a treaty and then taking it back. It also doesn’t have any meaning in the opposite way because Indians at that time never had anything substantial to give away. I’m surprised you didn’t know that.
A citation is customarily provided for the benefit of those who are unfamiliar with the subject. You don’t know me, so your “surprise” is phony.
America is getting gypped...and that’s saying it nicely.
I’ve seen you post often enough to know you are a person with knowledge. So I am surprised you didn’t know this.
The correct term is Saltine-American
after so called palastinians, gypsys are the most worthless group of individuals on the planet. and i don’t care if that is politically incorrect.
Can Richard Roundtree be “Shafted”?
I agree. I'm no fan of hers, but this is just ridiculous.
“Do you have a cite for this? My understanding is that Native Americans had no concept of property rights due to the collectivist nature of their cultures.”
Guess I didn’t clearly make my point. The slur is a derogatory statement against the integrity of whites. Meaning whites did not keep their promises made to Indians. Hence, “Indian Giver” meaning whites give but then turn around and take back what they gave. History books are full of broken promises made by whites to Indians and then later broken. So, consequently, when the term was subsequently used it meant someone made a promise but did not honor it - as whites did to Indians. Hope I clarified :)
or ethnic?
Dang fingers.
Didnt this beyotch say that kids should snitch on their racially/ethnically insensative families?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.