Skip to comments.
'None of the Above' Wins Dem Primary for Governor in Nevada
Breitbart News ^
| June 12, 2014
| Debra Heine
Posted on 06/12/2014 7:17:56 PM PDT by This Just In
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
That about sums it up.
To: This Just In
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS !
A vote to ABSTAIN is a great idea!
2
posted on
06/12/2014 7:21:02 PM PDT
by
Graewoulf
(Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: Graewoulf
OH NO!!!!! It was a vote for OBAMAAAA!!!!!!
3
posted on
06/12/2014 7:22:44 PM PDT
by
Norm Lenhart
(How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
To: Graewoulf
“f they can help choose None Of The Above for a Gubernatorial Candidate....could it be POSSIBLE that they might at some point be able to Nominate” “None Of The Above “ as their U.S SENATE Candidate??
4
posted on
06/12/2014 7:23:20 PM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
To: This Just In
I’d take “none of the above” before I’d accept Reid.
5
posted on
06/12/2014 7:24:21 PM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: This Just In
OK, Nevada Freepers. Tell us what this means. Is the Democrat Party able to fill the nomination line with some committee assignment? Or does ‘None of the Above’ automatically take up their line in the General Election?
6
posted on
06/12/2014 7:26:21 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: This Just In
“Since “none of the above” can’t win under state law, virtual unknown, Goodman will be the nominee.”
What is the use of having a “none of the above” selection if you give the nominee to the next candidate? None of the above is a rejection of ALL of them therefore none of them should win.
7
posted on
06/12/2014 7:28:33 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: MeshugeMikey
Yup.
If “None of the above” receives 50 % plus one vote, than none of the names on the ballot can be placed on the next ballot, IMHO, of course.
8
posted on
06/12/2014 7:34:11 PM PDT
by
Graewoulf
(Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: This Just In
“none of the above” means a smoky back room deal from the Ruling Class. Although now the smoke isn’t from cigars....
9
posted on
06/12/2014 7:34:20 PM PDT
by
logic101.net
(How many more children must die on the altar of gun free zones?)
To: This Just In
10
posted on
06/12/2014 7:40:39 PM PDT
by
topher
(Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
To: Mrs. Don-o; Salvation; markomalley
11
posted on
06/12/2014 7:41:24 PM PDT
by
topher
(Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
To: This Just In
How funny!
Guess that means no opponent for the Republican candidate then.
12
posted on
06/12/2014 7:43:40 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: This Just In
Will “Monty” Brewster please pick up the black courtesy phone? “Monty” Brewster ...
13
posted on
06/12/2014 7:45:14 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi or Atty General Holder, who brought more guns to Mexico?)
To: This Just In
If "None of the above" wins an election for a real post, that post should be vacant for on election cycle.
What a wonderful way to downsize the government.
Too bad it does not downsize any departments with it.
14
posted on
06/12/2014 7:46:14 PM PDT
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: Graewoulf
“A vote to ABSTAIN is a great idea!”
It would be if the office could actually go unfilled. The nomination is going to the runner-up, the “none of the above” is simply a feel good protest vote. If a candidate remembers to vote for himself and the entire electorate besides the candidate votes “none of the above” the greedy little statist politician is still getting into office.
That’s really not too far removed from communist “elections”, we just bother throwing another party in the mix to give people the illusion of choice and representation.
Much better if the polity could actually vote to leave an office unfilled. We might actually see decent voter turnouts if the public could vote “Leave me the **** alone!”.
To: Vigilanteman
Or does ‘None of the Above’ automatically take up their line in the General Election? According to the article, "none of the above" cannot "win". Thus, the 2nd place finisher -- an unknown named Robert Goodman will be the nominee.
16
posted on
06/12/2014 7:55:50 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.)
To: This Just In
More of this needs to happen.
17
posted on
06/12/2014 8:17:31 PM PDT
by
al_c
(Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
To: This Just In
None of These Candidates cannot win under State law. So “Second to None” gets to go on to the general election.
To: This Just In
“I’m Robert Goodman and I approve this commercial, and at least I am better than nothing. Or worse, truth be told”
19
posted on
06/12/2014 8:33:23 PM PDT
by
Clay Moore
(I Like My Guns Like Obama Likes His Voters: Undocumented)
To: Norm Lenhart
OH NO!!!!! It was a vote for OBAMAAAA!!!!!!
20
posted on
06/12/2014 8:41:08 PM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson