Posted on 06/08/2014 11:05:49 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
In 1887, ex-slaves began petitioning the federal government for pensions and compensation for the years they had labored without wages before abolition. When Congress ignored their thousands of petitions, they tried to sue for wage theft but were told they could not. At the very least, the descendants of the tens of thousands of members of the Ex-Slave Pension and Bounty movement whose membership forms stated the number of years they had been working as slaves, along with the names of their slave owners and the plantations on which they lived should be eligible for reparations. Other individuals who can prove the identity of slave ancestors, whether they sought reparations in the 19th century or not, could also be eligible.
Reparations for unpaid labor are restitution, payment for damages to make whole for harm done. No restrictions should be made on how the money is spent. If their ancestors had received wages for their labor they too would have bought what they wanted, invested it as they desired, or given it to churches or schools or charities.
Beyond reparations to individuals, there should be a Reparations Superfund as historian V.P. Franklin suggests...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I would say what I think about Ms Berry and her demands for reparations, but it would probably get pulled.
Besides, Fred Reed said it better a few years back:
I see by the papers in the Yankee Capital that Johnny Cochran, and of course Jesse and Al, are wheezing and blowing like a county-fair calliope with a leaky boiler. They always are. This time it was about the need to pay reparations for the ravages trala of slavery. It got me to thinking.I hate it when that happens.
Now, I know I'm hard-hearted, and mean-spirited, and no damn good. It's probably my only virtue. But on consideration, I realized that they might be right. The ravages of slavery do run deep, and cause motingator trouble, with no end in sight. I decided that compensation was only reasonable. Sometimes you don't like a conclusion, but you have to reach it. All right. I'll be a man about it.
You can pay me reparations, Johnny.
(rest at the link)
The fact that there is even a debate about this says a lot about the current state of civil rights in this country.
Shocking fact: All the slaves and slaveowners are dead. All the children of slaves and slaveowners are dead too. And any surviving grandchildren are in their golden years. Should we pay reparations too to the Indians for ‘stealing’ their land and killing a ton of them? Heck, since it’s ‘stolen’ we might as well give it back.
It’s madness to think that somehow the great-grandchildren and great-great grandchildren of slaveowners should pay reparations to people who were not in the least bit connected to slavery. And if you want reparations for segregation, it’s already called enforced equality, AA and the Great Society with free welfare and education.
There’s only so much we can do, when a disproportionate chunk of black students refuse to learn. Doesn’t matter how much money you pump into the schools, since you can’t exactly lock them up and force them to learn. Zuckerberg’s wasted 400 million is living proof of that.
“You dont hear me bitching and we got St Pattys Day not entire history month.”
Why did we give them the shortest month of the year? (Heard a black comedian joking about that)
At this point many urban blacks can’t prove their ancestry back to 1960, never mind 1860. Any black person who mentions reparations is acknowledging that they have no hope for the future of the group in general, and is basically asking to be given the same status as American Indians (wards of the state in perpetuity).
Dems have acknowledged the problem and are racing to abort as many of these blacks as possible (when they can’t prevent their initial conception).
Exactly!
Why?
The first payment from the fund is to repay the American taxpayers for the TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS spent on affirmative action government programs since the Johnson’s GREAT SOCIETY disaster
Do you have a reference for this Irish history? It’s quite interesting. I’d like to read more. Thanks.
And I’m sure they’ll get one if it means o can bolster 2016 elections. Here comes the EO.
I’m completely in accord with paying reparations. The individuals who are profiting from the unpaid labor should pay it. Only for individuals who have been enslaved too.
In other words.....NO.
Think Michael Jordan.......
The debt is paid.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-irish-slave-trade-the-forgotten-white-slaves/31076
Here’s another one about Irish slavery:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-irish-slave-trade-the-forgotten-white-slaves/31076
“Shouldnt the blacks in Nigeria, Angola, etc. start the reparations,”
More interesting is that it appears jews controlled many of the slave ships. That ought to go over like a lead sinker.
Your assertion of Irish slavery is not true. Europeans came to British America both voluntarily and involuntarily as Indentured Servants, not as Chattel Slaves. There was an important legal difference. After 7 years (the usual term), the indenture expired and in most colonies, the now free person received a grant of land and farm tools. One of my own ancestors was an indentured servant in Martin’s Hundred on the James River. After the massacre of 1622, his master was dead and he wed the masters widow and was released from his indenture.
You can read more here:
Mary Frances Berry: We Need a Reparations Superfund
Gee, what do they call welfare, section 8 housing, free cell phones, food stamps, etc.? Ungrateful slobs!
yeh that was a good one
Have these people secured a judgment against those they feel aggrieved them? To suggest anything else would be to suggest that a party not attached in any way to a civil suit should be held liable for it. Imagine that precedent.
So she’s getting her reparation in spades already.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.