I take it that Hitlery’s book is work of fiction.....
Good answer, Trey Gowdy!!! The time will come...Trey....when you can utter to Ms. Clinton.......Just the facts, Ms. Clinton....simply just the facts!!! And...I would let her blabber all she wants. Methinks, her tome is going to be a flop just like Elizabeth Warren’s was.......yea...Clinton will get a million low lifes to buy it....but...it is going nowhere fast!!! It’s called a flash in the pan!!! Ms. Clinton is used, damaged goods...just like POTUS Barack Hussein Obama has become!!!
Keep the powder dry...Mr. Gowdy!!! Ur time is coming. Remember...our dead heroes of Benghazi are relying on you to produce the truth and truly prove....ya all have not left them behind....as Ms. Clinton, POTUS Obama, Leon Penatta, Susan Rice, etc. did, so coldly, without loyalty and unconcerned!!!
Hillary needs to be Freeped at every stop on her book tour.
She is trying to set a false narrative.
The optics of people protesting her would be disastrous for her.
Hey Hillary! If our enemy demands that you do something for them that is detrimental to The United States, and you do it, would that be providing aid and comfort to the enemy? Let’s see that commercial again that you and Obama made using American taxpayer dollars. Treason.
The question probably came from one of Cankles own staff(or the MSM, same thing), just trying to generate interest in her “already 1 million books sold” DOA fictionalized tome.
That was the best possible answer Trey Gowdy could have given. Had he made any specific statements about that chapter, they would have been used by the mainstream media to promote Hillary's book. Gowdy was too smart to take the bait.
The book tour is just another Clinton money laundering scheme. Huge upfront bonus, then her rich Marxists friends order them for use as cord wood.
Absolutely right!! For Trey Gowdy it's a sworn depostion and testifying before the select committee, Hillary is NOT looking forward to either.
You just know she’s waiting for Trey Gowdy to comment about her book of lies. I bet he could hang her out to dry with what she’s written, but he won’t. He’s a prosecutor through and through. He knows the pitfalls well and he won’t be suckered in.
Note the typical subtle bias?
They never say that any democrat or Hillary "waved off" questions on Benghazi, even though her statements are a perpetual wave off of the truth.
No, only Republican Congressmen chartered with finding out the truth of very questionable and extraordinary episode in America's foreign policy "wave off", that is, refuse to answer questions.
I like the way that Gowdy lectures the press every time they try to put him down.
Bump on the head donchano!
Does anyone notice that with the current President, as well as the Clintons, the debate, no matter how it is framed, is always about "me"--even if they use the words, "best for the country"?
Where is the eloquence of a Washington, an Adams, a Jefferson, or even of a Reagan?
The very nature of the "miracle at Philadelphia" was one of passionate defense of liberty for future generations, selflessness in the face of danger to the personal life and property of the participants, and of a greater interest in the lives and liberties of countrymen than in the careers of themselves.
Perhaps leaders in Washington today might consider Jefferson's description of how he and his contemporaries in the early days approached matters of interest for the new nation:
Thomas Jefferson:
"Sitting near me on some occasion of a trifling but wordy debate, he asked how I could sit in silence hearing so much false reasoning which a word should refute? I observed to him that to refute indeed was easy, but to silence impossible. That in measures brought forward by myself, I took the laboring oar, as was incumbent on me; but that in general I was willing to listen. If every sound argument or objection was used by some one or other of the numerous debaters, it was enough: if not, I thought it sufficient to suggest the omission, without going into a repetition of what had been already said by others. That this was a waste and abuse of the time and patience of the house which could not be justified. And I believe that if the members of deliberative bodies were to observe this course generally, they would do in a day what takes them a week, and it is really more questionable, than may at first be thought, whether Bonaparte's dumb legislature which said nothing and did much, may not be preferable to one which talks much and does nothing. I served with General Washington in the legislature of Virginia before the revolution, and, during it, with Dr. Franklin in Congress. I never heard either of them speak ten minutes at a time, nor to any but the main point which was to decide the question. They laid their shoulders to the great points, knowing that the little ones would follow of themselves. If the present Congress errs in too much talking, how can it be otherwise in a body to which the people send 150. lawyers, whose trade it is to question everything, yield nothing, & talk by the hour? That 150. lawyers should do business together ought not to be expected."
The more that I think about it, the more previously scripted Clinton’s “supposed vehement response” was!
1. She said: What difference, at this point, does it make.
2. She could have said: What difference does it make, at
this point!
3. Or she could have said, At this point, what difference
does it make!
The normal response would be either phrase #2, or #3.
But I believe that her coaches, or her own creepiness, came
up with the convoluted: what difference -AT THIS POINT -
does it make?
I believe that she realized that her bogus testimony could
have been clipped by the media to record:
“What difference does it make ........”
or: “..........., what difference does it make”
But in her own hag way, she knew that if she vehemently
reacted, with her arms flailing, the editors could not
edit out the “at this point” modifying central phrase.
She continues to be a manipulative POS, the same as she has
been for the past 45 years!
NOTE: In advertising circles, one response is counted as 100----b/c at least 99 agreed but didn't bother to respond.
After they revived her, Hillary addressed a women's leadership conference, asserting that she had "taken responsibility" for security at the diplomatic outpost, where Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans died, and had "pledged" to do everything she could to ensure a similar tragedy won’t happen again.
=====================================================
MILITARY.COM reported (during the post-Morsi ousting in Egypt), that US Pentagon officials declined to give specifics on conversations between DOD's Chuck Hagel and brilliant tactician Egyptian Gen al-Sisi, who replaced Morsi.
(NOTE Gen al Sisi, 58, received a masters degree from the U.S. War College in Carlisle, Pa, in 2006. The General is revered by Egyptians for routing the Muslim Brotherhood which Egyptians consider a terrorist organization.)
Although officials would not discuss the specifics of the military-to-military talks, the US would need Gen al-Sisi's approval to move through Egyptian air space if Washington decided to send Marines to aid in the evacuation of U.S. personnel.
READY TO ROLL About 550 Marines and their tilt-rotor MV-22 Osprey aircraft are at bases in Spain and Italy on standby if they are needed. A Navy Amphibious Ready Group with 4,000 Marines and sailors aboard, led by the helicopter assault ship Kearsarge, was also in the region following completion of the Eager Lion training exercises in Jordan.
© Copyright 2013 Military.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
=====================================
AIN'T KARMA A *ITCH, HILLARY? the US helicopter assault ship Kearsarge, WAS in the region, ready to airlift Benghazi personnel to safety. Americans were lied to----we were told Kearsarge was not available to help endangered Americans in Benghazi.
=====================================
FIVE SECOND BENGHAZI QUIZ
(Q.) Who holds the key to unlocking the Benghazi secrets Obama and Hillary will not divulge?
(A.) That would be Egyptian Gen Al-Sisi who drove blood-thirsty Muslims out of Egyptian politics and has vowed to rebuild the 63 churches torched by the Muslim Brotherhood.
Right now, sitting in an Egyptian jail is a man al-Sisi arrested for inciting terrorism.
That man is Gehad al Hadad....once employed by the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation AT THE SAME TIME he was an active member of the Muslim Brotherhood, planning jihad.
Gehad is also conversant WRT how the M/B launders money to finance terrorism, using "tax-free foundations."
Want on or off this ping list of 50+ (and growing) FReepers? Just drop me a FReep mail.
So far, so good. He is not allowing her to goad him into saying something which will come back to bite him on the sass.
Self Swerving evidence does not impress the Gowd. Heads will roll.