FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
The bigoted Wise Latina herself a product of reverse discrimination
No wonder she defends it with such political rather than judicial slant. She’s been spoonfed all her life and WOULDNT EVEN BE IN THE JUDICIARY OTHERWISE
Its important to note the pure idiocy of the appeals court ruling that overturned the ban in the first place. “The appeals court says the ban puts an extraordinary burden on those who have to mount a long expensive campaign if they want to protect it”. Basically they said that BAMN is too poor to lose.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2959958/posts
Soto would prefer to use the original Constitution to wipe her arse with, while re-writing it to suit her political needs.
Because the decision was 6-2 maybe her influence will be weakened by her outburst. The wise Latina may have chosen poorly.
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
So basically, Scalia gave Sotominor a majority STFU.
Without quotas, she certainly wouldn’t have her current lifetime gig.
Shocker - An affirmative action Justice, appointed by an affirmative action President, supports affirmative action.
bump!
bfl
Two men enter. One man leaves.
She’s everything we thought she would be.
Scalia: Wake me up as soon as she’s finished reading her dissent or if I start snoring.
Scalia must feel bad having a fight with an intellectual ‘tard.
**The scuffle erupted over Sotomayor’s not so thinly veiled inference that the hateful majority of voters in Michigan must be a bunch of blazing cat fur racists. Going one step further, she even invoked Jim Crow laws in her comments. **
No too smart, are you lady?
**“As Justice Harlan observed over a century ago, ‘[o]ur Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens,’” Scalia concluded, quoting the dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson. “The people of Michigan wish the same for their governing charter. It would be shameful for us to stand in their way.”
And then, the Parthian shot: “And doubly shameful to equate ‘the majority’ behind [the constitutional amendment] with ‘the majority’ responsible for Jim Crow,” he added in a final footnote, citing the first two pages of Sotomayor’s dissent.**
Way to go, Scalia!
Sotomayor wouldn’t be on the Court but for Affirmative Action.
Affirmative Action, which liberals LOVE, is a racist policy that rests on the implicit premise that if you’re a minority,you’re not good enough to do it yourself. (No wonder liberals support it fervently.)
It’s what former President Bush called “the soft bigotry of low expectations.”
Leftists want anything but judging a person on the content of their character. Divide, dissent, lie, cheat and steal. That’s all they do.
Also read Justice Kennedy’s opinion. He points out that the logic used by the Wise Latina and other attackers of Michigan’s defense of racial equality is based on all the belief all Blacks think alike, all Hispanics think alike, all Asians think alike, and so on. So Sonya, tell me, who are the real racists in this case?