Posted on 04/19/2014 8:19:35 AM PDT by cutty
We were much better off in 1775. Just say’n.
Asset Forfeiture.
The legacy of the War on Drugs that just keeps giving.
And the government can take your property without charging you with a crime. We really aren’t a free people, we are just told that we are.
My broadest take: It appears that the attorney was not acting as an attorney but as an accountant...”helping” his client to “deceive”.
Bookmark
It doesn't matter what you're accused of-- theft. treason. triple homicide, pedophilia. With very limited exceptions, an attorney cannot be compelled to testify against a client, nor can their communications be subpoenaed for evidence, UNLESS IT'S ABOUT TAXES !!!
Dawn breaks evenly today
On the truth and the lie
All rise, courts in session
Were hanging someone high
Justice means nothing today...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kY8psvAB7wY
THE SYSTEM HAS FAILED
We really should take the next step:
The new model for American Jurisprudence:
1) Sentence the perp.
2) Hold a trial that shows the sentence is justified.
I would not call it a slippery slope, but, WWWWEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...
This ruling only applies to people who elect to be treated as corporations, and thereby trade their rights for privileges.
The fact that such a swap even exists should fascinate every American, since it is the process by which rights are lost. Yet it might as well be astrology for how it’s generally treated.
I find that amazing.
Hangings on Tuesday. Trials on Wednesday.
Link to the decision:
http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/ADInvestmentDiv.Halpern.TC.WPD.pdf
Attorney Client privilege has never been absolute. There are a variety of reason why it may not be valid. As I read it, the client has implicitly waived Attorney Client privilege because they have argued their attorney gave them X advice, and thus the other side gets to see if the attorney actually did give that advice.
It is easier to beg forgiveness afterwards, than to seek permission beforehand.
The “Free Country” ended on November 4, 2008. By popular demand.
Happened long before that.
—
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government, lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.”
Patrick Henry
1736-1799
This is a blog...and he’s an agitator...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.