Skip to comments.
Is THIS Nessie? Apple maps satellite image spots 'creature swimming' below surface of Loch Ness
The Mirror ^
| Apr 18, 2014 13:23
| David Colins
Posted on 04/18/2014 7:09:25 PM PDT by 11th_VA
The photographs were captured by two different amateur Nessie hunters scanning different satellites on their iPhone and iPads.
TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 350; crustacean; cryptobiology; cryptozoology; godsgravesglyphs; lochness; nessie; paleolithic; treefiddy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: 11th_VA
It’s wake...somebody photoshopped the boat out.
To: Joe 6-pack
Good thought, but that whale shark would have to be a hundred (hundreds?) of feet long. Compare it to the size of the trees!
42
posted on
04/18/2014 7:37:04 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: UCANSEE2
ah the famous flippercraft....
43
posted on
04/18/2014 7:37:45 PM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
To: This Just In
44
posted on
04/18/2014 7:37:58 PM PDT
by
Bratch
To: fabian
Stop saying that. If he sees this thread he’ll be upset. Catfish are notoriously sensitive about their weight.
To: MeshugeMikey
I totally agree. It looks like some sort of boat’s wake, with the boat having been digitally cancelled. Maybe Apple was using some sort of technology to reconcile multiple frames of the same location? Nessie was supposed to be a serpent, not a giant catfish.
46
posted on
04/18/2014 7:39:45 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: dangus
Oh I know, lol. Actually if the pic is legit, I’m guessing it’s probably a sand bar, but if you look intently at the close up pic, it is the same general shape of a whale shark and even appears to have a similar mottled pattern of dots.
47
posted on
04/18/2014 7:40:26 PM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: 11th_VA
We're gonna need a bigger boat.
48
posted on
04/18/2014 7:43:42 PM PDT
by
Flag_This
(Liberalism: Kills countries dead.)
To: Joe 6-pack
The pic is legit; it’s been shown to be the wake of a boat.
49
posted on
04/18/2014 7:47:02 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: 11th_VA
I don’t know what it is but I’m willing to bet on higher revenue for the local tourist facilities and restaurants.
50
posted on
04/18/2014 7:47:24 PM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: Bratch
I'll see that and raise you:
;-)
51
posted on
04/18/2014 7:49:24 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Uninstall Fascist Firefox. Get Pale Moon.)
To: 11th_VA
Nah, it is just Moochie picking up some more lobsters:
52
posted on
04/18/2014 7:53:49 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
(When progressives ignore moral parameters, they also lose the natural gift of common sense.)
To: 11th_VA
It's not likely to be an aquatic animal. The wake is too large - and that means that the animal would have to be poorly attuned to swimming in water. Short of moving at full speed, there should be no traces on the surface. Those surface waves represent waste energy, and aquatic life long ago learned to minimize those losses. Only human crafts generate wake, and that is only because we value speed more than efficiency. Animals usually have no appointments to hurry to; their top speed is reserved for hunting - or for escaping someone else's hunt.
53
posted on
04/18/2014 7:54:34 PM PDT
by
Greysard
To: UCANSEE2
Oh thanks...I just did it from memory instead of looking it up... :-)
54
posted on
04/18/2014 7:57:50 PM PDT
by
Aria
( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coup d'etats.)
To: RandallFlagg
MIGHTY JACK
55
posted on
04/18/2014 8:08:54 PM PDT
by
struggle
To: struggle; TomServo; CrowTRobot
OMG!!
I have the MST3K DVD of that one!
Pinging the crew.
56
posted on
04/18/2014 8:12:16 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Uninstall Fascist Firefox. Get Pale Moon.)
To: wally_bert
LOL! Best explanation yet.
57
posted on
04/18/2014 8:14:13 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(Love me, love my guns!©)
To: cripplecreek
I’m glad that some of the classic Dr. Who gets integrated into the new one.
58
posted on
04/18/2014 8:14:20 PM PDT
by
wally_bert
(There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.)
To: RandallFlagg; stainlessbanner
59
posted on
04/18/2014 8:15:16 PM PDT
by
TomServo
To: doc1019
I’m glad at least one other person did. I’ve bought a few classics on DVD and they have been great cheesy fun.
60
posted on
04/18/2014 8:15:27 PM PDT
by
wally_bert
(There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson