This is what we have ALLOWED our nation to become. It's an all out IN YOUR FACE assault.
Pathetic.
1 posted on
12/24/2013 7:28:36 AM PST by
unixfox
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: unixfox
Has a hetero couple ever gotten married atop a float in the Rose Parade? If it ever did happen, did the media make such a huge deal out of it, leading up to the day?
I tell you what. This story is reaching millions of dedicated Rose Parade watchers, and millions of them are probably disgusted that the organizers chose to use the immense drawing power of this annual event to promote such degeneracy.
This is going to negatively impact viewing numbers this year. I know that for the first time in eighteen years, it won’t be showing in my house.
67 posted on
12/24/2013 8:48:11 AM PST by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: unixfox
And divorce in a few months.
Pfffht.
69 posted on
12/24/2013 8:53:23 AM PST by
SaxxonWoods
(....Let It Burn...)
To: unixfox
What? They couldn't find a nice Army chapel to get married in?
![](http://i42.tinypic.com/2empr2g.jpg)
75 posted on
12/24/2013 9:01:59 AM PST by
Perseverando
(Obamanation/Obamastan: It's ALL about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
To: unixfox
80 posted on
12/24/2013 9:13:49 AM PST by
mlizzy
("If people spent an hour a week in Eucharistic Adoration, abortion would be ended." --Mother Teresa)
To: unixfox
As much as I like seeing the (presumably) wholesome high school kids in bands and other activities, I will not be watching that parade this year.
83 posted on
12/24/2013 9:31:31 AM PST by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: unixfox
What's next: "I Saw Daddy Kissing Santa Claus?"
Yet another revolting example of the politicization of the personal, by means of promoting perversity. Can't wait the see the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce float...
85 posted on
12/24/2013 9:47:30 AM PST by
andy58-in-nh
(Cogito, ergo armatum sum.)
To: unixfox
L.A. gay homosexual couple to marry on Rose Parade floatHOMOSEXUAL, because there's nothing GAY about it.
87 posted on
12/24/2013 9:55:13 AM PST by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: unixfox
Fags marrying on an AIDS float.
How apropos.
89 posted on
12/24/2013 9:58:05 AM PST by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: unixfox
I have visions of a firetruck slipping into the peerade behjind the “floaters” and hosing them down at the appropriate moment-—dampen their enthusiasm so to speak.
91 posted on
12/24/2013 10:09:56 AM PST by
cherokee1
(skip the names---just kick the buttz)
To: unixfox
Yeah, well just another reason to NOT bother watching it, though, I must admit, I haven’t seen it in years, so it won’t be any hardship for me to ignore it.
93 posted on
12/24/2013 10:22:56 AM PST by
SuziQ
To: unixfox
I wonder if the Robertsons had applied to have a float with Phil shooting paper mache squirrels, would they have been approved. It’s perfectly legal, and has the same effect on people that this gay ‘marriage’ will have on me.
95 posted on
12/24/2013 10:43:26 AM PST by
Chaguito
To: unixfox
![](http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploads22/171+0517050334+animal+house+eat+me+float+carnage1366431679.jpg)
Is this the float?
To: unixfox
Agree. It’s pathetic. These sick people have a craven need for everyone to applaud and approve them. I had more sympathy when they were in the closet. I don’t need to beat them up, but they don’t need to stick it in our faces either. They can’t leave ANY aspect of normal American life the hell alone from their garbage.
101 posted on
12/24/2013 11:34:27 AM PST by
gemoftheocean
(...geez, this all seems so straight forward and logical to me...)
To: unixfox
That settles it, I’m not watching.
102 posted on
12/24/2013 11:38:00 AM PST by
Gamecock
(Celebrating 20,000 posts of dubious quality.)
To: unixfox
Thanks for the warning. I will now not watch the Parade show. Not interested in watching perverts in a parade..........
104 posted on
12/24/2013 11:39:29 AM PST by
SECURE AMERICA
(Where can I go to sign up for the American Revolution 2013 and the Crusades 2013?)
To: unixfox
sponsored by the AIDS healthcare foundation.
Guess they don’t see the irony in that though I won’t be watching that pile of crap nor two faces pushing lovers have a sham marriage
105 posted on
12/24/2013 11:41:49 AM PST by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: unixfox
Absolutely disgusting!! If the queers don't like my opinion...fire me!!!
110 posted on
12/24/2013 11:59:08 AM PST by
4yearlurker
(Some people say that experts agree!!)
To: unixfox
For truth in advertising, they should rename it the "Toilet Bowl Parade".
We won't be watching.
We won't be watching the "news" that day either, where this perversity will be wildly celebrated as the lede by every "legitimate" "news" organization.
The World may be laughing at us, but the Devil will be cheering us on.
112 posted on
12/24/2013 12:38:32 PM PST by
Gritty
(Liberals think living your life free of welfare, EBT, and government nannies is "cheating"-J Hawkins)
To: unixfox
Good afternoon.
L.A. gay couple to marry on Rose Parade float
Why?
Is the parade going to marry a couple of heterosexuals on a float in the same parade?
I'm sure someone has an answer...
5.56mm
113 posted on
12/24/2013 12:42:08 PM PST by
M Kehoe
To: unixfox
Gay marriage is red herring to hide the man-boy/woman-girl recruiting activities; an attempt to “normalize” perversity
114 posted on
12/24/2013 1:01:01 PM PST by
WriteOn
(Truth)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson