Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High court ends Liberty University lawsuit over health law
Fox News Online ^ | 12/2 | AP

Posted on 12/02/2013 9:12:49 AM PST by TheBigB

Edited on 12/02/2013 9:14:42 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a challenge to ObamaCare brought by a Virginia-based Christian university, ending for now one of the biggest remaining legal fights against the health care law.

The justices, in turning away the lawsuit from Liberty University and leaving in place a federal appeals court ruling dismissing it, did not comment on their decision. The decision comes less than a week after the high court agreed to hear a challenge from Hobby Lobby and one other company to the law's so-called contraception mandate -- the requirement on most employers to provide access to contraceptive coverage.

snip


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 0carenightmare; bhoscotus; christianschools; contraceptionmandate; hobbylobby; lawsuit; libertyu; libertyuniversity; obamacare; religiousfreedom; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2013 9:12:49 AM PST by TheBigB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

uh oh ...


2 posted on 12/02/2013 9:15:54 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
I'm not surprised that would tyrants are trying to take over this nation from the inside.

What stuns me is how no one ANYWHERE at ANY LEVEL is trying to stop them.
3 posted on 12/02/2013 9:16:05 AM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

A. Kennedy must have struck again.


4 posted on 12/02/2013 9:16:33 AM PST by Theodore R. (The grand pooh-bahs are flirting with Christie, but it's Jebbie's turn!" to LOSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Maybe the American people truly believe in tyranny. Just so long as they have their football, pizza, and beer


5 posted on 12/02/2013 9:17:23 AM PST by Theodore R. (The grand pooh-bahs are flirting with Christie, but it's Jebbie's turn!" to LOSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
From the article: "The university had mounted a major challenge to the law, going after the contraception mandate but also the requirement on employers to provide coverage."

Guess SCOTUS sees the challenge on contraception to be a duplicate of the Hobby Lobby case, but the forced employer coverage provision is now 'legal', it would seem.

6 posted on 12/02/2013 9:18:05 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a challenge to ObamaCare brought by a Virginia-based Christian university, ending for now one of the biggest remaining legal fights against the health care law.

Ping for later

7 posted on 12/02/2013 9:18:22 AM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Can I assume Roberts was the deciding justice on this?


8 posted on 12/02/2013 9:19:13 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

The Supreme Court is playing with fire on this one. They well could cause a quiet revolution with the wrong decision here. What if people decide that they are simply not going to provide free birth control and abortion pills? What can the government do if a massive resistance arises?


9 posted on 12/02/2013 9:20:21 AM PST by maxwellsmart_agent (F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Why not Roberts again?


10 posted on 12/02/2013 9:20:33 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent

There should be mass resistance to this crap


11 posted on 12/02/2013 9:21:34 AM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Empty Belly... full Mind

Full Belly... Empty Mind....

It is the cycle of History...


12 posted on 12/02/2013 9:22:25 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

The Roberts’ case earlier was about individuals being forced to buy insurance,
so why would the employer requirement not be ruled in the same way as that abortion of a ruling?


13 posted on 12/02/2013 9:22:50 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

This means they could not even get 4 Justices to agree to hear the case; assume they got three; 6 either said no or abstained. Not good...not good at all.


14 posted on 12/02/2013 9:24:13 AM PST by dan on the right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan

The sodomites have taken over the country. Slipped in the back door when we weren't looking.

15 posted on 12/02/2013 9:24:26 AM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent
What can the government do if a massive resistance arises?

Like your thinking and would support massive resistance while this government levies fines, sends out their IRS agents to harass and shutters businesses. For this would be the rulers response (imho). The divide has been crossed and nobody (including myself) relishes where our nation is headed.

16 posted on 12/02/2013 9:26:11 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: MrB
Ignoring for just a minute the illogic of the Supreme Court, there's actually a bunch of reasons why employers shouldn't have to be forced into offering coverage (which I'm sure we're aware of, but there's still cause to repeat this):

1. Companies aren't the beneficiary of the purchase. They are effectively forced to buy something they don't use. What's more, they don't have much discretion on the converage options to purchase, which will raise rates way high in this one-size-fits-all new world order.
2. Even if you somehow create a linguistic monster to call THIS a tax, it truly isn't since it doesn't apply to every companies. It doesn't even apply to most companies.
3. This creates a forced employee benefit. It used to be simply a perk of some jobs. Now it's a mandate.
4. I don't recall this power being called out in the Constitution (oh snap - we threw that out years ago).

18 posted on 12/02/2013 9:42:28 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Garbage. Garbage justice.

Freedom of religion? The federal government doesn’t give a damn.


19 posted on 12/02/2013 9:52:11 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

And welfare, foodstamps, Medicaid, government housing, etc.


20 posted on 12/02/2013 9:52:25 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (From time to time the.tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson