Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB
Ignoring for just a minute the illogic of the Supreme Court, there's actually a bunch of reasons why employers shouldn't have to be forced into offering coverage (which I'm sure we're aware of, but there's still cause to repeat this):

1. Companies aren't the beneficiary of the purchase. They are effectively forced to buy something they don't use. What's more, they don't have much discretion on the converage options to purchase, which will raise rates way high in this one-size-fits-all new world order.
2. Even if you somehow create a linguistic monster to call THIS a tax, it truly isn't since it doesn't apply to every companies. It doesn't even apply to most companies.
3. This creates a forced employee benefit. It used to be simply a perk of some jobs. Now it's a mandate.
4. I don't recall this power being called out in the Constitution (oh snap - we threw that out years ago).

18 posted on 12/02/2013 9:42:28 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: alancarp

In the Wonderland of our USSC, I am surmising that it needs to show up there as an explicit tax case.


153 posted on 12/06/2013 6:36:41 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

Are the employers actually mandated to BUY their employees coverage, or just offer it. In other words, is there a requirement for employers to pay all or part of their employees health insurance premiums, or just offer their workers a group plan into which they can buy?


164 posted on 12/10/2013 10:17:53 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson