Posted on 11/08/2013 2:47:18 PM PST by NYer
WASHINGTON, D.C., November 7, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – This afternoon the Senate approved a bill that could force business owners who adhere to traditional values to hire homosexuals, bisexuals, and those who do not dress in accordance with their biological sex or face litigation.
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) passed following a bipartisan 64-32 vote.
Supporters say it would forbid “workplace discrimination” against homosexuals and transgender employees and job-seekers. But critics say, like the HHS mandate, its religious exemption is unduly narrow and would force employers – including Christian schools and nurseries – to violate their consciences.
Its protections for “transgender” workers would allow a biological male who self-identifies as a female to use the company's women's restroom or locker room. It would also allow employees to sue if they believed they had faced “discrimination” on the job, experienced a hostile work environment, or had not received a job because of their sexual preference or cross-dressing habits.
All Senate Democrats voted for its approval except Pennsylvania's Bob Casey, who did not vote.
Ten of the chamber's 45 Republicans also voted yes, including John McCain, Rob Portman, Pat Toomey, and Lisa Murkowski.
Only one senator spoke against ENDA on the Senate floor, Dan Coats of Indiana.
President Obama hailed the bill's speedy passage. “Today’s victory is a tribute to all those who fought for this progress ever since a similar bill was introduced after the Stonewall riots more than three decades ago,” he said, adding that the bill is backed by a number of “corporations” and “faith communities.”
While the bill exempts churches and houses of worship and some affiliated institutions, it does not include many overtly religious nonprofits or business owners. The New York Times called these protections “unduly broad.” But the Becket Fund called the bill's religious exemption “manifestly inadequate."
This morning the Senate adopted, by voice vote, an amendment offered by Republicans Rob Portman and Kelly Ayotte that religious institutions protected by the act would not lose federal funding or other government partnerships if they opposed homosexuality. The Family Research Council's David Christensen, said the amendment did nothing to change the fact that ENDA “removes the ability of non-profits, para-church ministries, and individual business owners to make their own decisions about appropriate conduct in the workplace.”
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid candidly told the homosexual newspaper The Washington Blade that he believed the amendment was merely “an effort by them to have a reason for joining the bill.”
Senators rejected an amendment from Pennsylvania Republican Pat Toomey to apply the bill to businesses “in whole or in substantial part owned, controlled, or managed by a particular religion or by a particular religious corporation, association, or society.” Toomey also supported the final bill.
The bill's broad reach threatens faithful business owners, its critics say. The Catholic bishops conference (USCCB) warned ENDA could “punish” those who hold traditional religious views, including Catholics and evangelicals.
“ENDA would lead to a form of reverse discrimination,” Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said this afternoon. “Anyone who expresses or promotes a view of family or morality that can be interpreted to be a disapproval of homosexual or transgender conduct will be subject to retaliation and discrimination.”
The group referred lawmakers to numerous lawsuits and complaints of alleged “homophobia,” some costing hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The potential to harm business owners convinced House Speaker John Boehner to come out against the bill, saying it will not enjoy a vote in the lower chamber. President Obama has hinted he may sign an executive order including the bill's provisions if it is not adopted into law.
In this afternoon's vote our senators, including one Democrat, did not vote today.
Republicans who voted yes include Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, Susan Collins of Maine, Jeff Flake of Arizona, Orrin Hatch of Utah, Dean Heller of Nevada, Mark Kirk of Illinois, John McCain of Arizona, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Rob Portman of Ohio, and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania.
You may view vote results here.
Hell I want him to pay restitution for the four planes that he trashed.
“In 5 years, Ted Cruz will be making abortion mandatory.”
THAT was absolutely uncalled for!! Don’t even try to defend it… just STFU
I’m going to present myself as a queer at an Islamic business just so I can sue them for not hiring me.
Doesn’i it have to still pass the House? I wish someone up there would have the savvy to ask what effect it will have on muslim businesses and if they will be forced to hire sodomites.
Yeah, this is an “in your face” punking effort by the liberals.
Executive orders do not have the breadth of law; they only affect agencies directly under the auspice of the executive branch. They can also be rescinded by the next Chief Executive without any congressional action.
.
I’ve already called Heller’s (NV) office. He can kiss off on his next term! He’s lost four voters in this household.
B/S!
You think voting for ENDA is conservative? Do you even know what this bill is about? I can’t believe you would defend it.
You can go somewhere else to run down Cruz.
I’m not defending it.
Do you remember how Free Republic supported Toomey? For Years. And look what he does. I won’t trust another Republican Senator. Why do we always have to be stabbed in the back. They all sell out to the left.
You can knock off the gratuitous attacks Cruz. Also, your attacks on other FReepers. It’s not appreciated.
Can you tell me how much Free Republic supported Toomey over the years?
Never happen.
The scumbags who approved this are the usual suspects.
Who approved it? Pat Toomey was the great hope of conservatives.
So far Ted Cruz has the right credentials....(& I don't mean his choice of colleges)...
..he has left a conservative paper trail through the years that shines all by itself.
We have to trust someone.....we have to...or all is lost!
That being said, I only put my trust in God....but I honestly believe God has maneuvered Ted Cruz for this time in our lives.
And if God is for him....we need to help him, not condemn him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.