Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kelly Ayotte’s Lynch Mob - Base vs. Establishment battle erupts in Senate GOP.
American Spectator ^ | 10.8.13 | Jeffrey Lord

Posted on 10/08/2013 2:26:28 PM PDT by neverdem

Kelly Ayotte was furious.

One media account after another (as here) has the Republican and theoretically conservative New Hampshire senator angrily attacking Senator Ted Cruz in a recent closed-door Senate GOP Caucus. Behaving as follows, this much cited and notably un-refuted coming from the New York Times, bold print supplied here for emphasis:

And on Wednesday at a private luncheon, several Senate Republicans — Dan Coats of Indiana, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Kelly Ayotte of...

--snip--

NR was spot on here about Ayotte, and there’s one more thing to add about that Ayotte comment of seeking a “thoughtful, bipartisan solution to a tough problem.” We have cited it here before and, since Ayotte herself used the word, we will again cite William F. Buckley Jr.’s alarm at the very word “bipartisan” with the bold print emphasis.

The most alarming single danger to the American political system lies in the fact that an identifiable team of Fabian operators is bent on controlling both our major political parties(under the sanction of such fatuous and unreasoned slogans as “national unity,” “middle-of-the-road,” “progressivism,” and “bipartisanship.”) Clever intriguers are reshaping both parties in the image of Babbitt, gone Social-Democrat. When and where this political issue arises, we are, without reservations, on the side of the traditional two-party system that fights its feuds in public and honestly; and we shall advocate the restoration of the two-party system at all costs.

So the red flag was already raised about Ayotte, both by Palin and NR, in that case for abandonment of well-stated conservative principle on immigration in the name of “bipartisanship” — a word specifically cited by Buckley as “the most alarming single danger to the American political system.” With no less than Governor Palin herself accusing Ayotte of having gone back on principle...

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana; US: New Hampshire; US: Texas; US: Utah; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: dancoats; kellyayotte; ronjohnson; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: ilgipper

“Ayotte is going to be a one-termer just like Scotty Brown. What a severe disappointment to see first termers elected by the grassroots sell out so damn quickly.”

Yeah, replace her with a democrat. Brilliant.


21 posted on 10/08/2013 3:48:53 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dforest
She's from New Hamster

Most of New England is just like old England.

22 posted on 10/08/2013 3:50:24 PM PDT by Rome2000 (THE WASHINGTONIANS AND UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE ARE THE ENEMY -ROTATE THE CAPITAL AMONGST THE STATES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Thanks. You must have been persona non-grata on the board, but I bet the taxpayers among your constituents appreciated you.


23 posted on 10/08/2013 3:51:46 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Obamacare forces slaves to buy their chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

If we don’t hold their feet to the fire on Tea Party principles, we’ll have an entire government of RINOs. Making them pay for abandoning us is the only way to ensure the amount of Tea Party folk in Congress continues to rise.


24 posted on 10/08/2013 3:53:56 PM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

I’m sorry F R I voted for this @$%#^^&^.


25 posted on 10/08/2013 3:54:28 PM PDT by sopwith (LIVE FREE OR DIE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Ms. Ayotte was especially furious, according to two people present, and waved a printout from a conservative group friendly to Mr. Cruz attacking 25 of his fellow Republican senators for supporting a procedural vote that the group counted as support of the health law.

This means that they are angry that the People were not fooled by their YES vote on Cloture followed by their NO vote on the House bill, when they later claimed that the voted to SUPPORT the House bill.

All Cruz did was remind people that the opportunity to stop Obamacare funding was to vote NO on Cloture when 60 yea votes were needed, but this group thought that they could be too clever by half and fool the people with the NO vote on the bill itself when only 51 yeas were needed to pass.

-PJ

26 posted on 10/08/2013 3:58:57 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Exactly. G-d bless Ted Cruz for standing for the TRUTH.


27 posted on 10/08/2013 4:02:05 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
I’m sorry F R I voted for this @$%#^^&^.

Don't feel bad...she fooled Governor Palin, as well.

28 posted on 10/08/2013 4:07:05 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Mike Lee and Ted Cruz could destroy those people if they leak what was said to them. I doubt they would do that, just for the sake of the party, but the Senate Republicans are complete fools if they think they can win a war against those guys. Of course they mostly are fools, so...


29 posted on 10/08/2013 4:08:34 PM PDT by Blackyce (French President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war alwaysmeans failure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Excellent, excellent article. Thanks for the post.


30 posted on 10/08/2013 4:11:41 PM PDT by BfloGuy (Workers and consumers are, of course, identical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

“If we don’t hold their feet to the fire on Tea Party principles, we’ll have an entire government of RINOs. Making them pay for abandoning us is the only way to ensure the amount of Tea Party folk in Congress continues to rise.”

I see. So you don’t think NH should even bother to have a Republican, unless it is a full fledged TP type.

NH is not likely to elect such an individual.


31 posted on 10/08/2013 4:12:35 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

Full-fledged? There can be a difference of opinion here or there. I think Pat Toomey has veered a little of course on some issues but not enough for me to feel abandoned. But on the issue of voting with Ted Cruz on the CR, Toomey got it right. Fighting Barrycare is something every Republican should agree on at a bare minimum. And simply saying you hold the position doesn’t count if you’re too cowardly to fight for it even when the outcome is far from guaranteed.


32 posted on 10/08/2013 5:17:32 PM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
I felt I had a responsibility to spend as carefully as I would have if the money were my own. While everyone else seemed to have a ... it's not my money, why not blow it on __________ attitude. From their point of view, they seemed to feel they had an obligation to spend the money on whatever crackpot idea someone had this month. Never thinking that with a little planning and patient we could have saved up for something REALLY amazing the whole community could be proud of. They seemed to have no ability to defer gratification long enough to save for anything of true value.
33 posted on 10/08/2013 6:31:10 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dforest

So she was the second one Glenn Beck was talking about today? The first being Midge McConnell.

She revealed her RINO tendencies a while ago, but I had no idea she was rabid.


34 posted on 10/08/2013 6:51:19 PM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

NH hasn’t had anybody good since Norris Cotton and Meldrim Thomson.


35 posted on 10/08/2013 8:15:18 PM PDT by Theodore R. (The grand pooh-bahs have spoken: "It's Jebbie's turn!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Clintonfatigued; Diana in Wisconsin; ...

Brown was clearly a moderate from the beginning, anyone who thought otherwise was fooling themselves, and he lost only because of Obama coattails.

Ayotte though was a mystery (ala another famous New Hampshireite, David Souter), pre-election everyone had a different opinion, everything from “very conservative” to “Susan Collins”. I’d say she ranks about a “Judd Gregg” at this point. Not great but better than someone like Brown (or certainly Collins, the worst, most liberal Republican in Congress). She’s more like Coats or McConnell, not liberal but establishment. Coats is an establishment old bull, it’s shame he was nominated in 2010 because the conservative vote was divided. He must keep quiet cause I never hear him criticized.

I’m not a fan of many Palin endorsments but she was not wrong to back Ayotte in 2010. Her main primary opponent, Ovide Lamontagne, is a loser who probably would have lost to the rat Hodes. He was nominated for Governor in 2012 and badly lost a race a he should have won. Given that Ayotte was not clearly any kind of RINO (those who said she was at the time offered no proof) she was the easy pick over the loser Lamontagne. He may be a swell guy but as evidenced by his 2 blowout defeats for Governor in 1996 and 2012, he ain’t ever gonna win high office.

I’m not happy to hear of Ron Johnson of WI being in on this with Ayotte and Coats.


36 posted on 10/09/2013 12:03:00 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Ayotte (spit) only beat Lamontagne by 1000 votes, even though she had SIX opponents; inclusive of Lamontagne. If Red Hampshire had a run-off system like Texas, Lamontagne probably would have won. Lamontagne is a perennial loser, but Hodes is a piece of crap, as well. Would Lamontagne have defeated Hodes? We'll never know.

Better to just write off Red England...the people are essentially Democrats.

37 posted on 10/09/2013 2:34:19 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?
Ayotte only received 38% of the GOP vote in the primary...a run-off would have been very interesting. In any event; she's a one-termer.

Is Red Hampshire the ONLY state with two female reps in the House, two in the Senate, and one on the Governor's mansion?

38 posted on 10/09/2013 2:41:11 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
NH in not likely to elect such an individual (ie: a true conservative)

NH DID think they elected a true conservative. Ayotte bare-*assed LIED in her campaign, embraced the support of Sara Palin, and the voters had high hopes for her. Not only is she a saboteur, she's dumb as a pile of rocks. Didn't she learn from the reaction Rubio got when he sold us out (with good intentions I believe) on immigration? Hasn't she noticed that Scott Brown in MA won as a conservative and lost because he was really a "compromiser"? Everyone on the thread is saying her primary competitor would've been just fine.

She's worse than having a democrat. She's a saboteur from within, a minimccain. She might be a kindergarterner in the playground of intellect, but that doesn't excuse her. She decided to be in the US Senate, she should get no better treatment than the other RINO liars. Dumb is not an excuse; she was smart enough to lie about her loyalties and intentions.

39 posted on 10/09/2013 2:48:29 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: grania

Bravo! You nailed it.


40 posted on 10/09/2013 2:53:14 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson