Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House: We’ll take a short-term deal on the debt ceiling
Hot Air ^ | October 7,2013 | ED MORRISSEY

Posted on 10/07/2013 8:30:11 AM PDT by Hojczyk

Did the White House just blink on the debt-ceiling fight? After weeks of insisting it won’t negotiate on either the budget or the debt ceiling, a top White House adviser said this morning that Barack Obama would sign a short-term lift in the latter to gain more time for a longer-term agreement:

President Obama would accept a short-term increase in the federal borrowing cap , rather than one lasting a year or more, a senior White House official said Monday. The statement was an acknowledgment by the administration that it may not be possible to reach a deal on a long-term increase in the debt ceiling before a critical Oct. 17 deadline.

Gene Sperling, director of the National Economic Council, said members of Congress ultimately have the responsibility to decide how often they want to raise the debt ceiling, although he argued that an extended hike is preferable. …

The Treasury says it will run low on cash in as little as 10 days, placing the nation at risk of a historic default. Some Republicans have suggested that if Congress can’t reach an agreement by Oct. 17, they might try to forge a coalition to support an interim measure to increase the $16.7 trillion debt ceiling for as little as six weeks.

Sperling’s comments Monday suggested that the White House would accept such a measure. The statement was notable because administration officials had rejected a short-term debt ceiling increase during a similar impasse in the summer of 2011, when the White House insisted that the debt limit be increased to cover borrowing through 2012

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: debtceiling; shortterm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 10/07/2013 8:30:11 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

There should be no need for an increase....period.


2 posted on 10/07/2013 8:31:20 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Yup-hold their feet to the fire!


3 posted on 10/07/2013 8:31:50 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The test of every religious, political, or educational system is the man that it forms." H. Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Cracks are forming folks, don’t give up and don’t give in.


4 posted on 10/07/2013 8:33:10 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

And what exactly does this mean?


5 posted on 10/07/2013 8:33:17 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

If I need to stay in my budget and cut back expenses dramatically, why don’t they? Make them CUT!


6 posted on 10/07/2013 8:33:30 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

It’s probably what Thanksgiving and Christmas is best used for to these jerks. So they can trot out “how can you be so heartless”memes


7 posted on 10/07/2013 8:36:14 AM PDT by SaintDismas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
"President Obama would accept a short-term increase in the federal borrowing cap , rather than one lasting a year or more,...."

How stupid does he think we are?

8 posted on 10/07/2013 8:36:24 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

A short-term deal?

Why?

All that would mean is a repeat in a few weeks.

The House, Senate and White House have been doing this dance since 2009. Budget crisis, temp deal, new budget crises, temp deal.


9 posted on 10/07/2013 8:36:39 AM PDT by TomGuy (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Of course, as a political maneuver, this pretty smoothly gives the Democrats a soapbox: "Hey, we tried to negotiate! We tried to stop the default! We brokered a deal for a short-term solution to avoid catastrophe, and those Republicans refused!"

I'd like to hold the line, but it has to be done delicately or else we'll be the bad guys.

10 posted on 10/07/2013 8:37:05 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (21st century. I'm not a fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk; Revolting cat!; GeronL

President Pushover just red-lined the red line.


11 posted on 10/07/2013 8:37:49 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
And what exactly does this mean?

they want to have this Debt Battle every 3 months until next years elections

12 posted on 10/07/2013 8:38:07 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
We’ll take a short-term deal on the debt ceiling

Of course they will. Just setting up the next crisis for which they can blame Republicans.

13 posted on 10/07/2013 8:38:35 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (My PV2 is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Lower the damn debt. Get rid of Head start, the EPA etc and piggy pensions for lawmakers. Let them get a real job.


14 posted on 10/07/2013 8:38:46 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
or else we'll be the bad guys.

Conservatives are ALWAYS going to be the bad guys. You just have to man up and accept it, and do the right thing, regardless.

/johnny

15 posted on 10/07/2013 8:39:18 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Hey, we haven’t exactly been brilliant lately. They have good cause to think we’re pretty stupid, I’m sorry to say!

The tide might be turning in the public perception with all the nonsense with the National Parks. Something should break soon.

We have to stay strong.


16 posted on 10/07/2013 8:39:23 AM PDT by dan on the right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“My final offer is this: nothing.”


17 posted on 10/07/2013 8:40:07 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

How about a real budget dbag? What is the longest this country has gone without a budget? This has got to be close to a record?


18 posted on 10/07/2013 8:40:22 AM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Cut the DOJ Budget to H0lder their feet to the fire.


19 posted on 10/07/2013 8:42:30 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
" Since we cannot read minds, we cannot say who -- if anybody -- "wants to shut down the government." But we do know who had the option to keep the government running and chose not to. The money voted by the House of Representatives covered everything that the government does, except for ObamaCare.

The Senate chose not to vote to authorize that money to be spent, because it did not include money for ObamaCare. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says that he wants a "clean" bill from the House of Representatives..."
Thomas Sowell

20 posted on 10/07/2013 8:43:26 AM PDT by yoe ( Defund Obamacare now — or risk voter backlash in 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson