Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: Ted Cruz and the ‘birther’ issue
Dallas News ^ | Aug 19, 2013 | Edtitorial

Posted on 09/02/2013 4:25:59 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Is he a natural-born citizen or isn’t he? The question has been a nagging part of Barack Obama’s life ever since his first presidential campaign. No amount of birth certificates and sworn statements from state officials in Hawaii, his birthplace, seemed capable of putting the issue to rest. The “birther” movement continues pressing the question even today, five years after Obama’s election to the presidency.

The question nags anew, but this time Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz is the focus because he was born in Canada to an American mother and Cuban father. By law, his mother’s U.S. citizenship automatically confers natural citizenship to Cruz, just as — for those who continue to doubt the location of Obama’s birth — the citizenship of Obama’s American mother conferred it to him.

When it became a hot-button issue in 2008, Democrats countered that Obama’s GOP opponent, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, was born to American parents at a U.S. military installation in the Panama Canal Zone. The implication being that if Republicans wanted to play the birther game, Democrats could, too.

This is such a nonissue, regardless of whether the candidate is Republican or Democrat. Nevertheless, narrow-minded individuals, including some prominent personalities such as billionaire former presidential contender Donald Trump, are doggedly trying to concoct controversy and introduce doubt where there should be none.

These men have been natural U.S. citizens from birth and have every right to seek the nation’s highest office. Article II of the Constitution sets out three eligibility requirements to be president: that the person be at least 35 years old, a resident within the United States for 14 years and a “natural-born citizen.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 113th; cruz; cruz2016; elections; naturalborncitizen; nbc; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last
To: Jim Robinson

Thank you!


121 posted on 09/02/2013 8:59:42 PM PDT by luvie (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL of you heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
In the Dallas Morning News Sunday, legal experts told the paper that Cruz is not only eligible for president in the United States, he's also technically a Canadian citizen and can even run for Parliament. Unless he renounces his citizenship there, he could also obtain a Canadian passport, according to the newspaper.

Well talk about qualifications. He can be a US President and a Canadian Parliamentarian at the same time.

122 posted on 09/02/2013 9:08:56 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Cruz is the only prospective candidate worth a damn other than Scott Walker, who fails to excite anyone, unfortunately.

Cruz is our best bet to win. Walker would be a good VP choice.


123 posted on 09/02/2013 9:10:35 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

i think we are going to insist that you do some phoning into Dubuque this time. A road trip would work, too.


124 posted on 09/02/2013 9:23:49 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Impy
WEEKEND GET-AWAY FOR THE Windy City Freeper Crowd


125 posted on 09/02/2013 9:29:10 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Thank you for the ping.

This editorial comes to the correct conclusion regarding eligibility. What may surprise some people is that Cruz's eligibility will be supported by most law professors and mainstream experts. There will be a few leftwing crackpots who will scream foul, but there will not be enough of them to permit the MSM to take them seriously. The MSM will support Cruz's eligibility. They will still oppose his candidacy, of course, but not based on eligibility issues.

Ted Cruz - 2016

126 posted on 09/02/2013 9:37:20 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
YOUR LINK

THIS LINK

Check the dates. Read the comments. Strange...

Thanks for the link anyway.

Special Ramirez Advance Copy Editorial Cartoon 09/03/13 > > > > >

RAMIREZ

LATEST LARGE 09/02/13
SPECIAL ADVANCED COPY 09/03/13
ARCHIVE

In his latest Ramirez covers:
Syria Denies Using Chemical Weapons
And in the advance copy of tomorrow's, Ramirez covers:
Obama Paints a Red Line

127 posted on 09/02/2013 9:41:44 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (This post coming to you today from behind the Camelskin Curtain. Not the Iron or Bamboo Curtain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I will stand by my own evaluation of POTUSA eligibility taking into consideration others comments and my own readings as to the issue which includes writings by Founders in establishing the the USA. I have had years of working with and participating in writing laws from local to Federal levels. I have learned to look at nuances of discussions including personal opinions before forming an opinion of my own or taking a stand. I maintain that the time I spent overseas in WWII and my brother’s death on Okinawa entitles me to act according to my conscience as to what I believe the Founders expressed as to all aspects of Their and my Constitution. I do not want that Constitution mangled or distorted or circumvented based on the acts and results of Obama and his enablers. I can see and realize for myself the outrage of persons who want Obama and his enablers of any kind to be removed from any influence as to the USA. However, I do not understand that such a position as mine seems to be heresy; but I will never go against my judgement.


128 posted on 09/02/2013 10:19:36 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

I-o-wa? Is that one of those cow states on the way to California? ;D


129 posted on 09/03/2013 12:09:36 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Impy

cannot believe ye have never been. Just 3 hours west of CHI-Town. A nice river to look at too.


130 posted on 09/03/2013 12:17:03 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Nope never did, I went to Minneapolis but we drove through Wisconsin rather than Iowa, saves an hour.

Maybe the Iowa Cubs will be good next year. I just looked at the AAA Standings, Omaha won that division with a record of 70-74


131 posted on 09/03/2013 12:29:29 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Impy

i been all over the midwest in 1984
Chicago for 1 day and night on the town
SO ILL, Carbondale for a few weeks.
Cedar Rapids, IA ... a month, Minneapolis for a day
some miltary facility near East St Louis
Bedford, IN
Fort Campbell, KY/TN
Offut near Omaha
the Air Force base in THE U.P., Michigan

Charleston, WVA for a day

never been west of Cleveland or south of DC since ‘85, except one train ride to northern Alabama in ‘93. I was on Amtrak coming thru the tunnel into NYC on the day of the first WTC bombing. I think Amtrak goes right under the WTC.

If ya drive thru Indianapolis once, that is enough for a lifetime. But I liked it.


132 posted on 09/03/2013 12:59:05 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“they all knew that 2008 was a coup”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

At the time I called it a bloodless coup, it is more and more obvious now that it was indeed a coup, bloodless no longer seems accurate.


133 posted on 09/03/2013 4:45:15 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
1. I found "a" link for you addressing the issue. I didn't learn of this from this link..it was all over TV last week.

2. If you are going to send me links, why didn't you look it up yourself? You think my name is "Google?"

You come across as a disagreeable individual picking a fight.

Get a life!

134 posted on 09/03/2013 6:40:12 AM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

Didn’t realize you were so brittle.

Please accept my apology for pushing you over the edge.

No I didn’t think your name was Google. It didn’t seem unreasonable for me to ask you to provide a source, since you had seen it and I hadn’t.

As for me getting a life, right back at you.

If you are this close to going postal all the time, you have my deepest sympathy.


135 posted on 09/03/2013 6:48:45 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (This post coming to you today from behind the Camelskin Curtain. Not the Iron or Bamboo Curtain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: trisham

That’s my senator, baby! Cruz kicks butt.


136 posted on 09/03/2013 7:59:42 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Exactly!


137 posted on 09/03/2013 8:00:32 AM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I was LOL! at you!...not even close to "the edge."

I was amazed that you had missed all the talk about Cruz renouncing his Canadian citizenship since it was all over the news.

That's all.

138 posted on 09/03/2013 8:30:59 AM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Most of the time for the most part, a candidate for POTUS is at least marginally honorable enough to not require a conflict on their NBC eligibility.

Nobama was never confronted, prior to being elected because blacks and liberals thought it was “their turin” and none of them cared if he was half Stalin.

Once sworn in, its rightfully a bitch to get them unsworn and they are legally POTUS short of impeachment.


139 posted on 09/03/2013 8:35:51 AM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missle - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
You really should take down your Christmas lights.

Heh! I couldn't resist.

Hey, I'm a redneck woman
And I ain't no high class broad
I'm just a product of my raising
And I say, 'hey y'all' and 'yee-haw'
And I keep my Christmas lights on
On my front porch all year long
And I know all the words to every ol' Bocephus song
So here's to all my sisters out there keeping it country
Let me get a big 'hell yeah' from the redneck girls like me, hell yeah
Hell yeah, hell yeah
Hell yeah
I said hell yeah!
~Chorus, Redneck Woman by Gretchen Wilson
(My Christmas lights come down every year on New Year's Eve.)
140 posted on 09/03/2013 8:46:24 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson