Posted on 08/27/2013 12:23:45 PM PDT by lbryce
Thousands of sick and dying Syrians had flooded the hospitals in the Damascus suburbs before dawn, hours after the first rockets landed, their bodies convulsing and mouths foaming. Their vision was blurry and many could not breathe.
Overwhelmed doctors worked frantically, jabbing their patients with injections of their only antidote, atropine, hoping to beat back the assault on the nervous system waged by suspected chemical agents. In just a few hours, as the patients poured in, the atropine ran out.
To avoid contamination, medics stripped new arrivals down to their underwear and doused them with water before taking them inside.
New patients kept coming. One doctor from the town of Kafr Batna likened the scene to a horror movie, with cars bringing in entire families fathers, mothers and children all of them dead.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Yeah, and after Saddam we got Maliki. Some bargain that was.
Anybody who ends up on top of this dung heap is going to be worse than the one who is there now. Not our problem.
Maybe. But did Assad do it?
World Net Daily is reporting evidence of US Allies behind the Gas Attack
http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/video-shows-rebels-launching-gas-attack-in-syria/
This one doesn't pass the smell test.
The country is in worse financial shape than Detroit and we still can’t stop dumping money and lives into the middleastern hell hole.
Horrifying as chemical weapons are, the takeover of Syria by Al Qaeda is the alternative.
There are no good choices here.
Therefore, I recommend no action.
Agreed. Assad clearly knew and knows the grave implications of using chemical weapons and how it would bring nothing but universal condemnation and hurt his cause, thus ... he didn’t do it.
So now the NYTimes is tryingto lay down cover for Obama with gripping stories about the gas attack, huh?
Where was the NYTimes when Saddam gassed the Kurds? Oh, yeah, that was Bush.
Reagan always used the old aphorism: “Trust but verify.”
Well, when you’re in an environment in which there is no one who can be trusted, and no way to verify much of anything, TRUST NO ONE.
I’ll believe anything unless I read about it in the New York Times.
Here is a link to a story filed after the sinking of the Lusitania entitled “Toll of Lusitania victims Laid to German Murder lust”:
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83045433/1915-07-18/ed-1/seq-9/#words=case+Lusitania
Just Islam in action.
Fascinating link, source. Thank you very much for posting.
Did we do this? Why is this our fault? Why should we get into this civil war?
The Reichstag Fire scenario, very possibly with collusion by the same American players who brought you Benghazi, seems far more plausible. And every cry of outrage by Kerry and war drum cheerleaders like the NYT just reinforces that estimation.
Right, the opposite makes sense: Rebels do it from captured munitions, get the USA to help overthrow Assad and bango, they’re in!
So the only real question is - Do the rebels have the ability to deploy such weapons?
“Look at the whole board”.......
OK.
And what’s our angle on this? If we were looking for a change in their government, it appears they’re about to do it without help or US military involvement.
I’m not seeing any good reason to get involved here.
No motive whatsoever.
This smells like another falsified 'incident' intended to provoke the war certain leaders in the west clearly want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.