Looks like he's off his meds again. But this time it's all good.
Posted on 08/27/2013 10:57:54 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
As the U.S. reportedly weighs striking Syria, Sen. John McCain blasts the president and his top military officer for being too soft on previous allegations of chemical attacks.
In an interview during a diplomatic trip to South Korea, Sen. John McCain—one of the administration’s fiercest critics on Syria policy—said that recent statements by [Joint Chiefs Chairman General Martin] Dempsey signaled to Assad that he could escalate his use of chemical weapons against his own population without significant international consequences.
“General Dempsey has to be embarrassed,” McCain said about Dempsey’s letter to House Foreign Affairs Committee ranking Democrat Elliott Engel (D–New York) on August 19, in which Dempsey said the U.S. should not intervene militarily in Syria and that even destroying Assad’s air force was not a good idea.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
McCain has no credibility to speak about anything. The guy is stupid and insane.
Looks like he's off his meds again. But this time it's all good.
Here I’d been thinking McCain was nuts - and now I agree with him on something, so what does that make ME?
*SHUDDER*
Article from Mail UK removed in January ...regarding Syria
I am no fan of Obama but just imagine if McCain were president? So-called immigration reform already would be a done deal, our troop levels would be twice as extended throughout the world, the budget deficit and national debt would be just as big, and a clown still would be in office.
Bttt. You will NEVER SEE THIS REPORTED IN THE AMERICAN MEDIA!
Nuts, for listening to him at all.
McInsane doesn’t know what the hell side he’s on.
LOL! Most likely. In my defense, last time around I VOTED for SARAH. (And that’s the ONLY reason!) :)
John McCain is an idiot even when he is right.
McCain would have had us bombing them months ago.
I think the rebels used chemical weapons, and I think Obama (and McCain) want to use the event as an excuse to support the rebels and attack Assad. To that end, it is important to show that Assad -- not the rebels -- used chemical weapons. But why would Assad do that? He's winning the war. He's too smart to blow it by using WMD when he doesn't need to.
Ahhhhhhhh, but maybe Obama made a teeny, tiny mistake and led Assad to believe that he had a green light. Then, Assad made a mistake -- and therefore we are now justified in helping the rebels.
I firmly believe that things are not as they appear.
Could have been Obama's intention all along, set up Assad to pull something stupid, than take him out allowing Obama's buddies in the Muslim Brotherhood to take over.
With the dumb ass crap that went down in Benghazi, this is not hard to believe.
Been trying to access that page, it loads then disappears.
McLame makes me ill; can’t stand to hear his whining.
Arm the rebels. And Assad. Funnel missiles and other WMDs to Syria through Turkey via Benghazi.
Everybody wins....especially 0bama’s backers.
Historians may eventually conclude that Barack Obama's sole positive contribution to the country was that he kept John McCain from being president.
Yes indeed. It’s madness. Directed, hoped-for, planned over generations, insane beyond any known measure...madness...all around us. Best advice to everyone? Look up, and prepare to behold the imminent comeuppance of all wicked and evil men. Looks like it’s gonna get extremely messy first.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.