Skip to comments.Navy ready to launch first strike on Syria [The Clown & Cameron Pretend to be Tough]
Posted on 08/25/2013 3:46:24 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Britain is planning to join forces with America and launch military action against Syria within days in response to the gas attack believed to have been carried out by President Bashar al-Assads forces against his own people.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
Has Cameron lost his mind? Putin might hesitate at sinking a US ship - might; but I suspect he wouldn’t hesitate to sink a couple of British aggressors. Britain can little afford to lose anything. They can’t afford the Navy that they have.
DON’T FORGET....We had victory in Iraq and then the clown lost that!
Good thing the Republicans have such strong defenders of the military.......errr...uhhh......never mind.
"Sequestration is going to remain in effect!"
John Boehner (R-OH), Speaker of the House, 1 Aug 2013
I don’t support this president or administration, and I never support war without our nation proving that it is the absolute last resort, and having Congressional authorization.
However, I will always support our troops. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.
You've obviously never served our country's military. The last time we cut & ran, and trust me were ready to unleash Hell, was in 1983 in Beirut. I'm retired now but please believe me, all of you Putin apologists don't understand or appreciate the service of the men and women that allow you to post such idiotic posts. I don't care who the President is always, bet on the American military!
Loose lips sink ships stfu!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
“It just isn’t hip to protest Obama’s wars.”
Obama has set himself up as the protector of the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Quida world wide.
We lost almost 100,000 KIA in WWIII. It wasn’t cold.
I’m with you.
For what it’s worth, Israel’s intervention in Lebanon caused a giant mess. Which was my point.
Uhh, because one of the sides in that "civil" war was launching missiles at Israeli school children.
I used to ALWAYS bet on the American military.
...But, that was before it was faggotized. No longer have the same faith. Or frankly, respect. Once evil is embraced in an institution, the whole equation changes.
I didn’t say that they were morally wrong to do so. Only that getting involved in a sectarian civil war is a mess.
Yep that’s what worries me. if not the Russkies then the Iranians. They have a lot of sophisticated Russian weapons, including some new fangled high power anti surface ship torpedoes. Drop a few of these into an Eisenhower Class CVN and Barky could have a really bad day. And from what I’ve read we are moving a carrier into the waters east of Cyprus. This could develop into a real FUBAR and I kind of hope Barky punks out. If he lets Cameron pull him into this mess, it won’t be like Maggie Thatcher and Bush 41 and Iraq. it could be much worse.
Could someone tell me the difference between killing 1,000 people with explosives and killing 1,000 people with gas?
That is a very good question.
War Crimes. There’s no UN Resolution for attacking Syria.
The only thing strong enough to overcome this administration’s desire to submit our sovereignty to international bodies is their religious zeal in supporting radical Islam.
We bombed Libya because the UN told us to. We’ll bomb Syria despite them because our current leaders worship at the alter of Baal and will sacrifice our children to him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.