Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim outrage as professor warns first-cousin marriages increase risk of birth defects
Daily Mail ^ | May 30, 2011 | Tom Kelly

Posted on 08/17/2013 5:08:58 AM PDT by grundle

Inbreeding among British Muslims is threatening the health of their children, a leading geneticist warned yesterday.

Professor Steve Jones, from University College London, said the common practice in Islamic communities for cousins to marry each other increased the risk of birth defects.

‘There may be some evidence that cousins marrying one another can be harmful,’ he told an audience at the Hay Festival.

‘We should be concerned about that as there can be a lot of hidden genetic damage. Children are much more likely to get two copies of a damaged gene.

‘Bradford is very inbred. There is a huge amount of cousins marrying each other there.’

Studies have shown that 55 per cent of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins – and in Bradford, this rises to 75 per cent.

Other research has found that children of first cousins are ten times more likely to have recessive genetic disorders and face deafness, blindness and infant mortality.

But Prof Jones’s comments provoked anger among some Muslim groups yesterday.

Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, which promotes the image of Muslims in Britain, said: ‘I know many Muslims who have married their cousins and none of them have had a problem with their children.

‘Obviously, we don’t want any children to be born disabled who don’t need to be born disabled, so I would advise genetic screening before first cousins marry.

'But I find Steve Jones’s comments unworthy of a professor. Using language like “inbreeding” to describe cousins marrying is completely inappropriate and further demonises Muslims.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: islam; muslim; muslims
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
This is two years old but it's the first that I've heard of this topic.
1 posted on 08/17/2013 5:08:58 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

I wonder how legitimate these concerns are. Muslims in many areas have been doing this for literally centuries.

If it were as harmful as some claim, one would expect the damage to be much greater by now than it apparently is.


2 posted on 08/17/2013 5:14:02 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

It comes up all the time in Mn because boat loads of Somalis have moved here and they are cousin lovers. The politicians would have us believe it’s perfectly fine to marry your cousin, you are racist if you object.


3 posted on 08/17/2013 5:15:13 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Well....they’re all Muslims...


4 posted on 08/17/2013 5:15:25 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Fairly common here in Appalachia too


5 posted on 08/17/2013 5:15:34 AM PDT by AppyPappy (Obama: What did I not know and when did I not know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
precisely
6 posted on 08/17/2013 5:16:15 AM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

As a matter of fact, my family tree is so messed up, I entered into a genealogy site and it knocked the website down for two days.


7 posted on 08/17/2013 5:17:31 AM PDT by AppyPappy (Obama: What did I not know and when did I not know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
The concerns are very legitimate. I saved this story from the Telegraph from a couple of years ago:

The problem is worst among children born in Britain's Pakistani community, where more than half of marriages are between first cousins, and children are 10 times more likely than the general population to suffer genetic disorders.

"The medical risks of first cousin marriages include higher rates of infant mortality, birth defects, learning difficulties, blindness, hearing problems and metabolic disorders.

"As adults, the children born from first cousin marriages are at increased risk of miscarriage or infertility. A third of children affected die before their fifth birthday.

"An investigation by Channel 4's Dispatches programme found that although more than 70 British studies have proved the risks, and 700 British Pakistani children are born with associated genetic diseases every year, many people deny the dangers."

On the other hand, they may be breeding faster than native Britons, but they are to a certain extent offsetting that by producing so many unwell children.

8 posted on 08/17/2013 5:23:10 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

“Inbreeding among British Muslims”

well, that explains alot.


9 posted on 08/17/2013 5:23:11 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

It explains a lot.


10 posted on 08/17/2013 5:23:31 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

This happened a lot back in the 19th century pre civil war. Our ancestors looked around at that years’ crop of cousins and the chaos of the civil war and moved west in the mid to late 19th century. Mr. Mercat is related to Mary Todd Lincoln whose parents were cousins and so on going back another two or three generations. He’s pretty sane though so I’m guessing that it all got sorted out.


11 posted on 08/17/2013 5:24:59 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
I hear some of the hospitals have quite horrendous birth defects. I doubt the muslims would have any problem killing a baby that was malformed.
12 posted on 08/17/2013 5:25:52 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
700 British Pakistani children are born with associated genetic diseases every year

Do not question the increased risk, only its degree.

700 is not a particularly large number in a community of this size. If first cousin marriage were as harmful as some claim, it would be more in the range of 70,000 damaged children.

BTW, "increased risk" is often a way of obfuscating rather than enlightening the issue. Is that increase 10%, 100% or 1000%? Inquiring minds want to know.

13 posted on 08/17/2013 5:27:41 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
As a matter of fact, my family tree is so messed up, I entered into a genealogy site and it knocked the website down for two days.

It can't handle recursion? ;-)

14 posted on 08/17/2013 5:28:54 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

It is harmful. We live in an Amish and Mennonite area with a lot of 2nd or 3rd cousin marriages (over generations)and marriages among people who are “double” cousins (both sides of the family). The local doctors advise against it. A local family lost a baby last because the couple were second cousins whose families had intermarried for years.


15 posted on 08/17/2013 5:29:24 AM PDT by Cloverfarm (This too shall pass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

i’m researching families in old cemeteries. noticed that some families have married cousins and most of the children of the next two generations died young....10’s 20’s, 30’s


16 posted on 08/17/2013 5:29:42 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Hmmmmmmmmmmm

My father married his cousin by marriage...

does that count ???

My father’s sister married my mother’s cousin..

:)


17 posted on 08/17/2013 5:29:50 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grundle
I posted a bunch of stuff about consanguineous marriages. Some see this as the source of handicaps that is often the real motivation behind suicide bombers; to wit, their lives are so miserable under Islamist oppression because of their handicaps that death is their only escape. Islamists know that and they take advantage of it.

www.consang.net has a chart "Globally, the most common form of consanguineous union contracted is between first cousins"

Global prevalence of consanguinity

Coincidence? I don't think so.

(Sources of the images are in the links.)

The text is here

Not surprising that there is nothing there that states explicitly that Islamists blah, blah. There is this sole reference (that I could find) "double first cousin marriages, which have the same coefficient of inbreeding [as uncle-niece unions] (F = 0.125), are recognized within Islam"

It seems to me that if "Globally, the most common form of consanguineous union contracted is between first cousins" and the chart shows the Arab countries with the preponderance of consanguineous marriages then that lends a great deal of authority to other 'Net sources that state it outright: "First cousin marriages have been the tradition in many Muslim families for innumerable generations."

Thanks for your post.. I love to post that chart. I hope the owners don't mind and are indeed pleased for the additional publicity.

18 posted on 08/17/2013 5:30:05 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Why be outraged? Either it does, or it doesn’t. Deal with it.


19 posted on 08/17/2013 5:31:01 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
‘There may be some evidence that cousins marrying one another can be harmful...’

May be harmful??? I thought that was pretty well established.

20 posted on 08/17/2013 5:31:48 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson