Revealing: NYT Exposes Clinton Foundation for Shady Financial and Business Deals and

Town Hall ^ | 8/14/13 | Kate Andrews

[Nachum]

Times is back online, although many of its links--including its link to the story on the Clinton Foundation--are still not working. More to follow.

..

On Wednesday, The New York Times published a devastating report, detailing the financial tensions and shady business deals surrounding the Clinton Foundation.

The New York Times went off-line earlier this morning and is still not up and running. The Daily Telegraph and Fox News are the only sources so far reporting on this issue. But why would the New York Times go down for so long after this news broke?

Founded in 2001, the Clinton Foundation has been ‘off limits’ to conservative critics, who feared (even legitimate) criticism would be received poorly due to the noble, charitable efforts of the foundation.

No longer—

[Nachum]

Full title: Revealing: NYT Exposes Clinton Foundation for Shady Financial and Business Deals and then Goes Offline

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America]

Hillary calls 0bama. 0bama calls NSA. NSA downs NYT and relevant articles. Done.

[CincyRichieRich]

BS; NYT hack was a lie, timed with Hillary’s planned story to make it old news for 2015.

BS BS BS

[ryan71]

These fools are late to the party. About 20 years late. I hope they’re not trying to reestablish their credibility ‘cause I was really enjoying the idea of their disappearing soon.

[Gaffer]

The New York Times went off-line earlier this morning and is still not up and running

Well, it seems the NSA has other talents the citizens of this country are not entirely privy to, huh?

[Oldexpat]

Imelda Clinton is getting this outed before the big Presidential run...making it old news which has been hashed over and all the MSM has given her the blessing still.
It will be ho-hum by the time 2015 rolls around.

[oh8eleven]

Imelda Clinton
LOL ...
I'm not one who normally wishes that bad things should happen to others,
but for Hitlery, I'll gladly make an exception.

[molson209]

well it’s the Clinton Foundation ,created to fill Clinton Pockets

[griswold3]

Her motto was going to be ‘Hillary, Restoring Trust in Government’ which is bizarre with Obama in the WH. I don’t think Obama was amused.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/13/hillary-clinton-kicking-tour-restore-trust-governm/

[A CA Guy]

I wish her personal good health as I would anyone. I don’t wish fellow Americans bad things.

I do wish her a future life with LITTLE influence on anyone else though.
I do not wish her political success of any kind.

She is IMO dirty, unaccomplished and a mess. She also stands by her husband’s crimes IMO with women and may have been involved in some herself.

Not a good next President for sure.

[tacticalogic]

Her motto was going to be ‘Hillary, Restoring Trust in Government’ which is bizarre with Obama in the WH. I don’t think Obama was amused.

No kidding. It's prettty bad when the "I don't recall" Shredder Queen is going to fix your credibility problems.

[Standing Wolf]

[amazement, fake] The Clintons are up to something smarmy? [/amazement]

[Homer1]

we’re being played. The upshot is free publicity for a charitable organization run by the Clintons.

[Old Sarge]

The Old Gray Whore of Babylon-on-Hudson deserves to die.

[thouworm]

I was able to pull it up:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us/politics/unease-at-clinton-foundation-over-finances-and-ambitions.html?hp&_r=1&;

[isthisnickcool]

Isn't it ironic that the Obama administration would throw wrenches in to the type of nonprofits that the Tea Party types were organizing while at the same time allowing "nonprofit foundations" run by Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton to abuse the system and enrich their families and friends?

I have been posting about the abuse of nonprofit corporations here on FR for at least 10 years. At one point years back I was pointing out how Carter and Clinton were gaming the system. Clinton's "nonprofit" is especially a farce since it is quickly becoming the core entity for Hillary running for president.

Bill Clinton gets money from people all over the planet. Millions from the Arabs to Coca-Cola. For what? A smile? Nope, in exchange for access to the United States Treasury. It is HILARIOUS when the Clinton's present their scam as if it is some kind of foundation they are running using their own money. They have never put a dime in to it and never will. Even Ms. Overbite is an employee.

As I have been writing for 15 years: "The only nonprofit corporations should be those that feed, house or clothe human beings".

FYI, I started griping about "nonprofits" here on FR when I started looking in to the entity known as Judicial Watch. I was appalled that it was a nonprofit and I still am. Today, there are about 1 million more nonprofits than when I first started looking at this issue and they continue to grow. Just a tidbit of information, do you know how many Mexican nonprofits there are? Basically, none.

[Excellence]

Band’s private firm, Teneo, charged its clients fees as high as $250,000 per month—clients that were also Clinton Foundation donors.

I seem to remember Hillary's body girl, Huma, worked for Teneo.

Found it:

Abedin did work for outside clients, and one of her friends confirmed they totaled four entities in all: the State Department, Hillary Clinton, the William Jefferson Clinton Foundation and Teneo, a firm co-founded by Doug Band, a former counselor for Bill Clinton.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kateandrews/2013/08/14/revealing-nytimes-exposes-clinton-foundation-n1664254

[RetiredTexasVet]

Just a little glitch in the Internet .... NSA will have the problem fixed shortly ..................

[FredZarguna]

... timed with Hillary’s planned story to make it old news for 2015

Bingo.

I'll be impressed when then NYT breaks this kind of a story 72 hours before a general election for President, and not before. This is inoculation, administered well before it can do any damage. If brought up when it matters, it will be "old news, move on."