> Is it Alright to Abort a Lesbian Baby?
How idiotic.
There is NO SUCH THING!
We are all born SINNERS.
Some of us are predisposed to one type of sin over another, but Jesus Christ has conquered sin and death!
That would be hate crime. /S
Already an issue with sex selection abortions. Feminists have made noise that they should be outlawed. All of a sudden it’s not so much an absolute right...
Logical contradictions don’t bother the left at all. It is common for communists to believe two contradictory things at the same time.
All hypothetical and based on totally false premises ..however, the article does raise what are some good points which when reframed are fairly difficult ones for the homo and pro-abort crowd to argue against.
Science will make this a red-herring.
Wont have to abort Gay Tots— youll be able to cure them InVitro. Gene therapy, almost here.
So the argument is that sexual preferences are baked in at birth. Gay people are born gay so it’s not fair to pick on or criticize them. And pedophiles? Are they born that way too? Should we accept them because “it’s not a choice”?
“You are going to have a lesbian”.
Where’s my coat hanger?
Betcha I can pave the garden walk with the bricks that one will bring my way.
;-)
anyone, anywhere, anyplace, anytime so ...yes.
One of the reasons the gay left has gotten very quiet on the “born like that” issue. If your kid looks gay in the womb, why not abort it? I assume, that if the embryo looks lesbian, it’s wearing large shoes and a bad haircut.
There is NO such thing. Lesbians are made, not born.
There is anecdotal evidence that many people abort Down’s syndrome babies in large numbers nowadays. That’s okay with liberals. So, if a gay gene was ever found, liberals should be okay with aborting homosexual babies.
WTF kind of question is this...
i will tell you, it is a question with an answer designed to be twisted into anything the questioner wants it to mean....
my answer...
how do you know if the baby is gay or not..
please, use scientific data in your response..
that in and of itself will shut them up
This is actually a great argument to present to liberals and one I’ve made to them myself more than once. If they truly support abortion for any reason then they would have to support abortion for this reason. That said, I don’t believe a gene will ever be found that can be linked to what is clearly a preference and not a physical characteristic in human beings.
I think a law should be passed limiting abortions to registered Democrat women.
If they can prove they have been registered as Ds for more than 5 years the abortion is paid for by the government.
Registered Republicans would get prison time.
of course, as the left reminds us all the time re personhood, they are not babies, they are tissue or fetuses that are not viable outside the mom.
Gay is not genetic. There is no such child.
How would one know the baby was a lesbian?
Don’t they REALLY mean: “Is it ok to abort a lesbian’s baby?”
Of course; the answer is no. to aborting ANY baby!
Some recent research suggests that abnormal conditions in the womb during pregnancy predispose a male baby towards becoming homosexual (it is not genetic). If that is the case, then it should be possible to test the pregnant mother for those conditions, and perhaps give her a prescription to bring her pregnancy hormones back to normal levels, thus preventing her baby from becoming homosexual.
Regardless of whether gays are born that way, homosexuality is a pathology. It does gays no good to refuse to research cures for it, so that they could have the prospect of living a normal life. Sorry, but gay "marriage" is not going to give them the normal life they crave. Only a real cure can do that.