Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking - Jury will not get to see Trayvon fighting texts
legalinsurrection.com ^ | 7-10-2013 | Andrew Branca

Posted on 07/10/2013 7:48:33 AM PDT by servo1969

Also, Animated Video Not Evidence

The Judge in the Zimmerman trial just ruled that the jury will not get to see numerous text messages on Trayvon Martin’s phone regarding his prowess at fighting, including texts as to how to punch someone in the nose and make them bleed.

The Judge did not give an explanation for her ruling other than to stand by her prior ruling as to social media evidence.

It is not clear if the Judge found a lack of authentication, which was one of the arguments last night. The Judge did indicate she reviewed the Lumarque case in which a trial court was reversed for failing to allow text messages.

The Judge also ruled that an animated video prepared by the defense (consisting of still animation pages, not motion) will not be allowed in evidence, but could be used as a demonstrative exhibit by the defense. That means that the animation images are merely part of the defense argument, probably in closing, not evidence the jury takes back into the jury room.

[photo]


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: banglist; martin; text; trayvon; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: servo1969

Suppression of evidence by the judge.............


41 posted on 07/10/2013 8:37:49 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

That pic of Judge Nelson must have been 20 years and 75 pounds ago.


42 posted on 07/10/2013 8:38:06 AM PDT by July4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

What? If she was interested in justice, this trial would be over and verdict ‘not guilty’. And then she still wouldn’t be his best friend but simply a judge doing it’s job.


43 posted on 07/10/2013 8:40:03 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: commish
That is not a real woman - that is John Goodman in

"drag!!!!!"

At first I thought she looked like Gene Hackman. But he looked better. Or maybe John Travolta, or Robin Williams?

44 posted on 07/10/2013 8:41:27 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Fear.of.riots


45 posted on 07/10/2013 8:54:49 AM PDT by AbolishCSEU (Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Yes, the jury will get to see it, because she ruled that the defense could use it in closing arguments.


46 posted on 07/10/2013 9:03:06 AM PDT by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
I have read Trayvon’s text messages. He was always looking for a fight. When this trial is over and the jury members are able to read the texts that the judge would not allow, they will really be mad that this evidence was withheld from them.
Obama says if he had a son he would look like Trayvon. If he had a son he would probably act like Trayvon too. Both are thugs.
If there are riots after the trial, you can bet 90% of the rioters could care less about the trial. It will only be an excuse to rob a liquor store or steal TV sets.
47 posted on 07/10/2013 9:03:19 AM PDT by Cindy of Nashville (What has the Democrat party become???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Too bad, the jury needs to realize that Trayvon died doing what he enjoyed doing.


48 posted on 07/10/2013 9:59:42 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

At this point, they are probably happy about this. They are likely getting off anyway, but if they don’t, this seems a pretty clear shot at getting a retrial.


49 posted on 07/10/2013 10:08:56 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Is the judge a democrat?

We post, you decide....


50 posted on 07/10/2013 10:53:49 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Of course she is and under the thumb of “the ruler”


51 posted on 07/10/2013 10:54:25 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
I think you mean grounds for reversal on appeal.

That would be correct. This is grounds for reversal on appeal.

52 posted on 07/10/2013 11:36:17 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
The Judge did indicate she reviewed the Lumarque case in which a trial court was reversed for failing to allow text messages.


53 posted on 07/10/2013 11:43:26 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Anyone else see the movie "Nothing but Trouble"?


54 posted on 07/10/2013 11:46:17 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson