Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Is Embarrassed by Obamacare
Townhall.com ^ | July 9, 2013 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 07/09/2013 8:04:15 AM PDT by Kaslin

Barack Obama assured us that, after his signature legislation Obamacare went into effect, we would surely like it. Now Obama has decided he doesn't want us to find out how it affects us until after the 2014 elections.

Obamacare is designed to force employers of 50 or more full-time employees to provide comprehensive health insurance that includes a mandate to pay for an abortion-inducing drug. The penalty for non-compliance is a tax of $2,000 per fulltime employee per year (beyond the first 30), and the Internal Revenue Service was supposed to start collecting the penalties on Jan. 1.

Obama apparently thinks he can conceal the mess he created, which even the Democrats who voted for it now call a "train wreck," by simply postponing the effective date of the employer mandate one year. But the Obamacare law, as upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, unambiguously states: "EFFECTIVE DATE ... The amendments made by this section shall apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013."

Obama has no authority to alter the timetable of the law's implementation. Maybe he should actually read the 2,700 pages of text in the Obamacare law and its 20,000 pages of regulations.

Obama doesn't seem to care whether his order to delay Obamacare is lawful or not. He wants to avoid the trouble the destructive employer mandate would cause for Democratic candidates before the next election of the House of Representatives, an election he deems critical to his plan to "fundamentally transform the United States."

The postponement of the employer mandate is not the first setback to the Obamacare timeline. A few months ago, the Obama administration quietly announced that the federally run state-level exchanges will not offer a choice of plans to employees of small businesses until after the 2014 elections.

The one-year extension for employers will create havoc in the exchanges where individuals are supposed to buy next year's health insurance. The government admitted July 5 that it won't be able to verify whether applicants qualify for the subsidies that are supposed to make the required coverage "affordable" but plans to give out the subsidies anyway.

Meanwhile, Obamacare's expansion of Medicaid is being rejected by the states. After the Supreme Court's June 2012 decision in NFIB v. Sebelius gave states the OK to reject this expansion, 27 of 50 states did not implement Obamacare's Medicaid plan.

States were wise to reject this very expensive Medicaid expansion.

Obamacare required that anyone with income below 133 percent of the poverty level would be eligible for Medicaid and sought to expand eligibility to able-bodied, non-elderly, childless adults, that is, to people without dependents who were able but perhaps unwilling to support themselves.

In addition to having sections of Obamacare postponed and rejected outright, Obamacare is also failing to fulfill Obama's promise that it would decrease the deficit. The funds that were supposed to pay down the deficit included the money anticipated to flow from the penalty payments made by employers who refused to obey the mandate to provide comprehensive healthcare to their employees.

Now that employers will not be required to pay those fines in 2014 for violating the mandate, and indeed will not even be required to report whether they are complying, it is obvious that Obamacare will not produce the promised deficit reduction.

This isn't the first time Obama has taken actions that are clearly in violation of our laws. For example, two federal courts have ruled against him for making recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board while the Senate was not in recess.

Obama unlawfully removed the work requirement from the 1996 welfare reform law signed by President Bill Clinton, even though the law explicitly prohibits waivers to the work requirement. That reform required most welfare recipients to actually work or be in job training in order to receive welfare.

Obama simply used executive orders to pretend to legislate the DREAM Act, which Congress has repeatedly refused to pass. His bypassing of the law was so out of line that even his former economic adviser remarked, "I don't totally get how the president can do this through executive order."

Obama had the Department of Homeland Security implement key measures of the DREAM Act in order to essentially grant amnesty to many illegal aliens. Because of the large number of applications for amnesty, background checks were given up in favor of so-called "lean and lite" procedures.

By the way, that is exactly what will happen to background checks for the 11 million illegal aliens who hope to be granted U.S. residency by the amnesty bill now awaiting action in the House. If the background check of the Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev couldn't discover his obvious terrorist plans, what hope do we have for background checks of the 11 million?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: 0carenightmare; abortion; antiamerica; deathpanels; dhs; executiveorder; homosexualmuslim; liar; mysteryman; obama; obamacare; obamaobamacare; welfarereform; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2013 8:04:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obozo is too stupid to understand that by unilaterally declaring “OK, we’ll wait one more year” he is affecting $BILLIONS of dollars of changes, just on a whim

Is there NO ONE in washington with the balls to stand up to THIS INCOMPETANT BOOB?
(maybe Sarah Palin)


2 posted on 07/09/2013 8:07:11 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What does Obastard care for the law?


3 posted on 07/09/2013 8:07:40 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama has only one goal - to enable the federal government to bend everyone to its will.


4 posted on 07/09/2013 8:08:42 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama is practicing the same methodology that has been rampant in business for the past decade or two: put power in the hands of inexperienced, incompetent people because they are the “best and brightest” (based on GPA and degrees from elite schools, allow them to wreak havoc like unsupervised children without any adult supervision, and then promote them or hire them into even bigger jobs before the mistakes of the past catch up to them. Competence has been redefined as “staying one step ahead of the sins of your past”.


5 posted on 07/09/2013 8:09:29 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

More importantly and needing urgent attention, what attempts are being made to unseat this stupid mystery muslim and homosexual agenda agent?


6 posted on 07/09/2013 8:09:46 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Exactly. Obamacare was written by the Soros’ funded Center for American Progress. It was meant as a means of government control and redistribution. And once it is in place, socialized medicine and rationing in the next step.


7 posted on 07/09/2013 8:11:43 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He should be he’s a friggin idiot like all liberals.


8 posted on 07/09/2013 8:14:18 AM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You can’t embarrass a fool.


9 posted on 07/09/2013 8:16:00 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Obama Is Embarrassed by Obamacare

0bama is an embarrassment to AMERICA! (Hell, out or 300+ million we apparently can't even find a citizen to be president? we have a kenyan usurper instead?)

10 posted on 07/09/2013 8:16:24 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It's your baby now Barack. History will not treat you kindly me thinks.
11 posted on 07/09/2013 8:17:36 AM PDT by McGruff (I need a new party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not to fear, he’ll read it during the commercials on ESPN Sports Center.


12 posted on 07/09/2013 8:17:48 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
You can’t embarrass a fool.

...or a narcissist who drinks his own bath water.

13 posted on 07/09/2013 8:17:48 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No he isn’t.


14 posted on 07/09/2013 8:18:43 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

It makes no sense to me to delay implementation, even if somehow this is legal for the president to do so.

Obamacare was passed in March 2010. We were told that different pieces of the law would be phased in over a period of years, to allow for a smooth transition to the new law, among other things.

So, after over three years, the Obama administration is so imcompetent that they need yet another year to properly administer the employer mandate piece of the law? Really? After over three years of preparation, they are still not ready????

Why aren’t Republicans, or any talking heads in the media, talking about how this represents gross incompetence on the part of this administration?


15 posted on 07/09/2013 8:19:25 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

The only negative feeling he has about it is that its negative aspects are being exposed too soon before its tentacles are into the whole of America.


16 posted on 07/09/2013 8:20:26 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Will no one rid me of this turbulent law?..................


17 posted on 07/09/2013 8:20:56 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

It’s why he’s pushing amnesty incognito. Behind the acenes but completely in charge


18 posted on 07/09/2013 8:22:15 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just say no! Just don’t participate.


19 posted on 07/09/2013 8:23:37 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

It’s called the Peter Principle. Seen it work to perfection many times, yet businesses continue to keep the practice alive.

Albert Einstein said it best: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results”


20 posted on 07/09/2013 8:26:29 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (I wish people would get their heads out of their butts and their noses out of everyones business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson