Eric Holder Refuses To Answer If DOJ Monitored Phones for Members of Congress

Youtube ^ | 6/6/13 | goprapidresponse·

[Nachum]

Published on Jun 6, 2013

Eric Holder Refuses To Answer If DOJ Monitored Phones for Members of Congress (June 6, 2013)

[Nachum]

Vid at link

It all depends on what the definition of "spy" is.

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[DoughtyOne]

Tall branch, short rope...

[cld51860]

Incredible.

[cripplecreek]

There can only be 1 of two answers. A simple “No” would have been easy and they could have moved on. The non answer he gave just dumped more blood in the water.

[keats5]

First they went after the Tea Party...

[stephenjohnbanker]

” Tall branch, short rope...”

After we expose the taps on Republicans.

[MestaMachine]

If you are a masochist and want to watch it, I guess this is the place.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise. Thanks.

[RoosterRedux]

There can only be 1 of two answers. A simple “No” would have been easy and they could have moved on. The non answer he gave just dumped more blood in the water.

That was my first thought, but there is another possibility.

His refusal to answer might have been just another middle finger salute.

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

“The non answer he gave just dumped more blood in the water.”

Probably trying to throw a scare into his inquisitors.

[drypowder]

he did not want to purger himself once again by saying no.
I hope this makes even the establishment republicans in both houses realize who these folks in the WH really are and that not one American is certain of being immune from this administration’s wrath.

[mrsmel]

I was about to get all happy because I first misread the headline as saying that he monitered the phones of members of Congress. The only way they'd ever get fired up enough to get serious about this is if their ox was being gored (if then).

[SilverMine]

The answer is they have. I vae called members of Congress, two on their cells from my Verizon cell. So by simple deduction the answer is YES.

[cuban leaf]

The number of controversies coming out of this administration is truly staggering. And it is just beginning.

Dang this is gonna leave a mark. On all of us.

[atc23]

Wait’ll Hussein finds out about this on the evening news - oh, boy - there’ll be heck to pay!

[Marcella]

His answer was unbelievable! He said he would be glad to come back at another time to discuss that. The guy asking the question said the answer he wanted was “No.”

If Holder wasn’t monitoring members of congress he could have said, “No”, but he didn’t say it. If you were a member of congress what would you think of that answer? Would you think you could have a phone conversation without Holder or one of his henchmen, listening or searching your call list record to see who you called?

Shades of RUSSIAN KGB SECRET POLICE! Better arrange a meeting on a park bench to speak to someone, or even better, take a walk with someone at the local trash dump so it will be private.

Check behind you when in your car to see if you are being followed by Holder’s gestapo/KGB.

Hire a private guard in case Holder wants to grab you off the street.

He couldn’t say, “No.”

[I want the USA back]

They know the public’s attention span is about the same as the length of a hollywood hearthrob’s marriage, so if they can just hold on a little longer...

[Kartographer]

Only the Republican Members of Congress who are part of the ‘Tea Party’ wing phones were monitored.