Posted on 05/20/2013 6:07:00 AM PDT by Lakeshark
For me, its about collaboration. National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley on the relationship between the anti-Tea Party IRS union and the Obama White House
Is President Obama directly implicated in the IRS scandal?
Is the White House Visitors Log the trail to the smoking gun?
The stunning questions are raised by the following set of new facts.
March 31, 2010.
According to the White House Visitors Log, provided here in searchable form by U.S. News and World Report, the president of the anti-Tea Party National Treasury Employees Union, Colleen Kelley, visited the White House at 12:30pm that Wednesday noon time of March 31st.
The White House lists the IRS union leaders visit this way:
Kelley, Colleen Potus 03/31/2010 12:30
In White House language, POTUS stands for President of the United States.
The very next day after her White House meeting with the President, according to the Treasury Departments Inspector Generals Report, IRS employees the same employees who belong to the NTEU set to work in earnest targeting the Tea Party and conservative groups around America. The IG report wrote it up this way:
April 1-2, 2010: The new Acting Manager, Technical Unit, suggested the need for a Sensitive Case Report on the Tea Party cases. The Determinations Unit Program Manager Agreed.
In short: the very day after the president of the quite publicly anti-Tea Party labor union the union for IRS employees met with President Obama, the manager of the IRS Determinations Unit Program agreed to open a Sensitive Case report on the Tea party cases. As stated by the IG report.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
Its like saying if person A gets a visit from person B, and the next day person B robs a bank, person A is guilty of bank robbery.
If person A is a known bank robber, gets a visit from person B who then goes and robs the bank, there is going to be a suspicion of collusion. I think that characterizes it better.......
You’re very welcome.
The 2009 report website also starts out with the below. So whether Obummer “has a commitment to be transparent” or not (we’ve seen over the years it has been NOT) - he’s required to provide this report.
“Since 1995, the White House has been required to deliver a report to Congress listing the title and salary of every White House Office employee.”
Yep, it’s not a smoking gun, I guess it’s why it’s a question mark in the title of the article.
Yes, they used a question mark, but if they didn’t actually think it was a smoking gun, they wouldn’t have used those two words.
One thing for sure, it doesn't look good, and it's correct to point that out.
Good observation, although it seems as if, while there was a ceremony, she wasn’t part of it but may have been part of some other small group there to get their federal employee union marching orders from the community organizer himself. Also, why her earlier WH meetings (with a couple of unknown people, although I think I’ve seen at least one of the names before in some other, not-good context)? In theory, she shouldn’t be important enough to merit WH meetings, and secondly, because her job involves federal unions, she shouldn’t even have WH meetings.
She’s the head of a very specific federal employee union, as well as being the head of an anti-Tea Party group in what turns out to be the agency that took the lead in targeting the Tea Party. These things did in fact take off as formal policy after her WH visits, so while you can’t say “post hoc propter hoc” (”after and thus because of”), you can certainly say “highly suspicious, needs further investigation.”
” Historically, it is the fascist/trade union interface that was used in Europe to undermine and destroy civil society. In this IRS case there is the destruction of civil society and trampling the Constitution.Serious Crimes.
The FBI should be directing their flat feets right to Colleen Kelley’s door, AND Issa’s Congressional Oversight Committee should depose her immediately.”
The FBI won’t do anything, but Issa might.
Not necessarily, but any cop would certainly give person A a closer look.
The problem is, the MSM will obfuscate, ignore, and lie for this administration. If we can’t take them down, replace them with genuine reporters rather than the current group of democrats with bylines, we will continue to lose.
Yeah, the MSM is the Fifth Column.
Cross-posting this thread because it refers to the same article by Jeffrey Lord and has some informative posts.
Dept. of Agriculture
Dept. of Commerce
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Federal Election Commission
National Credit Union Administration
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Securities and Exchange Commission
Social Security Administration
She's the point person.
NTEU, and Executive Branch, functioning as a criminal conspiracy. We haven’t called it a thugocracy without evidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.