[Lakeshark]

Yep, it's not a smoking gun, I guess it's why it's a question mark in the title of the article.

It’s like saying if person A gets a visit from person B, and the next day person B robs a bank, person A is guilty of bank robbery.

If person A is a known bank robber, gets a visit from person B who then goes and robs the bank, there is going to be a suspicion of collusion. I think that characterizes it better.......

[chessplayer]

Yep, it’s not a smoking gun, I guess it’s why it’s a question mark in the title of the article.

---

Yes, they used a question mark, but if they didn’t actually think it was a smoking gun, they wouldn’t have used those two words.