Missouri Legislature Bans UN Agenda 21

New American ^ | 5/9/13 | Alex Newman

[Baynative]

With a veto-proof majority, the Missouri legislature approved a popular bill protecting private property and due process rights by banning a deeply controversial United Nations “sustainability” scheme known as UN Agenda 21. The legislation, SB 265, now heads to Democrat Governor Jay Nixon, who has not yet taken a public position on the issue. ~snip~

The widely criticized UN scheme, adopted by governments and dictatorships worldwide at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro more than two decades ago, has been marketed as a way to make humanity more “sustainable.” According to UN documents, however, Agenda 21 essentially seeks to restructure human civilization under the guise of environmentalism. Even human thought is in the crosshairs, official reports show.

[Baynative]

The effort to ban Agenda 21 in Missouri, widely celebrated by activists from across the political spectrum, comes in the wake of similar moves to stop the UN plan across America. In Alabama, for example, lawmakers in both houses unanimously approved a law last year prohibiting the international “sustainable development” agenda within the state. Numerous other states are working to do the same, and multiple legislatures have adopted strongly worded resolutions blasting the program.

[PieterCasparzen]

Fantastic. Every State needs to do this.

[musicman]

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

[TheRhinelander]

Good for them. The town I’m in in MA won’t go for this garbage either. We’re a right to farm community, which means just about anyone can raise livestock, etc. I picked the right town.

[PieterCasparzen]

Right to farm, I gotta research that... that sounds great.

[Baynative]

The more people learn, the more they will be able to resist. Like most liberal issues Agenda 21 has been sold under false motives and sweet sounding ideas.

[TheRhinelander]

http://mfbf.net/Portals/0/pdf/Right%20to%20Farm%20Laws.pdf

[PieterCasparzen]

Any time the entity involved in some scheme is a corporation or organization chartered outside your State, its generally bad for your State or corrupt or both.

Goes for housing developments, infrastructure... everything.

[PieterCasparzen]

Wow, that’s some mighty bad legislation.

[SatinDoll]

Even Hobby Farm magazine has been sucked into advocating for “sustainability”.

[PieterCasparzen]

It's funny. We're all for sustainability, if we mean honestly that's what we're talking about.

Who wants to see farmland trashed with chemicals ? I don't.

The elites that are running all this however are actually just using words like that to actually work on a whole host of other nefarious endeavors, often very difficult to discern.

There's a nice report from Kenya on the coffee industry. Guess what one of the keys was - making sure they used Dollars to transact business ! They are making money, taking control to make even more money, have politicians in their back pocket, get US tax dollars and donations flowing to themselves, start wars and rebellions, manipulate the price of commodities, get countries to join the international central banking regime, get the government to tax people, set up tax shelters for themselves, etc., etc., etc., the list goes on and on.

fsg.afre.msu.edu/kenya/coffee_study_sc.pdf

Then, a few years later, after messing things up horribly, world bank has the audacity to write about how bad they've messed things up, as if it was not their fault.

You'll have to google for this paper:

THE SOCIAL COSTS OF STATE FAILURE IN RURAL KENYA site:worldbank.org

This is utterly ridiculous. Just who do a bunch of international traders think they are, to go inside a nation and start dictating to them all the details of their economy ! And they just keep staying and messing around instead of leaving the people of Kenya ALONE. It's very easy to trade with people and NOT ruin them; you just can't try to make more trade or different trade than trade that they can handle.

That's just one example.

These evil people just want to control everyone and everything.

[maine-iac7]

you must be in the Berkshires?

[maine-iac7]

One thing the regime has been good for - thr return of states rights - on right to bear arm, and now this ! Fantastic...

The more these despots push, the more people wake up and stand up!

We just might survive these ‘enemies domestic’ after all!

[sasportas]

Good for the show me state. Does anybody know who the other states are that have taken action like this? I live in Alaska, haven’t heard much about it up here.

[SatinDoll]

Sounds exactly like the people behind BHO2 and Hillary Clinton.

[octex]

Does anybody know who the other states are that have taken action like this?
*****************************
Same question I was going to ask. I’m in TX and have heard very little about 21, other than a few FR postings about either a MS or AL Governor agreeing to something on it.

[Jacquerie]

Now, why in the world are so many States proactively working on legislation to combat a treaty that does not apply to the US? The fear of course is that “Senators” will screw the nation with a treaty that has equal supremacy with our Constitution. What relationship do these three-term Congressmen have with the States they supposedly represent? Answer: Zero.

Question: Would Agenda 21 have even a remote chance if the States still had agency in the Senate? Would a Senate of the States consider relinquishing national and State sovereignty to an international organization? No.

The 17th Amendment was a huge mistake that set us on the path to arbitrary, consolidated government. It must go.

[SeminoleCounty]

Congrats to Missouri on outlawing the Unpunished Nazis land grab

There will be whining from the Liberals, America-Haters, Globalists, Free Traders, and assorted crackpots in both parties...but few want a non-elected government body to make decisions for them

[SeminoleCounty]

Actually, an appointed Senate would mean Agenda 21 passes with ease....getting the required 2/3 vote would be no problem. Most state governors support part or all of the UN agenda..... any one supporting globalism, open borders, free trade, high income taxes, are going to support the UN Agenda....they would be picking the Senators

A Senate that must answer to their electorate is less likely to push soverignity robbing crap like Agenda 21...voters are less globalist than politicians

[phockthis]

sfl