I am inclined to agree with Savage. Rubio was inspiring and brought me to hopeful tears when he won his Senate seat a few years ago.
Just 5 years on, and Rubio’s gulped the DC Kool Aid in the worst way and has turned his back on the wishes of the American people.
Rubio is an example of why we need to repeal the 17th Amendment.
It’s not the Americans best interests he has at heart, it’s the 11 million illegal votes he thinks he’ll get!
ah, What?
We do not fire senators.
They are either elected, reelected no not.
The people of Florida will decide, and so far they like the guy.
Savage’s rants mean nothing.
I miss Savage-in-the-afternoon.
I used to listen to him because I didn’t want to miss the program where his head finally exploded.
He has delivered some great rants.
Great. Now I wish Mark Levin and Rush would do the same. Rubio needs to be on the receiving end of a Mark Levin rant, instead of Levin continuing to smooch on Rubio’s butt.
I voted for Rubio and I whole-heartedly agree with Savage!
After observing Rubio’s amnesty pushing for several weeks now, I’ve concluded that his main motive is to legalize millions of new Latino voters whom he thinks will give his career a boost. He’s on a purely personal quest.
He’s the Bart Stupach of the amnesty debate, pretending to stand for a critical issue (border security) while his real goal is passage of the full amnesty bill.
Agree with Mike. Rubio’s a complete quisling and has got to go. Repubs see the latin equivalent of Obama... clean and articulate.
AMNESTY TWO ISSUES NEVER TOUCHED
ACTIVE FR’S IF YOU SEE ANY CREDITABLE REPORTS OF PROBLEMS AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE HAVING WHILE LIVING IN MEXICO PLEASE POST THEM.....
(1) When is the treatment of American citizens in Mexico and their rights vs US treatment of Mexicans going to be an issue when we discuss amnesty ?
Here are three questions:that has yet to appear on any US legislator’s questionaire from either chamber
ASK YOUR FEDERAL LEGISLATORS WHY IT HASN’T
Issue One
!...Should Mexican citizens when in the US be given the same rights American citizens are given while in Mexico? .......
2.. The Mexican government through public statements and educational system lays claims to major portions or all of some of our southwestern states as part of the Mexican state . Are we asking for trouble by granting their illegals an expressed path to our citizenship laying the groundwork for “squatters rights” at some future date ?
3... If it is deemed necessary to supplement the US labor force by allowing itinerant labor should the individual states make the determiniation as to the number should the offer being needed ? And should that offer not be restricted simply to Mexican nationals but to other central and south American countries as well ?
Issue 2
What makes it necessary for US to subjugate our sovereignty because of available cheap labor ? While the Godless Demo-Coms socialists encourage population control and abortion . Then complain the US is not reproducing enough citizens to replace its aging retiring workforce. But rely on (as the Romans did) on foreigners (barbarians) .to keep their welfare ponzie schemes supplied with tax money and keep the system working.....
On the Mexican problem
Ever hear of reciprocal aggrements ? These are arranged to protect the rights of American citizens working or living in other countries.
Why is it when it comes to citizens of other countries we are required to offer them the same privledges as we do to US citizens? But when it comes to US citizens who get in trouble or attempt to do business in other countries they do not get the same treatment their citizens get.
Americans can’t own coast land in Mexico. And get no title to it elsewhere. If they run out of cash they’ll get unceremoniously sent back or put in jail untill some relative comes up with the “fresh”. That’s just for starters as for granting them voting privledges yea let’s give Mexican citizens that right when American citizens vote in their elections .
Putting the amnesty issue aside for a moment, in a committee like this you inevitably and automatically get sucked into the morass of bipartisanship (translated: compromising with the enemy and abandoning your principles).
His second big dumb mistake was becoming a spokesperson for the GOP side of the committee, along with Schmuckie Schumer who speaks for the enemy. Every time a mike is stuck in Marco's face, his glib but forked tongue is obvious and his weasel words go on the record forever.
Rubio is now so stuck in the committee tar-baby that he can't get out.
His presidential future is compromised. It's also been proved he can't carry our water effectively in committee debate because the Path to Amnesty is proceeding unhindered....a path that is still with us like the yellow brick road to Oz remains forever with us in movie memory.
His best move now would be to pull out of the committee and denounce the product it will produce. But I don't see this happening.
Hasta la vista, Marco, or more probably, adios.
Leni
Thanks for posting, JohnPDuncan, and thanks for the heads up, Spacebar.
Savage Ping!
bttt