Posted on 04/17/2013 2:54:43 PM PDT by dragnet2
Last reports indicated video of a suspect planting a device was obtained, but there is no ID on the suspect.
If they have no ID on the suspect, would not showing the video to the public possibly reveal who the suspect is? Would friends, family, acquaintances, co-workers or possibly his neighbors be able to ID the suspect?
It's already been announced world wide the video was obtained at one of the bomb sites in front of a retail shop. So it would not seem likely the investigation would be compromised, since the suspect himself would already know they had video of the devise being planted at the bomb site.
If the video was aired, wouldn't it be possible someone out there would be able to identify the suspect?
How could the investigation be compromised at this point, if airing the video could possibly help or assist in identifying the suspect/suspects before they could possible plant more devices?
Unbelievable. Steve Emerson just told Hannity that obama had an unscheduled mtg tonight with a Saudi official and that the Saudi student in the hospital is being deported instead of being arrested. If true, the FBI leakers are losing the battle.
Hannity and his guests are saying it’s the guy in the white cap (dark clothes, carrying backpack) and his friend dressed in blue (carrying blue duffel bag.
deported because his visa expired? or did they say why?
Deported Saudis tell no tales...
thank you for my oversight...the correction is right on!!!
FBI didn’t get Osama, and it took what, 10 years to get him? These guys were in the US as of Monday. The way the TSA works, the guys could have flown out of here by now.
The Alabama or Mobile Cross Country Coach said someone was making announcements there was a drill. Either he or someone else said there were bomb-sniffing dogs which they had never seen before at such an event.
What makes you say that? My comments and question regarding the video at the top of the thread and elsewhere, are very clear.
BTW, I don't buy any of your wild speculation.
I'm a bit confused by your comment. Could you elaborate?
My wild speculation? As compared to the “sober” notion that all the law enforcement personnel, media outlets and others are conspiring to keep the muslim and dark skinned suspects under wraps until a white suspect can be framed for this crime? Who’s making wild speculation here?
BTW, I don't buy any of your wild speculation.
My wild speculation? As compared to the “sober” notion that all the law enforcement personnel, media outlets and others are conspiring to keep the muslim and dark skinned suspects under wraps until a white suspect can be framed for this crime? Who’s making wild speculation here?
I never never suggested or implied any of that.
My comments were regarding reports of an unidentified suspect on video planting a bomb, and why they would not release the video in the hopes of identifying the suspect.
You are the one who injected wild speculation. Can you not see what you wrote above?
BTW,I never mentioned the word, "Muslim" on this thread.
You speculated the following with theses comments:
1. They’re toying with the suspect/suspects
2. They're intentionally disseminating false information
3. They're putting out bad info to confuse the "cell" hoping to force the "cell" into making a mistake.
4. They do not want to release the video of the suspect planting the device so they can arrest others who are involved.
Once again, this is all your wild speculation above, not mine.
My speculation is that the police are doing their job; hardly a wild speculation.
That's is not what you stated earlier. You speculated wildly stating:
1. They’re toying with the suspect/suspects
2. They're intentionally disseminating false information
3. They're putting out bad info to confuse the "cell" hoping to force the "cell" into making a mistake.
4. They do not want to release the video of the suspect planting the device so they can arrest others who are involved.
Those steps are clearly and obviously a legitimate part of any police forces job. That is not subject to question by any reasonable person. Wake up.
Can you explain how you know all this below is happening?
___________________________________________________________
1. They’re toying with the suspect/suspects
2. They’re intentionally disseminating false information
3. They’re putting out bad info to confuse the “cell” hoping to force the “cell” into making a mistake.
4. They do not want to release the video of the suspect planting the device so they can arrest others who are involved.
If you need this explained in small words, I’ll try.
Bad things happened. Bad people did them. Grownups tried to make sense of those things. Some grownups had some ideas to help make sense of what the bad people did. I offered my ideas. My ideas made more sense to me than the other ideas. They still do. I didn’t force anyone to accept my ideas. Growups are free to decide for themselves what makes sense to them. Every word I just wrote is true.
Based on your own comments seen in #152, I'd say you're one the few on this thread making wild reckless speculative comments..
Unless that is, you can show your comments to real, credible and is what is actually happening in this case.
If so, lets see it Mr. muir!
Wild speculation is not the, "Truth" and what you said on this thread is pure speculation.
In fact, I am starting to think you're possibly mentally ill or impaired.
Take care.
Every word I said in my most recent response is true. Sorry I overestimated you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.