I wonder how many men Barney Frank will marry?
Polygamy is already legal for those who can play the legalistic game and afford to pay off the extra wives and illegitimate kids.
Remember, they said it would “never come to this”.
Call it a fallacy all you like, but the slippery slope argument sure seems to hold up.
Would that be a limit of 4 wives for the Muslims.
I had a gay polygamist university professor tell me that polygamy was the next step 10 years ago. And they will have a lot of support from certain quarters on this.
Actually, didn’t Utah have to make it illegal before they were allowed to join the Union. So my point is if they had gay marriage back in the 1800s in a particular territory, the USA probably would have forced them to make it illegal. So now that the USA is allowing gay marriage, why can’t Utah bring back polygamy? I understood that premise for forcing them to ban polygamy was so they would have a similar marriage laws as the rest of the states at the time. Now that premise has been thrown out the window and the country has adopted perverted views about marriage. I really don’t carefor polygamy, but I find it more normal than gay marriage, not it is much better.
It was only a matter of time.
“And so it begins!” Ambassador Kosh
The definition of marriage is plastic. Just like heterosexual marriage is no better or worse than homosexual marriage, marriage between two consenting adults is not inherently more or less “correct” than marriage among three (or four, or six) consenting adults.
Of course it's "plastic" to a liberal who believes in moral subjectivity. If you redefine it or change its meaning once, what is stopping you from doing it again? Nothing. If marriage can mean anything, it ends up meaning nothing.
Though polygamists are a minority—a tiny minority, in fact—freedom has no value unless it extends to even the smallest and most marginalized groups among us. So let’s fight for marriage equality until it extends to every same-sex couple in the United States—and then let’s keep fighting. We’re not done yet.
Of course you aren't done yet. You aren't done until you destroy all the meaning of family and the traditional Judeo-Christian values that built this country.
Isn’t it disturbing that 11,000 braindead morons “liked” this? Ironically, as of my post, 666 people have tweeted it.
Thank God they said this now. Now all we need to do is publicize it like crazy. We can make this into a noose for gay marriage advocates.
Group marriage is next after polygamy. Why only multiple wives? Communal living.
Polygamy is self punishing.
They will not rest until you can have sex with your own minor kids.
Hey, I want to marry my wild boar.
Yes, she’s a little overweight, but she’s a hard charger in the sack.
Who has any right to tell me, “No”?
To her credit, Miss Keenan is being more intellectually honest than many of her fellow leftists about this issue. Of course when one of the fundamental essentials of marriage(one man to one woman) is eliminated, then another fundamental essential(number of persons involved) is the next logical step. The ultimate goal in all this madness is to destroy the special status of the natural family and replace it with the state.
You may be needed in this thread soon...
I have much less against polygamy than I do against Gay marriage.
And no... I’m not a Mormon, nor am I a Muslim.