Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al Roker Appalled by Poll Showing 37 Percent Believe Global Warming is a Hoax
Newsbusters ^ | 4/03/13 | Geoffrey Dickens

Posted on 04/04/2013 3:23:58 PM PDT by Libloather

NBC's Al Roker was appalled by a poll of conspiracy theories that showed 37 percent of those surveyed believed global warming was a hoax. During a discussion, on Wednesday's Today show, of a Public Policy Polling survey that included respondents' views on everything from the John F. Kennedy assassination to the existence of Bigfoot, co-host Willie Geist reported: "Global warming is a hoax. Thirty-seven percent believe that."

To which Roker responded with an audible, "Wow!" and then later scolded global warming skeptics: "Okay, two words: Superstorm Sandy!" (video after the jump)

The following is the relevant exchange as it was aired on the April 3 Today show:

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2013polls; climatechange; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; hoax; poll; roker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: Libloather

Al Roker the black replacement for Willard Scott , he should have replaced Willard as Bozo the clown, he is more suited for it.

They looked for a black replacement and found a jovial fat black man and hired Al. Al is not known for being the sharpest knife in the drawer.


61 posted on 04/04/2013 4:25:45 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Roker is an idiot. TWC drives the AGW agenda.

Had it on this morning, and was reminded of the evil carbon destroying Earth. Pathetic.


62 posted on 04/04/2013 4:26:15 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

By the way someone asked Willard Scott where he got his weather information and Willard said from the phone company weather report.

I doubt Al has a better source.


63 posted on 04/04/2013 4:28:19 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

To which Roker responded with an audible, “Wow!” and then later scolded global warming skeptics: “Okay, two words: Superstorm Sandy!” (video after the jump)

Al is an idiot, as these examples show:

between 1278 and 1438 — A major hurricane struck the modern-day New York/New Jersey area, probably the strongest in recent millennium.[1]

October 29, 1693 — The Great Storm of 1693 causes severe damage on Long Island, and is reported to create the Fire Island Cut as a result of the coast-changing storm surge and waves.[2][3]

September 23, 1785 — Several large ships crash into Governors Island as a result of powerful waves which are reported to have been generated by a tropical cyclone.[3]

August 19, 1788 — A hurricane strikes New York City or Long Island and is reported to have left the west side of the Battery “laid in ruins” after severe flooding occurs.[3]

October 9, 1804 — Heavy snow falls in Eastern New York peaking at 30 inches (75 cm) as a hurricane tracks northward along the East Coast and becomes extratropical, as cold air fed into the system

September 3, 1821 — The 1821 Norfolk and Long Island hurricane results in severe damage on Long Island and is accompanied by storm surge of 13 feet (4 m). High wind causes a ship to crash on Long Island killing 17 people.[7]

October 13, 1846 — The Great Havana Hurricane of 1846 tracks inland, causing some damage to New York City.[3]

October 6, 1849 — Severe structural damage occurs in New York City and Long Island with the passage of a hurricane to the east.[3]

September 21, 1938 — The New England Hurricane of 1938 (Also Called “The Long Island Express”) makes landfall on Suffolk County (Long Island) as a category 3 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale.[23] Wind gusts of 125 mph (200 km/h) and storm surge of 18 feet (5 m) washes across part of the island.[24] In New York 60 deaths and hundreds of injuries were attributed to the storm.[25] In addition, 2,600 boats and 8,900 houses are destroyed.[26] Throughout New England the hurricane killed over 682 people,[27] damaged or destroyed over 57,000 homes, and caused property losses estimated at $4.7 billion (2005 US dollars).[28]

September 14, 1944 — The 1944 Great Atlantic Hurricane makes landfall on Long Island as a category 1 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale at a high forward speed of 40 mph (64 km/h). Wind gusts of well over 100 mph (160 km/h) breaks previous wind records in New York City, while a minimum pressure reading of 28.47 inches is recorded on Long Island. 117 homes are completely destroyed, while 2,427 are severely damaged and almost 1000 businesses are destroyed or damaged. In all, six people are killed, and one person is injured.[29]

1954 — Hurricane Hazel - wind gust of 113 mph at Battery Park, highest ever recorded in New York City.

August 31, 1954 — Hurricane Carol makes landfall on Long Island and produces wind gusts of 120 miles per hour (190 km/h) on Montauk Point.[3] On eastern Long Island near where Carol made landfall, a pressure of 960 mbar is recorded.[30] Winds on the island gust to 120 mph (195 km/h). The hurricane’s storm surge covers the Montauk Highway in Montauk, effectively isolating eastern Long Island for a period of time. Due to the compact nature of the storm, most of Long Island is largely unaffected by the hurricane.[30] Specific damage totals for New York are unknown, although the storm in its entirety causes $460 million (1954 USD) in damage.[30]

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_York_hurricanes


64 posted on 04/04/2013 4:30:13 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Did the news make Al poop his pants?

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide - Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts? By Timothy Ball

No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)

The missing hotspot (JoNova)

Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.

Sky-high hole blown in AGW theory?

"Forbes reports on a peer-reviewed study that uses NASA data to show that the effects of carbon-based warming have been significantly exaggerated. In fact, much of the heat goes out into space rather than stay trapped in the atmosphere, an outcome that started long before AGW alarmists predicted:"

That article explains why no Hot Spot has been found.

The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'

It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming

Simple Chemistry and the Real Greenhouse Effect.

Those five articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.

Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud

That article kills any thought of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign of rising sea levels how could the planet be warming? The rise in sea level in the last 100 years is almost exactly the same as the average over the last 40,000 years caused by the inter-glacial period we are in.

65 posted on 04/04/2013 4:36:11 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
RE: "Dumb A**hole."
Your being entirely to kind. :)
66 posted on 04/04/2013 4:37:34 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Galt level is not far away......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE

I hope you wiped it off first!


67 posted on 04/04/2013 4:40:06 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
OK, which meterologist should I believe?

Al Roker?

Or Joe Bastardi?


68 posted on 04/04/2013 4:44:12 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

[for those who don’t know, Joe Bastardi has repeatedly debunked the Global Warming crowd]


69 posted on 04/04/2013 4:45:26 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Well, I am appalled that the no-talent, obnoxious, and unattractive Roker is a TV personality.


70 posted on 04/04/2013 4:56:25 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

saying the name of a storm is not scientific evidence of global warming.

the fact researchrs have been warping data to prop up junk science theories, now that’s real evidence right there.


71 posted on 04/04/2013 4:57:18 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE

Roker was so honored to be at Zero’s White Hut, he couldn’t contain his excrement.


72 posted on 04/04/2013 4:59:15 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
TWC drives the AGW agenda.

Another brilliant move by the libs having NBCU buy WC and spew out propaganda under the guise of reporting.

I saw the other day they are going to start showing "carbon" maps along with weather maps.

73 posted on 04/04/2013 5:02:09 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Ernest.


74 posted on 04/04/2013 5:05:44 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Because if I want to hear a learned opinion about the climate, my first stop would be Al Roker.

(Al, one word for you: “Busted!” Soon, it will be a minority who believe in AGW.)


75 posted on 04/04/2013 5:06:29 PM PDT by Rocky (Obama is pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

He is so appalled that he pooped in his pants...


76 posted on 04/04/2013 5:11:49 PM PDT by tips up (Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Two words for Roker:

Pooper Scooper


77 posted on 04/04/2013 5:14:00 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Arguing with a marxist is like playing Chess with a Pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Say...I looked up “superstorm” on dictionary.com, and I did not get any results.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/superstorm?s=t

It seems like someone might have written them altogether in an effort to make Al Poopypants look less foolish.


78 posted on 04/04/2013 5:18:17 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

And just remember, Al is the smartest one on the show...


79 posted on 04/04/2013 5:22:11 PM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Nice global warming early spring we’re having ay?


80 posted on 04/04/2013 5:23:01 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson