Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/24/2013 5:25:53 PM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: george76

It’s about jobs....Plenty of fish in the sea!!


2 posted on 03/24/2013 5:27:13 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Damn government....He China poison or nothing??


3 posted on 03/24/2013 5:28:18 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
UN Agenda 21's first target is America.

Once America falls, the rest will be easy.

4 posted on 03/24/2013 5:30:39 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Here in Md. they paid farmers not to raise tobacco for ten years.
The ten years is about up.

Many barns have fallen down equipment has rusted and fallen apart, farmers have found other jobs.
Most could not go back to raising tobacco even if they wanted to for these rason and the fact that a labor intensive industry has lost it’s labor force.

Much of the same will happen in new England, Boats will all apart, nets will go bad and fishermen will find different jobs or go on the poublic dole.

This is the great plan. Yes it’s stupid, but it will happen, the fishing industry in new England will die, and foreigners will soon be fishing our waters.


5 posted on 03/24/2013 5:41:02 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Why should we produce anything? We can always just print greenbacks and import all the stuff we need!


6 posted on 03/24/2013 5:41:47 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

We refuse to purchase any seafood which is not a product of the USA. The US river catfish is almost inedible—local pond-caught fish has been good.


7 posted on 03/24/2013 5:42:16 PM PDT by Silentgypsy (I must be all here, because everyone keeps telling me I'm not all there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

I’m seeing more and more fish and shellfish coming from China.

I see that stamped on the package and put it right back.

Not taking any chances....


9 posted on 03/24/2013 5:51:42 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
The article doesn't give the reason for the catch-limit (typical lame-stream "media" reporting), so I assume it's our government in their infinitely-limited wisdom. Won't others (foreigners) move into those fishing areas and catch all they want, especially if their own country's laws do not limit their catch, thus negating any "good" our idiotic "representatives" are attempting?
10 posted on 03/24/2013 5:54:57 PM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

No, they will just import polluted fish from china, enjoy the Gordon’s Fisherman’s fish while it lasts, next fish you eat will be Glorious People’s Polluted Polluck...


12 posted on 03/24/2013 6:08:44 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Does Chinese know the ole Deadliest catch saying there is right way, wrong way, and Norgerian way

Just sayin


15 posted on 03/24/2013 6:18:32 PM PDT by SevenofNine (We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

read the whole article.. at no point did it mention WHY they were being limited

I did read how a majority of the fish eaten in the US comes from foreign sources... even when domestic sources for the same fish exist.

instead of limiting domestic catch, they should be increasing tariffs on imports, helping to shift the market to domestic suppliers

people should point out that the ppl in govt aren’t trying to help them... but make them more dependent on govt assistance


20 posted on 03/24/2013 6:37:25 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

bump


25 posted on 03/24/2013 7:16:27 PM PDT by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The science used to measure fish population is not accurate enough to determine the true picture. You could be doing fish sampling in one area and find the fish down in levels while they would be at normal levels somewhere else. Yet because of that sample, you think there was a reduction in fish levels. Funding to develop better tracking is being limited by the cash-strapped federal government. Even then fish levels naturally undergo a boom and bust cycle and much can be blamed on natural cycles in the aqua-environment rather than over fishing. Even with lower fish harvests through quotas, the levels have been found to go even lower. What is happening? The answer may be the true cause of the current drop in levels is not understood and it may be a matter of Chicken Little causing an over-reaction. Until the science is there to understand what is really happening, policy makers are really shooting in the dark.

What should we do? I proposed in another post about this situation, that one solution would be to create hatcheries to produce cod hatchlings that would boost the natural levels and level out the boom-bust phenomenon. Such hatcheries would be as close to the natural spawning places as technically possible to preserve the genetic diversity found in the wild species. Such would be located in places that would have all the natural conditions to insure the maximum production of hatchlings. Once the hatchlings have reached a size to be on their own, they can be released to the wild using controlled release techniques that would not stress out any one area where they are released.

The question would be how to pay for them. State taxes? Fishing cooperatives? License fees? Federal emergency funds?


26 posted on 03/24/2013 7:35:51 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Cod stocks have been dropping for a while now, so I’m not entirely surprised at the limits.

Still, one would think there’s a better way to manage the situation than draconian cuts that are going to destroy the livelihood and a way of life for a lot of NE fishermen. Anecdotally, I could point to market supply and demand.

A lot of the churches in my area have switched from cod to haddock for their fish fries because of the jump in cod prices stemming from the low stocks. As people substitute away from one good to another, demand will lessen, easing the pressure on the cod stocks. As supply naturally increases and prices once again fall, the balance is restored. It just seems to me that we have enough smart people in this country that we can figure out how to solve the problem without destroying an industry.

Assuming, of course, that isn’t the actual goal of the legislation...


30 posted on 03/24/2013 8:28:12 PM PDT by DemforBush (Bring me the head of Alfredo Garcia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

I noticed this happening a few years ago and for whatever reason... Our side doesn’t touch it.

This a perfect opportunity to champion the little guy (probably Dems) and while doing the right thing.... Pick up sympathetic Dem votes for our side.


32 posted on 03/24/2013 8:34:05 PM PDT by WomBom ("I read Free Republic for the pictures")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson