Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well, obviously it won't be an exact replica of the Titanic no matter what they're going to claim. First of all, it won't be made from the same sub-par inferior steel that was used on the original Titanic, the primary reason the ship went down after scraping the iceberg making a huge gash in the hull that doomed the ship. Secondly, almost as significant,there will be more than enough lifeboats for everyone, of that I'm sure.

Another thing that I'm sure of is the multitude of morons who are going to stand at the very edge of the ship's bow shouting at the top of their lungs, "I'm King of the World"!!

Some people might consider traveling on the Titanic II, a unique opportunity, almost historical in circumstance. As far as I'm concerned, this whole thing is a publicity stunt. It may initially sell out on the first few voyages but after awhile the company will surely go bankrupt in this day and age despite the success of the modern ocean vacation cruisers. Besides, who would want to travel the Titanic II after the very first voyage (even if it survives the trip to New York)? The original Titanic never had that sort of luxury.

To me, I wouldn't take a trip on it even if I received free passage in the most luxurious suite, the entire project, idea of a Titanic replica gives me the chills as being quite macabre.

1 posted on 03/04/2013 4:00:35 AM PST by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: lbryce

If it will take me across the Pacific without squishing me into life-threatening shapes which take two weeks to decompress, I am willing to consider it. I’ve looked into traveling via cargo ships but haven’t quite figured the thing out.

I hate air travel.


2 posted on 03/04/2013 4:06:22 AM PST by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

I dont think I could ever book a passage on that ship. I’m not worried about sinking. Its just too creepy.


3 posted on 03/04/2013 4:08:35 AM PST by lowbridge (Joe Biden: "Look, the Taliban per se is not our enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
I imagine they will have a hard time selling the maiden voyage. If they survive that bookings should pick up.

CC

4 posted on 03/04/2013 4:14:34 AM PST by Celtic Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

What could possibly go wrong?


6 posted on 03/04/2013 4:15:52 AM PST by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

If it’s coal burning the green weenies will pitch a fit.


7 posted on 03/04/2013 4:18:04 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

In other news. A group in Greenland is calving off an exact replica of an Iceberg originally calves from a local glacier back in 1912.

Irresistible force? Meet immovable object.


9 posted on 03/04/2013 4:19:38 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

That’s going to take one mother of a 3D printer to complete!


10 posted on 03/04/2013 4:23:16 AM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
No appeal to me at all. Guess I'll wait for the Hindenburg II.
12 posted on 03/04/2013 4:29:12 AM PST by CrazyIvan (Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

The maiden cruise of Titanic II will host the inaugural ball of Odinga’s third term.

What, no one’s laughing?


14 posted on 03/04/2013 4:38:45 AM PST by Old Sarge (We are officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

I sure hope its not an exact replica of the Titanic.If it is it will have the same structural weaknesses that caused the original to sink.

Somehow I don’t think that’s the case.


15 posted on 03/04/2013 4:38:48 AM PST by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Is the ship’s crest a hand with its middle-finger extended towards Heaven?


17 posted on 03/04/2013 4:57:52 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
I would love to -see- a beautiful four-stack steamer with racehorse lines. I would certainly pay a reasonable fee to tour one in port.

But for a two week voyage? Give me one of those ugly new floating hotels with hundreds of reasonably priced big, comfortable outside cabins, every single time.

18 posted on 03/04/2013 5:04:28 AM PST by Notary Sojac (Ut veniant omnes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

I would rather not tempt irony that much. The first Titanic was “unsinkable” which was tempting enough. Now we have the second which will be ‘really unsinkable”. Thanks but no thanks.


19 posted on 03/04/2013 5:05:13 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

I wouldn’t sail on it. I’m not superstitious but... That’s just tempting fate, or flipping it off, a little too much. The sea doesn’t have much of a sense of humor, particularly for mankind thinking we have power over it. Remember, most of our ships and aircraft to this day still run and hide from storms.


20 posted on 03/04/2013 5:13:50 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Will there be a Titanic (1) museum onboard?


21 posted on 03/04/2013 5:15:45 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Hopefully there will be some on board off-center ballast tanks to give an authentic list during mid-cruise.


24 posted on 03/04/2013 5:27:49 AM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

As far as sub par steel the first one had high suplphur steel, Chinese steel isabout as good, so it will have basically the same quality steel, marginally better.


28 posted on 03/04/2013 5:46:03 AM PST by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

being quite macabre.

Wonder if they’ll hire ladies and gentlemen to stroll the first class area dressed in 1900’s splendor. THAT would be creepy.


29 posted on 03/04/2013 6:14:14 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Heck, I’d pay good money to eat gruel and sleep in a in steerage bunkhouse... ok... /sarc


32 posted on 03/04/2013 6:32:21 AM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

It will doubtlessly have modern staterooms, but the problem is that modern windows and balconies that cruisers expect would make the ship look all wrong.


33 posted on 03/04/2013 6:53:51 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Oppression -> Extermination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson