Claiming this would protect guns is outrageous hypocrisy. In other words, nothing new from the liberal socialists/communists and their media lapdogs.
1 posted on
02/16/2013 4:49:32 PM PST by
DJ MacWoW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
![Hosted by imgur.com](http://i.imgur.com/7ORKoqOl.jpg)
Click The Pic To Donate
Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can
2 posted on
02/16/2013 4:51:48 PM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(My faith and politics cannot be separated)
To: DJ MacWoW
Camel’s nose, “gun control” (People control).
3 posted on
02/16/2013 4:53:03 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Now Playing. Obama II - The Revenge of My Father.)
To: DJ MacWoW
LOL! Not banned, until a couple of years. Like the SS told the more educated city Jews “don’t worry, we are only after the farmer jews out in the country”. Tell these losers to go “F” themselves.
5 posted on
02/16/2013 4:55:29 PM PST by
Lockbar
(Quality Factory Loaded Ammunition ------- The New Gold)
To: DJ MacWoW
About 15 minutes after any ban is passed into law some damned liberal will show up screaming that it doesn’t ban enough.
6 posted on
02/16/2013 4:55:50 PM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: DJ MacWoW
BOOYA! MINI 14, ME LIKE BIGTIME.
Just wish I had one. (sigh)
7 posted on
02/16/2013 4:55:50 PM PST by
ConradofMontferrat
(According to mudslimz, my handle is a HATE CRIME. And I HOPE they don't like it.)
To: DJ MacWoW
Weasel words. Squealer from “Animal Farm” has devoted fans.
13 posted on
02/16/2013 5:11:48 PM PST by
Old Sarge
(We are officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet...)
To: DJ MacWoW
These people are insane.
Ban Assault Legislation!!
14 posted on
02/16/2013 5:13:51 PM PST by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: DJ MacWoW
Because Leftists NEVER implement anything incrementally.
It's not like if you give them an inch they'll take a mile.
17 posted on
02/16/2013 5:15:19 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
To: DJ MacWoW
So here’s the slimy Nazis at AP alerting the munchkin simpletons that certain firearms might slip through their ban.
It’s way past time to take these AP Nazis into a dark parking lot with no witnesses around and read to them the US Constitution.
18 posted on
02/16/2013 5:16:39 PM PST by
sergeantdave
(The FBI has declared war on the Marine Corps)
To: DJ MacWoW
Gun ban would
protect more than 2,200 firearms be declaration of open war.
Fixed it.
21 posted on
02/16/2013 5:18:09 PM PST by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: DJ MacWoW
23 posted on
02/16/2013 5:20:07 PM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: DJ MacWoW
All it means is that there is a “loophole” of 2200 guns that they will eventually notice and try to ban those too.
To: DJ MacWoW
One can always count on the AP for weasel-wording, especially in the headlines.
A ban bans stuff - it doesn’t protect anything. The constitution does the protecting; any legislation that includes a ban weakens that protection.
An honest headline would say “Proposed new legislation weakens constitutional protections on guns, leaving some 2200 specific guns more susceptible to further bans in the future”.
28 posted on
02/16/2013 5:21:58 PM PST by
Stosh
To: DJ MacWoW
I have a question for gunsmiths. Would it be technically feasible to design a firearm that could accept two magazines at the same time and feed from both so that a seven round limit could be mooted and the firearm would effectively hold one in the chamber and fourteen in the two mags?
35 posted on
02/16/2013 5:32:17 PM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: DJ MacWoW
****Congress’ latest crack at a new assault weapons ban would protect more than 2,200 specific firearms,****
And if they get a ban on these firearms, before the ink is dry on the bill signing it into law, they will be back with a new list of demands.
It has always been about handguns. Assault rifles are just a decoy to try and get their anti-gun foot in the door.
Once they get a ban on AWs then they will use the same reasons to go after handguns.
John Kennedy killed with a 5 shot bolt action rifle.
Charles Whitman, killed 14, wounded 32 others mostly with a bolt action 6mm hunting rifle. Also used a shotgun and an m1 carbine.
Medgar Evers, shot with a 5 shot 1917 bolt action Enfield rifle.
Martin Luther King, shot with a 4 shot Remington 760 pump action Gamemaster rifle.
Bobby Kennedy with a .22 Iver Johnson Cadet revolver.
George Wallace wounded with a 5 shot Charter Arms .38spl revolver.
Howard Johnsons shooter killed nine, wounded thirteen with a 4 shot RUGER .44 mag Deerslayer rifle.
Gerald Ford attacked with a 7 shot 1911 semi auto.
Edmond OK post office with two National Guard 7 shot 1911 pistols.
Ronald Reagan and Jim Brady with an RG-14 .22 revolver.
What do they all have in common? NONE over 7 rounds, yet after each one came a cry of panic to ban all of them.
38 posted on
02/16/2013 5:38:29 PM PST by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
( Too old to cut the mustard any more.)
To: DJ MacWoW
Gun ban would protect more than 2,200 firearmsSerial murderer spared over 7 billion people!
To: DJ MacWoW
47 posted on
02/16/2013 5:54:42 PM PST by
Iron Munro
(I miss America, don't you?)
To: DJ MacWoW
"One model of that firearm, the Ruger .223 caliber Mini-14, is on the proposed list to be banned, while a different model of the same gun is on a list of exempted firearms in legislation the Senate is considering."
Next thing you know, they'll be outlawing accurate firearms with barrel twist rates useful for self-defense and barrels that are easy to swap for everyone except government employees and other elite folks. Oh...looks like they're working on that.
53 posted on
02/16/2013 6:08:29 PM PST by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: DJ MacWoW
Agreed. Trying to sugar coat poison to make it more palatable for the masses to swallow.
57 posted on
02/16/2013 6:23:26 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: DJ MacWoW
If I stole 10% of the AP’s assets, I would claim to have protected the remaining 90%!
I wonder if the courts would buy that.
58 posted on
02/16/2013 6:23:42 PM PST by
Right Wing Assault
(Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson