Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/02/2013 9:52:46 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lowbridge

UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS = REGISTRATION = CONFISCATION = WAR

What part of this do they oot understand?


2 posted on 02/02/2013 9:58:43 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

In California, all sales (save some curio long guns) require background checks and a 10 day waiting period. All handguns registered in this process. In Jan 2014, long guns will need to be registered. All so-called assault weapons already require registration and no new non-compliant models can be purchased.

CA has already had some limited confiscation after registration....... cetain non-compliant assault weapons.

If we get universal background checks, you can bet after the next mass shooting, they will demand registration.


3 posted on 02/02/2013 10:05:09 AM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
90 percent of those polled favored expanding background checks to people who buy weapons at gun shows.

Perhaps, but what difference does it make?

8 posted on 02/02/2013 10:32:37 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Democrats and RINOS
GOD DENIERS AND CONGENITAL LIARS
ARE REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH INCITERS/
FOR FIRST YOUR MONEY THEN YOUR GUNS
AND BE DEFENSELESS WHEN CROOKS COME

It’s time to get government out of Your face
Your religion and your pocketbook

(The above is designed to be printed up and passed around your precinct and your friends and neighbors as a (index sized) palmcard.


10 posted on 02/02/2013 10:37:59 AM PST by mosesdapoet ("It's a sin to tell a lie", in telling others that , got me my nickname ......Ex Chi" mechanic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

A background check is an infringement, as much as a license or permit requirement. What part of “shall not be infringed” confuses them?


20 posted on 02/02/2013 11:04:30 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Show me even a single gun which has been used in a mass shooting purchased at a gun show.

They can go F themselves.


25 posted on 02/02/2013 11:13:03 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

The only way to enforce universal background checks is through gun registration. I’m sure thats what Barry and company are aiming for. I cannot imagine it getting through Congress. If it did everyone would just ignore it anyway.


26 posted on 02/02/2013 11:16:10 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

20,000 gun laws on the books already.

NO MORE LAWS OR REGULATIONS!

NONE!

Don’t give a G-D inch on anything!


35 posted on 02/02/2013 12:08:16 PM PST by 2111USMC (aim small, miss small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Most people don’t even know what a gun show is, and have no idea what is meant by the phrase “gun show loophole”.

They think that dealers can sell at a gunshow without doing background checks, which is false.

Ask people if they think they should have to pay for a background check to sell a gun to a friend or relative, or to inherit one from their parent. THAT is the same thing as the “gun show loophole”.


36 posted on 02/02/2013 12:09:59 PM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

One can only hope so.


38 posted on 02/02/2013 12:21:48 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

39 posted on 02/02/2013 12:23:43 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge; All
For those that think the PTB will quietly observe privacy and not have access to lists and not share those lists. Behold the city of Los Angeles now has access to firearms purchasers lists and the DA sends out letters to recent purchasers in the form of a warning letter that smacks of blatant intimidation, ie: “We know who you are and what you did”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/la-gun-owners_n_2345364.html

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=693490

41 posted on 02/02/2013 12:30:48 PM PST by Polynikes (Hakkaa Palle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
The background check issue, along with a desire to devote more resources to mental health issues, were the two ideas that had overwhelmingly large support in the polls.

This does not bode well for both houses of Congress. Presumably, deficiency in mental health would logically have repercussions well beyond gun ownership, or merely the Second Amendment...

45 posted on 02/02/2013 2:00:12 PM PST by publius911 (Look for the Union Label -- then buy something else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson