Posted on 02/02/2013 9:30:30 AM PST by bray
Be careful, however, that the exercise of your Freedom does not become a stumbling block to the weak. 1 Cor 8:9
What if everything about evolution is a lie? This would mean everything built on the theory of evolution is a fraud too. One of the primary gaps evolutionists never want to discuss is where life began? They have two primary theories, it either randomly developed from the primordial soup of came from another universe on an asteroid. Neither of these theories is believable yet the entire theory of evolution is built on them even though the odds are around one in infinity.
There is a huge void in scientific explanation how life and evolution started so most scientists dismiss it as not important or in any need of explanation or proof. They say there was a Big Bang when nothing became something and then exploded into an explosion creating the universe according to all of their infallible models. After billions and billions of years, life magically, oops, scientifically appeared to begin the evolutionary chain. The only explanation the Darwinists have for life beginning is time rather than God. For evolutionists God is to be mocked while billions and billions of years is a serious explanation.
If you ask an evolutionist how life began they will immediately tell you that how life began is not a part of evolution. If you continue to ax the question they will either call you all types of names the worst of which is Christian or explain how only scientists understand how life began. It usually comes down to their ability to intimidate and bully people and even fellow scientists into backing down from the obvious black hole of life’s beginning. They will usually begin their virtual firing squad for anyone daring to question the beginning of life as subhuman and not part of academia’s Holy of Holies.
Their primary explanation is the primordial soup explanation. After the Big Bang and the earth formed with millions of years of volcanoes and flowing lava when the hydrogen and oxygen combined to form water and the cooling began. Randomly the earth just happened to circle the sun at exactly the right orbit and rotation to make the water the perfect temperature for life. Then a few million years ago the chemicals randomly formed amino acids turning into some type of primitive bacteria and billions of years later that bacteria is making laptops.
The problem with this theory is how complex that random event had to be. As scientists become more and more familiar with amino acids and DNA they are finding it is far more complex than they ever knew it was. The genetic codes are still ninety eight percent unexplained as they find more and more unexplainable pieces of the complexity it points less and less to a random act. They were dismissing the unexplained parts as Junk DNA pieces since they have only been able to identify less than 2% of DNA code and invented the term junk for the rest. This should be insulting to their intelligence and certainly to ours. As they get deeper and deeper into the DNA code they are finding that there is no junk in the code and more complexity making the randomness even less possible. Simply Google junk DNA and find out the lies are being exposed by those brave enough to question science. It would take trillions and trillions of years for a DNA helix to form randomly not simply billions. http://www.psrast.org/junkdna.htm
Their second explanation which is not as universally accepted but basically a fallback theory is the amino acids and life source came from space. This was developed when they realized their primordial soup explanation really didn’t hold water. So they developed the asteroid explanation that a life seed came from a distant solar system billions of light years away and fell to the earth at just the right time and apparently into the ocean after it survived the billion year trip in a vacuum and thousand degree temps during entry into our atmosphere. The obvious questions are where did it come from and is the solar system it came from more or less superior than ours. It is ok to believe there are life forms on other planets but it is not ok to believe there is a God.
Simply because a scientist says over billions of years and billions of chances can make something happen does not make it so. This is only a theory but one that really does not withstand the smell test when you think about it. Fortunately for evolution, scientists generally refuse to question any of their theories and rely on consensus to verify and vilify their earth sized holes in their theories. They have had to fight for this theory so completely and ignore so many craters it has become more of a magic show than science. They use smoke and mirrors to keep people from asking the important questions or demanding an explanation of why those odds are looking more like infinity to one than the truth.
Imagine if scientists spent as much time, energy and money trying to find out if God is real than trying to disprove God. Science has become a religion based on an atheistic belief that we began as nothing and when we die we go back to nothing. It is a religion that places all of its faith in evolution with no explanation of how life arrived but when it came, random chance and mutations has got us to the point man can think, read and write. They have replaced God with billions and billions of years so time is the miracle of our creation. What is the difference between their faith in billions of years and faith in God?
Evolution became the first agenda driven junk science of the modern world. Science is basically following a 19th century idea which if they were true scientists would have been disproved millions of times over but the politics won’t allow it. They need to have people turn from God to force their hope and trust in the gummit. They need the people to believe gummit is their god where all of their hope exists.
If people would put their faith and hope in God they would not need the gummit and most of its controls. If people were saved by Jesus Christ and believed he is where all hope exists there would be a heaven beyond this earth, something the Darwinists can’t offer. If there is a heaven and hell and Jesus saves us sinners from that torture we deserve then we wouldn’t need gummit to regulate our lives as we would simply follow the rules set in the Bible. This is the communists’ greatest fear that people would be free to live their lives as they wish without their absolute control.
Imagine if science were to investigate the marvel of God’s creation and how it so miraculously relates together rather than attempting to use his design as proof there is no God? Science could actually be a positive to most lives rather than its need to be god and repeatedly use its power to control our lives with all of their junk science decrees. You can see all the failures of science everywhere you look so why do we continue to believe evolution with all of its massive gaps? It is time to evolve from evolution.
Pray for America
So there is not point of you being on this thread to protect your precious religion.
And no it hasn’t been questioned at all. You just rehash your same lines that the creationists should be ignored and only real scientists have the right to an opinion. Same tactic you use for global warming and we all know it is a fraud yet still practiced in your precious academia. So much for your credibility.
Too bad you didn’t accept Christ like you do billions and billions of years.
Pray for America
No different than the evolution cartoon Disney made to brainwash kids into believing man basically walked out of the primordial soup. Where did life begin?
Pray for America
Ok, So if I draw lines between a Chihuahua and a Great Dane and later find Terriers and Labradors, this is evolution ?
A horse is a horse, big or small, they are still part of the Equine family.
Take your cheap name calling somewhere else. We know you are the only intelligent person on the thread since you have evolved in your thinking. You are too intelligent to believe in a superior being, right? Now get lost or answer the question.
We have all heard and seen your tired names, now where did life come from?
Which theory gained currency?
The theory being discussed in my reply to you.
Hey Z long time! This is their latest tactic using antibotic resistant bacteria as an evolution. They are so desperate to find proof no matter how manipulated to keep their fraud alive.
Pot/Kettle/Black
just using the same tactic you are using.
Don’t like it, then don’t read it, problem solved.
“This is if you accept a biological difference between these respective races. It is something I do not accept.”
You don’t have to accept for it to be true.
On average: Asians score 5 deviation points higher than Europeans on IQ tests. Europeans score 5 deviation points higher than Africans on IQ tests. You don’t have to believe it for the scores to be accurate.
I have asked you to leave the thread unless you have something to offer. Either discuss the issue or leave. Where did life begin?
Here's the deal.
The entire enterprise is setup around "scientific understanding", with the admission from scientists that they don't know everything and will incorporate new findings as they emerge.
I'm all for science, but I also understand it's limitations as do most. The process of science, empiricism, materialism, reduction and logic are all we have at our disposal.
Using the "Scientific" process, where does logic come from ?
Is logic real ?
Or is logic just a construct ? a by product of evolution ?
enough braying
enough braying
I think these days this kind of attack on evolution drives more people away from religion and God than attracts them. Sad.
Radio-Dating (as you put it)
You do know there are other ways to date things.
You do know each have there own assumptions built into their results.
You do know that, if a result doesn’t fit a particular model the “Customer” is looking for, he has the lab continue until they find one.
Huh?
So explain to us if DNA is far more complicated than anyone thought it could simply appear. If it is so complex even with all our computerized knowledge we can’t unlock more than 2% of the code, yet it simply came together in a mud puddle?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.