Posted on 02/02/2013 9:30:30 AM PST by bray
Be careful, however, that the exercise of your Freedom does not become a stumbling block to the weak. 1 Cor 8:9
What if everything about evolution is a lie? This would mean everything built on the theory of evolution is a fraud too. One of the primary gaps evolutionists never want to discuss is where life began? They have two primary theories, it either randomly developed from the primordial soup of came from another universe on an asteroid. Neither of these theories is believable yet the entire theory of evolution is built on them even though the odds are around one in infinity.
There is a huge void in scientific explanation how life and evolution started so most scientists dismiss it as not important or in any need of explanation or proof. They say there was a Big Bang when nothing became something and then exploded into an explosion creating the universe according to all of their infallible models. After billions and billions of years, life magically, oops, scientifically appeared to begin the evolutionary chain. The only explanation the Darwinists have for life beginning is time rather than God. For evolutionists God is to be mocked while billions and billions of years is a serious explanation.
If you ask an evolutionist how life began they will immediately tell you that how life began is not a part of evolution. If you continue to ax the question they will either call you all types of names the worst of which is Christian or explain how only scientists understand how life began. It usually comes down to their ability to intimidate and bully people and even fellow scientists into backing down from the obvious black hole of life’s beginning. They will usually begin their virtual firing squad for anyone daring to question the beginning of life as subhuman and not part of academia’s Holy of Holies.
Their primary explanation is the primordial soup explanation. After the Big Bang and the earth formed with millions of years of volcanoes and flowing lava when the hydrogen and oxygen combined to form water and the cooling began. Randomly the earth just happened to circle the sun at exactly the right orbit and rotation to make the water the perfect temperature for life. Then a few million years ago the chemicals randomly formed amino acids turning into some type of primitive bacteria and billions of years later that bacteria is making laptops.
The problem with this theory is how complex that random event had to be. As scientists become more and more familiar with amino acids and DNA they are finding it is far more complex than they ever knew it was. The genetic codes are still ninety eight percent unexplained as they find more and more unexplainable pieces of the complexity it points less and less to a random act. They were dismissing the unexplained parts as Junk DNA pieces since they have only been able to identify less than 2% of DNA code and invented the term junk for the rest. This should be insulting to their intelligence and certainly to ours. As they get deeper and deeper into the DNA code they are finding that there is no junk in the code and more complexity making the randomness even less possible. Simply Google junk DNA and find out the lies are being exposed by those brave enough to question science. It would take trillions and trillions of years for a DNA helix to form randomly not simply billions. http://www.psrast.org/junkdna.htm
Their second explanation which is not as universally accepted but basically a fallback theory is the amino acids and life source came from space. This was developed when they realized their primordial soup explanation really didn’t hold water. So they developed the asteroid explanation that a life seed came from a distant solar system billions of light years away and fell to the earth at just the right time and apparently into the ocean after it survived the billion year trip in a vacuum and thousand degree temps during entry into our atmosphere. The obvious questions are where did it come from and is the solar system it came from more or less superior than ours. It is ok to believe there are life forms on other planets but it is not ok to believe there is a God.
Simply because a scientist says over billions of years and billions of chances can make something happen does not make it so. This is only a theory but one that really does not withstand the smell test when you think about it. Fortunately for evolution, scientists generally refuse to question any of their theories and rely on consensus to verify and vilify their earth sized holes in their theories. They have had to fight for this theory so completely and ignore so many craters it has become more of a magic show than science. They use smoke and mirrors to keep people from asking the important questions or demanding an explanation of why those odds are looking more like infinity to one than the truth.
Imagine if scientists spent as much time, energy and money trying to find out if God is real than trying to disprove God. Science has become a religion based on an atheistic belief that we began as nothing and when we die we go back to nothing. It is a religion that places all of its faith in evolution with no explanation of how life arrived but when it came, random chance and mutations has got us to the point man can think, read and write. They have replaced God with billions and billions of years so time is the miracle of our creation. What is the difference between their faith in billions of years and faith in God?
Evolution became the first agenda driven junk science of the modern world. Science is basically following a 19th century idea which if they were true scientists would have been disproved millions of times over but the politics won’t allow it. They need to have people turn from God to force their hope and trust in the gummit. They need the people to believe gummit is their god where all of their hope exists.
If people would put their faith and hope in God they would not need the gummit and most of its controls. If people were saved by Jesus Christ and believed he is where all hope exists there would be a heaven beyond this earth, something the Darwinists can’t offer. If there is a heaven and hell and Jesus saves us sinners from that torture we deserve then we wouldn’t need gummit to regulate our lives as we would simply follow the rules set in the Bible. This is the communists’ greatest fear that people would be free to live their lives as they wish without their absolute control.
Imagine if science were to investigate the marvel of God’s creation and how it so miraculously relates together rather than attempting to use his design as proof there is no God? Science could actually be a positive to most lives rather than its need to be god and repeatedly use its power to control our lives with all of their junk science decrees. You can see all the failures of science everywhere you look so why do we continue to believe evolution with all of its massive gaps? It is time to evolve from evolution.
Pray for America
Yours, if I am following you correctly, is as I should have guessed from something musical.
Mine, well I will only say before I leave for the nite is “So Long and Thanks for all the Fish”. I will check back in for any responses in the morning.
Ok, I checked back before I went. The song has hints of dylan. My most memorable quote from him isn’t from a song. He was doing an interview once and he told the interviewer that we (mankind) are just spirit surrounded by skin. If anyone can help me out with re-parsing tacticalogic using a ‘1’ fill me in, I may not sleep all night trying to figure it out.
A quote by Dylan or Cohen ?
As for the re-parsing, It is a distinction without a difference.
The quote was from Dylan. Sorry, it’s to late I can’t differenciate any distinctions.
‘It has withstood evaluation and attack for 150 years.”
No it hasn’t, please show development to Cambrian stage life...where is the evolution? Even Darwin recognized that his theory did not hold water unless his assumption of finding evidence of evolution to the Cambrian stage held true. It has been 150 years and to date there is no evidence of evolution to that point.
“Genesis posits that it all began with a big bang.”
Really? Chapter and verse, please.
It is called the creation fool...read the bible fully but for how the world was truly created...as well as man, read Genesis. Read the whole book.
You’re calling me a fool, because I don’t remember Genesis talking about a “Big Bang”? I know God created the universe. And I know that name calling is infantile.
You are correct, please accept my apology.
Many, including me, believe that what scientists have discovered when they identified the probable creation of mass and energy which they describe as the Big Bang Theory is of course when God actually created the universe. Below are the verses which describe that creation:
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.
Why start with the Cambrian? Here’s a random sample of papers dealing with biological evolution in the Pre-Cambrian. After you get through these, get back to me and I’ll post some more...
http://jgs.geoscienceworld.org/content/149/4/607.short
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v264/n5587/abs/264620a0.html
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00927018?LI=true
http://www.intl-geology.geoscienceworld.org/content/31/1/27.short
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160602907141
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01808177?LI=true
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018204005905
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2517/prpsj.7.43
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=6298588
Answer his question? Put away the smoke and mirrors and answer the question you were axed!
Nice try Head Priest.
First of all, the word you are struggling with is “asked”, not “axed”. You’d think that a guy pretending to be a writer would know better, but I guess not. As far answering his question, I have provided him with more than he can simply explain away. No “smoke and mirrors”, just good old fashioned science.
Who axed you for a writing lesson? Here is a virtual dollar so you can go buy a virtual sense of humor.
No you never answered his question at all. Now answer it or get lost with your cheap thug magic tricks. This is not my first rodeo with you libs.
So you didn’t even bother to look at the papers I’ve posted? Color me shocked. If you’re going to go to the rodeo, you’d better learn how to get on a horse.
I always read it as "tactical logic" with the two Ls combined.
Oh, you thought I cared what you think and your same old tired websites. He axed the question not me.
I have long quit caring what you think, you are just another sellout for evolution. You can’t afford to look at the gaps in the theory since your entire life and livelihood is from selling out to a lie.
They are nothing more than justification for accepting a fraud.
.
That was the intent. I think I’m having something of a protocol mismatch on this thread with it though. It doesn’t interface well with tactical emotion.
By George that must be the way it’s read.
Um, the journal Nature isn’t exactly a “tired old website”. Do you have any concept at all about the scientific method or peer review? It is clear to me that your education has been woefully inadequate, but it’s never too late to learn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.